Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas

Objective: The objective was to assess continuation of the pill, patch, ring or injectable (i.e., short-acting hormonal contraception); characteristics associated with discontinuation; and subsequent method use among low-income postpartum women in Texas. Study design: Using a 24-month cohort study o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristen Lagasse Burke, Lauren Thaxton, Joseph E. Potter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Contraception: X
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300356
id doaj-5a95f0023a6c430ca8035de0b2b168d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5a95f0023a6c430ca8035de0b2b168d82021-01-10T04:11:08ZengElsevierContraception: X2590-15162021-01-013100052Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in TexasKristen Lagasse Burke0Lauren Thaxton1Joseph E. Potter2Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Corresponding author at: 305 E. 23rd St., Stop G18000, Austin, TX, 78712.Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Dell Medical School, Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USAPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Dell Medical School, Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USAObjective: The objective was to assess continuation of the pill, patch, ring or injectable (i.e., short-acting hormonal contraception); characteristics associated with discontinuation; and subsequent method use among low-income postpartum women in Texas. Study design: Using a 24-month cohort study of 1700 women who delivered in eight Texas hospitals and were uninsured or publicly insured at the time of delivery, we focused on 456 women who used short-acting hormonal contraception within 6 months after delivery. We classified this sample according to characteristics and method preference, and estimated rates of discontinuation and associated predictors using life tables and Cox models. We assessed reasons for discontinuation and subsequent contraceptive use among those who discontinued. Results: Roughly half used the pill and half used the injectable. One hundred seventy-eight (39%) expressed a baseline preference for the method they used, 162 (36%) preferred a long-acting reversible contraception method, and 41 (9%) preferred sterilization. After 1 year, 72% had discontinued [95% confidence interval (CI) 67.1–75.7]. Foreign-born Hispanic women were less likely to discontinue than U.S.-born Hispanics [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.65; 95% CI 0.50–0.84]. Those who wanted a more effective method (aHR, 1.44; 95% CI 1.12–1.85) and those who lost insurance coverage (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI 1.12–1.92) were more likely to discontinue. The most common reasons for discontinuation were side effects and access/cost. Of those who discontinued, 243 (68%) switched to a less effective or no method. Only 47 (13%) switched to their preferred method. Conclusions: Short-acting hormonal contraceptive discontinuation is high in this population. Many switch to less effective methods after discontinuation despite preferring methods at least as effective as the pill, patch, ring or injectable. Implications: Expanding contraceptive coverage in the 2 years after delivery should be a state and federal policy priority. In clinics, providers should discuss contraceptive preferences throughout pregnancy and the interpregnancy interval.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300356Postpartum contraceptionShort-acting hormonal contraceptionContraceptive continuationContraceptive discontinuation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristen Lagasse Burke
Lauren Thaxton
Joseph E. Potter
spellingShingle Kristen Lagasse Burke
Lauren Thaxton
Joseph E. Potter
Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas
Contraception: X
Postpartum contraception
Short-acting hormonal contraception
Contraceptive continuation
Contraceptive discontinuation
author_facet Kristen Lagasse Burke
Lauren Thaxton
Joseph E. Potter
author_sort Kristen Lagasse Burke
title Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas
title_short Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas
title_full Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas
title_fullStr Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas
title_full_unstemmed Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas
title_sort short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in texas
publisher Elsevier
series Contraception: X
issn 2590-1516
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objective: The objective was to assess continuation of the pill, patch, ring or injectable (i.e., short-acting hormonal contraception); characteristics associated with discontinuation; and subsequent method use among low-income postpartum women in Texas. Study design: Using a 24-month cohort study of 1700 women who delivered in eight Texas hospitals and were uninsured or publicly insured at the time of delivery, we focused on 456 women who used short-acting hormonal contraception within 6 months after delivery. We classified this sample according to characteristics and method preference, and estimated rates of discontinuation and associated predictors using life tables and Cox models. We assessed reasons for discontinuation and subsequent contraceptive use among those who discontinued. Results: Roughly half used the pill and half used the injectable. One hundred seventy-eight (39%) expressed a baseline preference for the method they used, 162 (36%) preferred a long-acting reversible contraception method, and 41 (9%) preferred sterilization. After 1 year, 72% had discontinued [95% confidence interval (CI) 67.1–75.7]. Foreign-born Hispanic women were less likely to discontinue than U.S.-born Hispanics [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.65; 95% CI 0.50–0.84]. Those who wanted a more effective method (aHR, 1.44; 95% CI 1.12–1.85) and those who lost insurance coverage (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI 1.12–1.92) were more likely to discontinue. The most common reasons for discontinuation were side effects and access/cost. Of those who discontinued, 243 (68%) switched to a less effective or no method. Only 47 (13%) switched to their preferred method. Conclusions: Short-acting hormonal contraceptive discontinuation is high in this population. Many switch to less effective methods after discontinuation despite preferring methods at least as effective as the pill, patch, ring or injectable. Implications: Expanding contraceptive coverage in the 2 years after delivery should be a state and federal policy priority. In clinics, providers should discuss contraceptive preferences throughout pregnancy and the interpregnancy interval.
topic Postpartum contraception
Short-acting hormonal contraception
Contraceptive continuation
Contraceptive discontinuation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300356
work_keys_str_mv AT kristenlagasseburke shortactinghormonalcontraceptivecontinuationamonglowincomepostpartumwomenintexas
AT laurenthaxton shortactinghormonalcontraceptivecontinuationamonglowincomepostpartumwomenintexas
AT josephepotter shortactinghormonalcontraceptivecontinuationamonglowincomepostpartumwomenintexas
_version_ 1724343727880667136