Identifying success criteria at the post-handover stage for international development projects

The question of how successful a project is beyond the handover stage is still echoing in the literature on project management and more magnified in international development (ID) projects. In addressing the question, this study aims to demonstrate the importance of time frame in assessing project...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johan Fahri, Julien Pollack, Duro Kolar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2020-11-01
Series:Construction Economics and Building
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/7289
id doaj-5aa53971d5784c298cc70576e8657e3e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5aa53971d5784c298cc70576e8657e3e2021-02-03T02:36:19ZengUTS ePRESSConstruction Economics and Building2204-90292020-11-0120410.5130/AJCEB.v20i4.7289Identifying success criteria at the post-handover stage for international development projectsJohan Fahri0Julien PollackDuro KolarUniversitas Khairun The question of how successful a project is beyond the handover stage is still echoing in the literature on project management and more magnified in international development (ID) projects. In addressing the question, this study aims to demonstrate the importance of time frame in assessing project success, particularly identifying the success criteria at the post-handover stages (outcome and impact stages). This study used a qualitative approach that was rooted in interpretivism, allowing the use of constructivist grounded theory method (CGTM) in an ID project as an example. The study identified eight success criteria: Convenience, Development, Documentation, Maintainability, New Capability, Price of Service or Product, Training, and Usability. The study also found that, first, each participant had different emphases on different success criteria; second, most of the identified success criteria were still under the outcome stage; and lastly, usability received the highest responses from the participants as the most concerned criterion at the post-handover stages. This last finding verified the importance of time frame where the other criteria became less important if the outputs were useful to deliver the institutions’ strategic objectives. Future studies that use more sampled participants and different types of institutions are also encouraged. https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/7289Success criteria, post-handover stage, international development projects.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johan Fahri
Julien Pollack
Duro Kolar
spellingShingle Johan Fahri
Julien Pollack
Duro Kolar
Identifying success criteria at the post-handover stage for international development projects
Construction Economics and Building
Success criteria, post-handover stage, international development projects.
author_facet Johan Fahri
Julien Pollack
Duro Kolar
author_sort Johan Fahri
title Identifying success criteria at the post-handover stage for international development projects
title_short Identifying success criteria at the post-handover stage for international development projects
title_full Identifying success criteria at the post-handover stage for international development projects
title_fullStr Identifying success criteria at the post-handover stage for international development projects
title_full_unstemmed Identifying success criteria at the post-handover stage for international development projects
title_sort identifying success criteria at the post-handover stage for international development projects
publisher UTS ePRESS
series Construction Economics and Building
issn 2204-9029
publishDate 2020-11-01
description The question of how successful a project is beyond the handover stage is still echoing in the literature on project management and more magnified in international development (ID) projects. In addressing the question, this study aims to demonstrate the importance of time frame in assessing project success, particularly identifying the success criteria at the post-handover stages (outcome and impact stages). This study used a qualitative approach that was rooted in interpretivism, allowing the use of constructivist grounded theory method (CGTM) in an ID project as an example. The study identified eight success criteria: Convenience, Development, Documentation, Maintainability, New Capability, Price of Service or Product, Training, and Usability. The study also found that, first, each participant had different emphases on different success criteria; second, most of the identified success criteria were still under the outcome stage; and lastly, usability received the highest responses from the participants as the most concerned criterion at the post-handover stages. This last finding verified the importance of time frame where the other criteria became less important if the outputs were useful to deliver the institutions’ strategic objectives. Future studies that use more sampled participants and different types of institutions are also encouraged.
topic Success criteria, post-handover stage, international development projects.
url https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/7289
work_keys_str_mv AT johanfahri identifyingsuccesscriteriaattheposthandoverstageforinternationaldevelopmentprojects
AT julienpollack identifyingsuccesscriteriaattheposthandoverstageforinternationaldevelopmentprojects
AT durokolar identifyingsuccesscriteriaattheposthandoverstageforinternationaldevelopmentprojects
_version_ 1724289504520437760