Relationship between disease severity and D-dimer levels measured with two different methods in pulmonary embolism patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is diagnosed with increasing frequency nowadays due to advances in the diagnostic methods and the increased awareness of the disease. There is a tendency to use non invasive diagnostic methods for all diseases. D-dimer is a fibrin degradat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coskun Funda, Yilmaz Dilber, Ursavas Ahmet, Uzaslan Esra, Ege Ercument
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2010-06-01
Series:Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mrmjournal.com/content/5/3/168
id doaj-5b5e1bb357614cb688df6171741e9109
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b5e1bb357614cb688df6171741e91092020-11-25T03:31:48ZengPAGEPress PublicationsMultidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine2049-69582010-06-015316817210.1186/2049-6958-5-3-168Relationship between disease severity and D-dimer levels measured with two different methods in pulmonary embolism patientsCoskun FundaYilmaz DilberUrsavas AhmetUzaslan EsraEge Ercument<p>Abstract</p> <p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is diagnosed with increasing frequency nowadays due to advances in the diagnostic methods and the increased awareness of the disease. There is a tendency to use non invasive diagnostic methods for all diseases. D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product. We aimed to detect the relationship between disease severity and the D-dimer levels measured with two different methods. We compared D-dimer levels in cases of massive vs. non-massive PE. A total of 89 patients who were diagnosed between 2006 and 2008 were included in the study. Group 1 included patients whose D-dimer levels were measured with the immunoturbidimetric polyclonal antibody method (D-dimerPLUS<sup>®</sup>), while Group 2 patients made use of the immunoturbidimetric monoclonal antibody method (InnovanceD-DIMER<sup>®</sup>). In each group, the D-dimer levels of those with massive and non-massive PE were compared, using the Mann Whitney U test. The mean age of Group 1 (25 F/26 M) was 56.0 ± 17.9 years, and that of Group 2 (22 F/16 M) was 52.9 ± 17.9 years. There was no statistical difference in gender and mean age between the two groups (p > 0.05). In Group 1, the mean D-dimer level of massive cases (n = 7) was 1444.9 ± 657.9 μg/L and that of nonmassive PE (n = 34) was 1304.7 ± 350.5 μg/L (p > 0.05). In Group 2, the mean D-dimer level of massive cases (n = 6) was 9.7 ± 2.2 mg/L and that of non-massive PE (n = 32) was 5.9 ± 1.3 mg/L (p < 0.05). The mean D-dimer levels of massive cases as measured with the immunoturbidimetric monoclonal antibody method were significantly higher. Pulmonary embolism patients whose D-dimer levels are higher (especially higher than 6.6 mg/L) should be considered as possibly having massive embolism. Diagnostic procedures and management can be planned according to this finding.</p> http://www.mrmjournal.com/content/5/3/168D-dimermassive pulmonary embolismpulmonary embolism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Coskun Funda
Yilmaz Dilber
Ursavas Ahmet
Uzaslan Esra
Ege Ercument
spellingShingle Coskun Funda
Yilmaz Dilber
Ursavas Ahmet
Uzaslan Esra
Ege Ercument
Relationship between disease severity and D-dimer levels measured with two different methods in pulmonary embolism patients
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
D-dimer
massive pulmonary embolism
pulmonary embolism
author_facet Coskun Funda
Yilmaz Dilber
Ursavas Ahmet
Uzaslan Esra
Ege Ercument
author_sort Coskun Funda
title Relationship between disease severity and D-dimer levels measured with two different methods in pulmonary embolism patients
title_short Relationship between disease severity and D-dimer levels measured with two different methods in pulmonary embolism patients
title_full Relationship between disease severity and D-dimer levels measured with two different methods in pulmonary embolism patients
title_fullStr Relationship between disease severity and D-dimer levels measured with two different methods in pulmonary embolism patients
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between disease severity and D-dimer levels measured with two different methods in pulmonary embolism patients
title_sort relationship between disease severity and d-dimer levels measured with two different methods in pulmonary embolism patients
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
issn 2049-6958
publishDate 2010-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is diagnosed with increasing frequency nowadays due to advances in the diagnostic methods and the increased awareness of the disease. There is a tendency to use non invasive diagnostic methods for all diseases. D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product. We aimed to detect the relationship between disease severity and the D-dimer levels measured with two different methods. We compared D-dimer levels in cases of massive vs. non-massive PE. A total of 89 patients who were diagnosed between 2006 and 2008 were included in the study. Group 1 included patients whose D-dimer levels were measured with the immunoturbidimetric polyclonal antibody method (D-dimerPLUS<sup>®</sup>), while Group 2 patients made use of the immunoturbidimetric monoclonal antibody method (InnovanceD-DIMER<sup>®</sup>). In each group, the D-dimer levels of those with massive and non-massive PE were compared, using the Mann Whitney U test. The mean age of Group 1 (25 F/26 M) was 56.0 ± 17.9 years, and that of Group 2 (22 F/16 M) was 52.9 ± 17.9 years. There was no statistical difference in gender and mean age between the two groups (p > 0.05). In Group 1, the mean D-dimer level of massive cases (n = 7) was 1444.9 ± 657.9 μg/L and that of nonmassive PE (n = 34) was 1304.7 ± 350.5 μg/L (p > 0.05). In Group 2, the mean D-dimer level of massive cases (n = 6) was 9.7 ± 2.2 mg/L and that of non-massive PE (n = 32) was 5.9 ± 1.3 mg/L (p < 0.05). The mean D-dimer levels of massive cases as measured with the immunoturbidimetric monoclonal antibody method were significantly higher. Pulmonary embolism patients whose D-dimer levels are higher (especially higher than 6.6 mg/L) should be considered as possibly having massive embolism. Diagnostic procedures and management can be planned according to this finding.</p>
topic D-dimer
massive pulmonary embolism
pulmonary embolism
url http://www.mrmjournal.com/content/5/3/168
work_keys_str_mv AT coskunfunda relationshipbetweendiseaseseverityandddimerlevelsmeasuredwithtwodifferentmethodsinpulmonaryembolismpatients
AT yilmazdilber relationshipbetweendiseaseseverityandddimerlevelsmeasuredwithtwodifferentmethodsinpulmonaryembolismpatients
AT ursavasahmet relationshipbetweendiseaseseverityandddimerlevelsmeasuredwithtwodifferentmethodsinpulmonaryembolismpatients
AT uzaslanesra relationshipbetweendiseaseseverityandddimerlevelsmeasuredwithtwodifferentmethodsinpulmonaryembolismpatients
AT egeercument relationshipbetweendiseaseseverityandddimerlevelsmeasuredwithtwodifferentmethodsinpulmonaryembolismpatients
_version_ 1724571533768130560