Error Analysis for Determination of Accuracy of Johnson’s Formula, Dare’s Formula and Mother's Opinion for the Estimation of Birth Weight: Results of an Iranian Cross‐Sectional Study

Accurate fetal weight estimation is important for the management of birth. According to the existing literature, none of the clinical techniques is superior to any other. This study aimed to compare error analysis for the determination of the accuracy of Johnson’s formula, Dare’s formula and mother&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alirezaei Somayeh, Azmoude Elham, Ghaderi Asma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-12-01
Series:Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/afmnai.2018.35.issue-4/afmnai-2018-0034/afmnai-2018-0034.xml?format=INT
id doaj-5acd7f05daa746af8c89a1bb8f164d0b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5acd7f05daa746af8c89a1bb8f164d0b2020-11-25T00:26:09ZengSciendoActa Facultatis Medicae Naissensis2217-25212018-12-0135432032910.2478/afmnai-2018-0034afmnai-2018-0034Error Analysis for Determination of Accuracy of Johnson’s Formula, Dare’s Formula and Mother's Opinion for the Estimation of Birth Weight: Results of an Iranian Cross‐Sectional StudyAlirezaei Somayeh0Azmoude Elham1Ghaderi Asma2Ph.D. Student in Reproductive Health, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences,Mashhad, IranDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences,Torbat Heydariyeh, IranStudent Research Committee, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences,Torbat Heydariyeh, IranAccurate fetal weight estimation is important for the management of birth. According to the existing literature, none of the clinical techniques is superior to any other. This study aimed to compare error analysis for the determination of the accuracy of Johnson’s formula, Dare’s formula and mother's opinion for the estimation of birth weight. A cross-sectional study involving 147 full-term, cephalic, singleton pregnancies, was performed. The mother’s opinion was recorded and Johnson’s and Dare’s formulas were used to calculate the fetal weight. Accuracy was determined by percentage error, absolute percentage error, and proportion of estimates within 10% of actual birth-weight. Statistical analysis was done using the RM ANOVA, Friedman and Cochran. P < 0.05 was considered significant. The birth weight was correctly estimated in 34.7%, 58.5%, 66% of the cases using the mother’s estimate, Dare’s and Johnson’s formulas. Respectively the proportion of the mother's estimate and Dare’s formula was significantly lower than that of Johnson’s formula for all birth weights. No significant difference was observed in all the measures of accuracy for the low birth-weight range. The mean error of Johnson's formula in both normal weight and macrosomic groups was less than those obtained by the Dare's formula and mother's opinion. The Johnson’s formula is more accurate in actual birth weight estimation than the Dare ’s one and mother's opinion. In the normal weight range, Johnson’s formula is more accurate of the two, while in the macrosomic group, Dare’s formula appears to be more accurate.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/afmnai.2018.35.issue-4/afmnai-2018-0034/afmnai-2018-0034.xml?format=INTfetal weightbirth weightIran
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alirezaei Somayeh
Azmoude Elham
Ghaderi Asma
spellingShingle Alirezaei Somayeh
Azmoude Elham
Ghaderi Asma
Error Analysis for Determination of Accuracy of Johnson’s Formula, Dare’s Formula and Mother's Opinion for the Estimation of Birth Weight: Results of an Iranian Cross‐Sectional Study
Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis
fetal weight
birth weight
Iran
author_facet Alirezaei Somayeh
Azmoude Elham
Ghaderi Asma
author_sort Alirezaei Somayeh
title Error Analysis for Determination of Accuracy of Johnson’s Formula, Dare’s Formula and Mother's Opinion for the Estimation of Birth Weight: Results of an Iranian Cross‐Sectional Study
title_short Error Analysis for Determination of Accuracy of Johnson’s Formula, Dare’s Formula and Mother's Opinion for the Estimation of Birth Weight: Results of an Iranian Cross‐Sectional Study
title_full Error Analysis for Determination of Accuracy of Johnson’s Formula, Dare’s Formula and Mother's Opinion for the Estimation of Birth Weight: Results of an Iranian Cross‐Sectional Study
title_fullStr Error Analysis for Determination of Accuracy of Johnson’s Formula, Dare’s Formula and Mother's Opinion for the Estimation of Birth Weight: Results of an Iranian Cross‐Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Error Analysis for Determination of Accuracy of Johnson’s Formula, Dare’s Formula and Mother's Opinion for the Estimation of Birth Weight: Results of an Iranian Cross‐Sectional Study
title_sort error analysis for determination of accuracy of johnson’s formula, dare’s formula and mother's opinion for the estimation of birth weight: results of an iranian cross‐sectional study
publisher Sciendo
series Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis
issn 2217-2521
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Accurate fetal weight estimation is important for the management of birth. According to the existing literature, none of the clinical techniques is superior to any other. This study aimed to compare error analysis for the determination of the accuracy of Johnson’s formula, Dare’s formula and mother's opinion for the estimation of birth weight. A cross-sectional study involving 147 full-term, cephalic, singleton pregnancies, was performed. The mother’s opinion was recorded and Johnson’s and Dare’s formulas were used to calculate the fetal weight. Accuracy was determined by percentage error, absolute percentage error, and proportion of estimates within 10% of actual birth-weight. Statistical analysis was done using the RM ANOVA, Friedman and Cochran. P < 0.05 was considered significant. The birth weight was correctly estimated in 34.7%, 58.5%, 66% of the cases using the mother’s estimate, Dare’s and Johnson’s formulas. Respectively the proportion of the mother's estimate and Dare’s formula was significantly lower than that of Johnson’s formula for all birth weights. No significant difference was observed in all the measures of accuracy for the low birth-weight range. The mean error of Johnson's formula in both normal weight and macrosomic groups was less than those obtained by the Dare's formula and mother's opinion. The Johnson’s formula is more accurate in actual birth weight estimation than the Dare ’s one and mother's opinion. In the normal weight range, Johnson’s formula is more accurate of the two, while in the macrosomic group, Dare’s formula appears to be more accurate.
topic fetal weight
birth weight
Iran
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/afmnai.2018.35.issue-4/afmnai-2018-0034/afmnai-2018-0034.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezaeisomayeh erroranalysisfordeterminationofaccuracyofjohnsonsformuladaresformulaandmothersopinionfortheestimationofbirthweightresultsofaniraniancrosssectionalstudy
AT azmoudeelham erroranalysisfordeterminationofaccuracyofjohnsonsformuladaresformulaandmothersopinionfortheestimationofbirthweightresultsofaniraniancrosssectionalstudy
AT ghaderiasma erroranalysisfordeterminationofaccuracyofjohnsonsformuladaresformulaandmothersopinionfortheestimationofbirthweightresultsofaniraniancrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1725345687109894144