Nested control loop design for differential boost inverter using generalized averaged model in photovoltaic applications

Abstract To use photovoltaic energy, voltage source inverters are playing an important role. The most of local AC loads such as AC motors need higher voltage than solar panel output voltage. Differential boost inverter produces an AC voltage that is greater than the DC input voltage in a single powe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Amirparast, Hossein Gholizade‐narm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-08-01
Series:Energy Science & Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.718
id doaj-5a52cb37dc3b43ee9ce4e905b7ab3f38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a52cb37dc3b43ee9ce4e905b7ab3f382020-11-25T03:37:11ZengWileyEnergy Science & Engineering2050-05052020-08-01882734274610.1002/ese3.718Nested control loop design for differential boost inverter using generalized averaged model in photovoltaic applicationsAli Amirparast0Hossein Gholizade‐narm1Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Robotics Shahrood University of Technology Shahrood IranFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Robotics Shahrood University of Technology Shahrood IranAbstract To use photovoltaic energy, voltage source inverters are playing an important role. The most of local AC loads such as AC motors need higher voltage than solar panel output voltage. Differential boost inverter produces an AC voltage that is greater than the DC input voltage in a single power stage. This inverter consists of two DC‐DC bilateral boost converters in which work via time‐variant duty cycles to produce sinusoidal voltage, and this feature causes complexity in control design. To deal with this complexity, new modeling so‐called generalized averaged model is used to achieve a linear time‐invariant model. In this paper, a nested control loop is designed. This control strategy consists of two control loops in which the inner loop is designed by linear quadratic regulator theory to displace poles in proper location and the second loop uses a PI‐PR controller to track desired voltage and reject disturbances. To evaluate the proposed control method, the sliding mode controller is applied and compared as well. As shown by simulations, the proposed control strategy has more reliable performance and provides higher robustness in comparison with sliding mode control technique in rigid situations such as dealing with nonlinear load, parameters values changes, and external disturbances.https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.718boost invertergeneralized averaged modellinear quadratic regulatorPI‐PRrenewable energies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Amirparast
Hossein Gholizade‐narm
spellingShingle Ali Amirparast
Hossein Gholizade‐narm
Nested control loop design for differential boost inverter using generalized averaged model in photovoltaic applications
Energy Science & Engineering
boost inverter
generalized averaged model
linear quadratic regulator
PI‐PR
renewable energies
author_facet Ali Amirparast
Hossein Gholizade‐narm
author_sort Ali Amirparast
title Nested control loop design for differential boost inverter using generalized averaged model in photovoltaic applications
title_short Nested control loop design for differential boost inverter using generalized averaged model in photovoltaic applications
title_full Nested control loop design for differential boost inverter using generalized averaged model in photovoltaic applications
title_fullStr Nested control loop design for differential boost inverter using generalized averaged model in photovoltaic applications
title_full_unstemmed Nested control loop design for differential boost inverter using generalized averaged model in photovoltaic applications
title_sort nested control loop design for differential boost inverter using generalized averaged model in photovoltaic applications
publisher Wiley
series Energy Science & Engineering
issn 2050-0505
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract To use photovoltaic energy, voltage source inverters are playing an important role. The most of local AC loads such as AC motors need higher voltage than solar panel output voltage. Differential boost inverter produces an AC voltage that is greater than the DC input voltage in a single power stage. This inverter consists of two DC‐DC bilateral boost converters in which work via time‐variant duty cycles to produce sinusoidal voltage, and this feature causes complexity in control design. To deal with this complexity, new modeling so‐called generalized averaged model is used to achieve a linear time‐invariant model. In this paper, a nested control loop is designed. This control strategy consists of two control loops in which the inner loop is designed by linear quadratic regulator theory to displace poles in proper location and the second loop uses a PI‐PR controller to track desired voltage and reject disturbances. To evaluate the proposed control method, the sliding mode controller is applied and compared as well. As shown by simulations, the proposed control strategy has more reliable performance and provides higher robustness in comparison with sliding mode control technique in rigid situations such as dealing with nonlinear load, parameters values changes, and external disturbances.
topic boost inverter
generalized averaged model
linear quadratic regulator
PI‐PR
renewable energies
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.718
work_keys_str_mv AT aliamirparast nestedcontrolloopdesignfordifferentialboostinverterusinggeneralizedaveragedmodelinphotovoltaicapplications
AT hosseingholizadenarm nestedcontrolloopdesignfordifferentialboostinverterusinggeneralizedaveragedmodelinphotovoltaicapplications
_version_ 1724546640586473472