Unplanned hospitalizations in patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with (chemo)radiotherapy with and without prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

• Main Authors: Beat Bojaxhiu, Binaya K. Shrestha, Pascal Luterbacher, Olgun Elicin, Mohamed Shelan, Andrew J. S. Macpherson, Benjamin Heimgartner, Roland Giger, Daniel M. Aebersold, Kathrin Zaugg
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2020-12-01
• Series: Radiation Oncology
• Subjects: Head and neck cancer; Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; Morbidity; PEG; Radiotherapy
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01727-9

Abstract Background Current studies about percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement report equivalent patient outcomes with prophylactic PEG tubes (pPEGs) versus common nutritional support. Unreported was if omitting a pPEG is associated with an increased risk of complications leading to a treatment-related unplanned hospitalization (TRUH). Methods TRUHs were retrospectively analyzed in patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (n = 310) undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy with (pPEG) or without PEG (nPEG). Results In 88 patients (28%), TRUH was reported. One of the leading causes of TRUH in nPEG patients was inadequate oral intake (n = 16, 13%), and in pPEG patients, complications after PEG tube insertion (n = 12, 10%). Risk factors for TRUH were poor performance status, tobacco use, and surgical procedures. Conclusions Omitting pPEG tube placement without increasing the risk of an unplanned hospitalization due to dysphagia, dehydration or malnutrition, is an option in patients being carefully monitored. Patients aged > 60 years with hypopharyngeal carcinoma, tobacco consumption, and poor performance status appear at risk of PEG tube-related complications leading to an unplanned hospitalization.