Comparative analysis of US real-world dosing patterns and direct infusion-related costs for matched cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab or intravenous golimumab

Lorie A Ellis,1 Elisabetta Malangone-Monaco,2 Helen Varker,3 Diana Stetsovsky,3 Maureen Kubacki,1 Raphael J DeHoratius,1,4 Shelly Kafka1 1Real World Value and Evidence, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA; 2Life Sciences, IBM Watson Health, Armonk, NY, USA; 3Life Sciences, IBM Watson H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ellis LA, Malangone-Monaco E, Varker H, Stetsovsky D, Kubacki M, DeHoratius RJ, Kafka S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-01-01
Series:ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/comparative-analysis-of-us-real-world-dosing-patterns-and-direct-infus-peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
id doaj-5b7289f9033d4b4189b710f369c3f10d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b7289f9033d4b4189b710f369c3f10d2020-11-24T23:58:42ZengDove Medical PressClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research1178-69812019-01-01Volume 119911043594Comparative analysis of US real-world dosing patterns and direct infusion-related costs for matched cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab or intravenous golimumabEllis LAMalangone-Monaco EVarker HStetsovsky DKubacki MDeHoratius RJKafka SLorie A Ellis,1 Elisabetta Malangone-Monaco,2 Helen Varker,3 Diana Stetsovsky,3 Maureen Kubacki,1 Raphael J DeHoratius,1,4 Shelly Kafka1 1Real World Value and Evidence, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA; 2Life Sciences, IBM Watson Health, Armonk, NY, USA; 3Life Sciences, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA; 4Janssen Immunology, Medical Affairs, Sidney Kimmel School of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Purpose: The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare treatment patterns and infusion-related health care resource expenditures for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating golimumab for intravenous use (GLM-IV) and infliximab (IFX) therapy and to assess cost implications from the commercial perspective.Methods: Adult RA patients with a new episode of GLM-IV or IFX treatment between January 1, 2014 and March 31, 2016 were identified from MarketScan databases and evaluated for maintenance infusion intervals and related costs of treatment. IFX and GLM-IV patients were matched 1:1 on index medication treatment duration, gender, payer type, prior biologic use, and post-index methotrexate use. Paid amounts for drugs and associated administration costs were applied to treatment group dosing patterns.Results: Final matched treatment groups included 547 GLM-IV and 547 IFX patients (mean age = 55–56 years). Mean (SD) follow-up was 609 (161) days for GLM-IV and 613 (163) days for IFX. Treatment duration was 396 (240) days for GLM-IV and 397 (239) days for IFX. Overall, 80% of GLM-IV and 39% of IFX maintenance infusions were given approximately every 8 weeks; and 6% of GLM-IV and 53% of IFX maintenance infusions occurred more frequently than every 8 weeks (P<0.001). When weighting of the maintenance infusion interval was applied, the mean number of induction plus maintenance infusions during the first year of treatment was estimated at 7.03 for GLM-IV and 9.48 for IFX. From the commercial perspective, drug plus administration costs per infusion were $5,846 for GLM-IV and $5,444 for IFX with total annual cost of therapy for GLM-IV patients costing $10,507 less than that for IFX patients in the first year and $6,774 less than that for IFX patients in subsequent years.Conclusion: Annual GLM-IV drug plus administration costs for commercial health plans were significantly less than IFX in RA patients due to differences in real-world dosing and administration. Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, infliximab, golimumab, dosing, treatment patternshttps://www.dovepress.com/comparative-analysis-of-us-real-world-dosing-patterns-and-direct-infus-peer-reviewed-article-CEORRheumatoid arthritisinfliximabgolimumabdosingtreatment patterns
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ellis LA
Malangone-Monaco E
Varker H
Stetsovsky D
Kubacki M
DeHoratius RJ
Kafka S
spellingShingle Ellis LA
Malangone-Monaco E
Varker H
Stetsovsky D
Kubacki M
DeHoratius RJ
Kafka S
Comparative analysis of US real-world dosing patterns and direct infusion-related costs for matched cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab or intravenous golimumab
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Rheumatoid arthritis
infliximab
golimumab
dosing
treatment patterns
author_facet Ellis LA
