Semiosis and ‘meaning as use’: The indispensability and insufficiency of subjectivity in the action of signs

Thematic development of semiotics proves to be a transformative event for intellectual culture, manifesting itself to begin with in its reshaping of the usage of many philosophical terms in their reflection of mainstream modern philosophy as its influence has sedimented down the level of ordinary la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Deely
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2015-06-01
Series:Sign Systems Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15873
id doaj-5a57ab6631ac4bc39f46da94ab1fe1db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a57ab6631ac4bc39f46da94ab1fe1db2021-04-02T12:38:46ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092015-06-0143110.12697/SSS.2015.43.1.01Semiosis and ‘meaning as use’: The indispensability and insufficiency of subjectivity in the action of signsJohn Deely0Saint Vincent College 300 Fraser Purchase Road Latrobe, PA 15650-2690Thematic development of semiotics proves to be a transformative event for intellectual culture, manifesting itself to begin with in its reshaping of the usage of many philosophical terms in their reflection of mainstream modern philosophy as its influence has sedimented down the level of ordinary language, i.e., today’s common speech. Central among these terms are subject and object as modern usage has established their sense, a sense which proves incompatible with the understanding of things that is emerging from the cenoscopic analysis of the being and action of signs. In particular also the term ‘relation’, surely among the most widely used and least analysed terms of philosophy today, proves upon semiotic analysis to require a whole new understanding of the subjectivity/objectivity and object/thing distinctions as they have come to be more or less “settled” in modern usage. This essay explores the implications for such usage consequent upon the postmodern development of semiotics as the “doctrine” or “cenoscopic science” of signs.https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15873alloanimalanimalconceptsfeelingsideasintersubjective
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Deely
spellingShingle John Deely
Semiosis and ‘meaning as use’: The indispensability and insufficiency of subjectivity in the action of signs
Sign Systems Studies
alloanimal
animal
concepts
feelings
ideas
intersubjective
author_facet John Deely
author_sort John Deely
title Semiosis and ‘meaning as use’: The indispensability and insufficiency of subjectivity in the action of signs
title_short Semiosis and ‘meaning as use’: The indispensability and insufficiency of subjectivity in the action of signs
title_full Semiosis and ‘meaning as use’: The indispensability and insufficiency of subjectivity in the action of signs
title_fullStr Semiosis and ‘meaning as use’: The indispensability and insufficiency of subjectivity in the action of signs
title_full_unstemmed Semiosis and ‘meaning as use’: The indispensability and insufficiency of subjectivity in the action of signs
title_sort semiosis and ‘meaning as use’: the indispensability and insufficiency of subjectivity in the action of signs
publisher University of Tartu Press
series Sign Systems Studies
issn 1406-4243
1736-7409
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Thematic development of semiotics proves to be a transformative event for intellectual culture, manifesting itself to begin with in its reshaping of the usage of many philosophical terms in their reflection of mainstream modern philosophy as its influence has sedimented down the level of ordinary language, i.e., today’s common speech. Central among these terms are subject and object as modern usage has established their sense, a sense which proves incompatible with the understanding of things that is emerging from the cenoscopic analysis of the being and action of signs. In particular also the term ‘relation’, surely among the most widely used and least analysed terms of philosophy today, proves upon semiotic analysis to require a whole new understanding of the subjectivity/objectivity and object/thing distinctions as they have come to be more or less “settled” in modern usage. This essay explores the implications for such usage consequent upon the postmodern development of semiotics as the “doctrine” or “cenoscopic science” of signs.
topic alloanimal
animal
concepts
feelings
ideas
intersubjective
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15873
work_keys_str_mv AT johndeely semiosisandmeaningasusetheindispensabilityandinsufficiencyofsubjectivityintheactionofsigns
_version_ 1721568224433143808