Training in experimental design and statistics is essential: Response to Jordan.
This Formal Comment responds to Jordan et al., and stresses that if scientific findings are to be robust, training in experimental design and statistics is critical to ensure that research questions, design considerations, and analyses are aligned.
Main Authors: | Stanley E Lazic, Charlie J Clarke-Williams, Marcus R Munafò |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-10-01
|
Series: | PLoS Biology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000022 |
Similar Items
-
What exactly is 'N' in cell culture and animal experiments?
by: Stanley E Lazic, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections
by: Lazic Stanley E
Published: (2009-01-01) -
The Influence of the Idea of Progress on the Curriculum Theories of Experimentalism, Essentialism, and Reconstructionism
by: Clarke, Christopher R.
Published: (1975) -
The Influence of the Idea of Progress on the Curriculum Theories of Experimentalism, Essentialism, and Reconstructionism
by: Clarke, Christopher R.
Published: (1975) -
No Jordan’s Principle Cases in Canada? A Review of the Administrative Response to Jordan’s Principle
by: Anne Blumenthal, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)