Outcome After 68Ga-PSMA-11 versus Choline PET-Based Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis

The purpose of this analysis was primarily to analyze biochemical-recurrence free survival (BRFS) after positron emission tomography (PET)-guided salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in a large cohort, and to further compare BRFS after PSMA vs. choline PET/ computer tomography (CT)-based sRT. This retrospecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina-Sophie Schmidt Hegemann, Paul Rogowski, Chukwuka Eze, Christian Schäfer, Christian Stief, Sebastian Lang, Simon Spohn, Rieke Steffens, Minglun Li, Christian Gratzke, Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann, Harun Ilhan, Wolfgang Peter Fendler, Peter Bartenstein, Ute Ganswindt, Alexander Buchner, Anca-Ligia Grosu, Claus Belka, Philipp Tobias Meyer, Simon Kirste, Constantinos Zamboglou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/11/3395
Description
Summary:The purpose of this analysis was primarily to analyze biochemical-recurrence free survival (BRFS) after positron emission tomography (PET)-guided salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in a large cohort, and to further compare BRFS after PSMA vs. choline PET/ computer tomography (CT)-based sRT. This retrospective analysis is based on 421 patients referred for PSMA or choline PET/CT after radical prostatectomy due to biochemically recurrent or persistent disease. BRFS (PSA: 0.2 ng/mL) was defined as the study endpoint. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of different clinical parameters on BRFS. Additionally, propensity score matching was performed to adjust patient cohorts (PSMA vs. choline PET/CT-based sRT). The median follow-up time was 30 months. BRFS at three years after sRT was 58%. In the multivariate analysis, only PSA before PET imaging and PSA before sRT were significantly associated with BRFS (<i>p </i>< 0.05). After propensity score matching, 272 patients were further analyzed; there was no significant difference in three-year BRFS between patients with PSMA PET-based vs. choline PET-based sRT (55% vs. 63%, <i>p </i>= 0.197). The present analysis confirmed the overall high BRFS rates after PET-based sRT and the strong prognostic effect of PSA level prior to sRT. PSMA PET-based sRT did not have superior BRFS rates when compared with choline PET-based sRT.
ISSN:2072-6694