Uncertainties in Classification System Conversion and an Analysis of Inconsistencies in Global Land Cover Products

In this study, using the common classification systems of IGBP-17, IGBP-9, IPCC-5 and TC (vegetation, wetlands and others only), we studied spatial and areal inconsistencies in the three most recent multi-resource land cover products in a complex mountain-oasis-desert system and quantitatively discu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miao Zhang, Mingguo Ma, Philippe De Maeyer, Alishir Kurban
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-04-01
Series:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/6/4/112
id doaj-5b1c251c8b1f4948af684a1e698102cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b1c251c8b1f4948af684a1e698102cb2020-11-24T21:24:55ZengMDPI AGISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information2220-99642017-04-016411210.3390/ijgi6040112ijgi6040112Uncertainties in Classification System Conversion and an Analysis of Inconsistencies in Global Land Cover ProductsMiao Zhang0Mingguo Ma1Philippe De Maeyer2Alishir Kurban3State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, No. 818 South Beijing Road, Urumqi 830011, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, No. 818 South Beijing Road, Urumqi 830011, ChinaDepartment of Geography, Gent University, Krijgslaan 281, Ghent B-9000, BelgiumState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, No. 818 South Beijing Road, Urumqi 830011, ChinaIn this study, using the common classification systems of IGBP-17, IGBP-9, IPCC-5 and TC (vegetation, wetlands and others only), we studied spatial and areal inconsistencies in the three most recent multi-resource land cover products in a complex mountain-oasis-desert system and quantitatively discussed the uncertainties in classification system conversion. This is the first study to compare these products based on terrain and to quantitatively study the uncertainties in classification system conversion. The inconsistencies and uncertainties decreased from high to low levels of aggregation (IGBP-17 to TC) and from mountain to desert areas, indicating that the inconsistencies are not only influenced by the level of thematic detail and landscape complexity but also related to the conversion uncertainties. The overall areal inconsistency in the comparison of the FROM-GLC and GlobCover 2009 datasets is the smallest among the three pairs, but the smallest overall spatial inconsistency was observed between the FROM-GLC and MODISLC. The GlobCover 2009 had the largest conversion uncertainties due to mosaic land cover definition, with values up to 23.9%, 9.68% and 0.11% in mountainous, oasis and desert areas, respectively. The FROM-GLC had the smallest inconsistency, with values less than 4.58%, 1.89% and 1.2% in corresponding areas. Because the FROM-GLC dataset uses a hierarchical classification scheme with explicit attribution from the second level to the first, this system is suggested for producers of map land cover products in the future.http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/6/4/112multi-resource land cover productsinconsistencyclassification system conversion uncertaintiesarid regionremote sensing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miao Zhang
Mingguo Ma
Philippe De Maeyer
Alishir Kurban
spellingShingle Miao Zhang
Mingguo Ma
Philippe De Maeyer
Alishir Kurban
Uncertainties in Classification System Conversion and an Analysis of Inconsistencies in Global Land Cover Products
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
multi-resource land cover products
inconsistency
classification system conversion uncertainties
arid region
remote sensing
author_facet Miao Zhang
Mingguo Ma
Philippe De Maeyer
Alishir Kurban
author_sort Miao Zhang
title Uncertainties in Classification System Conversion and an Analysis of Inconsistencies in Global Land Cover Products
title_short Uncertainties in Classification System Conversion and an Analysis of Inconsistencies in Global Land Cover Products
title_full Uncertainties in Classification System Conversion and an Analysis of Inconsistencies in Global Land Cover Products
title_fullStr Uncertainties in Classification System Conversion and an Analysis of Inconsistencies in Global Land Cover Products
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainties in Classification System Conversion and an Analysis of Inconsistencies in Global Land Cover Products
title_sort uncertainties in classification system conversion and an analysis of inconsistencies in global land cover products
publisher MDPI AG
series ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
issn 2220-9964
publishDate 2017-04-01
description In this study, using the common classification systems of IGBP-17, IGBP-9, IPCC-5 and TC (vegetation, wetlands and others only), we studied spatial and areal inconsistencies in the three most recent multi-resource land cover products in a complex mountain-oasis-desert system and quantitatively discussed the uncertainties in classification system conversion. This is the first study to compare these products based on terrain and to quantitatively study the uncertainties in classification system conversion. The inconsistencies and uncertainties decreased from high to low levels of aggregation (IGBP-17 to TC) and from mountain to desert areas, indicating that the inconsistencies are not only influenced by the level of thematic detail and landscape complexity but also related to the conversion uncertainties. The overall areal inconsistency in the comparison of the FROM-GLC and GlobCover 2009 datasets is the smallest among the three pairs, but the smallest overall spatial inconsistency was observed between the FROM-GLC and MODISLC. The GlobCover 2009 had the largest conversion uncertainties due to mosaic land cover definition, with values up to 23.9%, 9.68% and 0.11% in mountainous, oasis and desert areas, respectively. The FROM-GLC had the smallest inconsistency, with values less than 4.58%, 1.89% and 1.2% in corresponding areas. Because the FROM-GLC dataset uses a hierarchical classification scheme with explicit attribution from the second level to the first, this system is suggested for producers of map land cover products in the future.
topic multi-resource land cover products
inconsistency
classification system conversion uncertainties
arid region
remote sensing
url http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/6/4/112
work_keys_str_mv AT miaozhang uncertaintiesinclassificationsystemconversionandananalysisofinconsistenciesingloballandcoverproducts
AT mingguoma uncertaintiesinclassificationsystemconversionandananalysisofinconsistenciesingloballandcoverproducts
AT philippedemaeyer uncertaintiesinclassificationsystemconversionandananalysisofinconsistenciesingloballandcoverproducts
AT alishirkurban uncertaintiesinclassificationsystemconversionandananalysisofinconsistenciesingloballandcoverproducts
_version_ 1725986091232657408