Argument appraisal strategy: A comprehensive approach
A popular three-stage argument appraisal strategy calls for (1) identifying the parts of the argument, (2) classifYing the argument as deductive, inductive, or some other type, and (3) appraising the argument using the standards appropriate for the type. This strategy fails for a number of reasons....
Main Author: | Robert H. Ennis |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2001-01-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2240 |
Similar Items
-
Critique of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test: The More You Know, the Lower Your Score
by: Kevin Possin
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Critique of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test: The More You Know, the Lower Your Score
by: Kevin Possin
Published: (2014-12-01) -
The 'Most Important and Fundamental' Distinction in Logic
by: G.C. Goddu
Published: (2001-01-01) -
A Unitary Schema for Arguments by Analogy
by: Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Published: (2012-03-01) -
Conductive Arguments: Why is This Still a Thing?
by: Kevin Possin
Published: (2016-12-01)