Malangone-Monaco E
Varker H
Stetsovsky D
Kubacki M
DeHoratius RJ
Kafka S
author_sort Ellis LA
title Comparative analysis of US real-world dosing patterns and direct infusion-related costs for matched cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab or intravenous golimumab
title_short Comparative analysis of US real-world dosing patterns and direct infusion-related costs for matched cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab or intravenous golimumab
title_full Comparative analysis of US real-world dosing patterns and direct infusion-related costs for matched cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab or intravenous golimumab
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of US real-world dosing patterns and direct infusion-related costs for matched cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab or intravenous golimumab
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of US real-world dosing patterns and direct infusion-related costs for matched cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab or intravenous golimumab
title_sort comparative analysis of us real-world dosing patterns and direct infusion-related costs for matched cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab or intravenous golimumab
publisher Dove Medical Press
series ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
issn 1178-6981
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Lorie A Ellis,1 Elisabetta Malangone-Monaco,2 Helen Varker,3 Diana Stetsovsky,3 Maureen Kubacki,1 Raphael J DeHoratius,1,4 Shelly Kafka1 1Real World Value and Evidence, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA; 2Life Sciences, IBM Watson Health, Armonk, NY, USA; 3Life Sciences, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA; 4Janssen Immunology, Medical Affairs, Sidney Kimmel School of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Purpose: The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare treatment patterns and infusion-related health care resource expenditures for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating golimumab for intravenous use (GLM-IV) and infliximab (IFX) therapy and to assess cost implications from the commercial perspective.Methods: Adult RA patients with a new episode of GLM-IV or IFX treatment between January 1, 2014 and March 31, 2016 were identified from MarketScan databases and evaluated for maintenance infusion intervals and related costs of treatment. IFX and GLM-IV patients were matched 1:1 on index medication treatment duration, gender, payer type, prior biologic use, and post-index methotrexate use. Paid amounts for drugs and associated administration costs were applied to treatment group dosing patterns.Results: Final matched treatment groups included 547 GLM-IV and 547 IFX patients (mean age = 55–56 years). Mean (SD) follow-up was 609 (161) days for GLM-IV and 613 (163) days for IFX. Treatment duration was 396 (240) days for GLM-IV and 397 (239) days for IFX. Overall, 80% of GLM-IV and 39% of IFX maintenance infusions were given approximately every 8 weeks; and 6% of GLM-IV and 53% of IFX maintenance infusions occurred more frequently than every 8 weeks (P<0.001). When weighting of the maintenance infusion interval was applied, the mean number of induction plus maintenance infusions during the first year of treatment was estimated at 7.03 for GLM-IV and 9.48 for IFX. From the commercial perspective, drug plus administration costs per infusion were $5,846 for GLM-IV and $5,444 for IFX with total annual cost of therapy for GLM-IV patients costing $10,507 less than that for IFX patients in the first year and $6,774 less than that for IFX patients in subsequent years.Conclusion: Annual GLM-IV drug plus administration costs for commercial health plans were significantly less than IFX in RA patients due to differences in real-world dosing and administration. Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, infliximab, golimumab, dosing, treatment patterns
topic Rheumatoid arthritis
infliximab
golimumab
dosing
treatment patterns
url https://www.dovepress.com/comparative-analysis-of-us-real-world-dosing-patterns-and-direct-infus-peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
work_keys_str_mv AT ellisla comparativeanalysisofusrealworlddosingpatternsanddirectinfusionrelatedcostsformatchedcohortsofrheumatoidarthritispatientstreatedwithinfliximaborintravenousgolimumab
AT malangonemonacoe comparativeanalysisofusrealworlddosingpatternsanddirectinfusionrelatedcostsformatchedcohortsofrheumatoidarthritispatientstreatedwithinfliximaborintravenousgolimumab
AT varkerh comparativeanalysisofusrealworlddosingpatternsanddirectinfusionrelatedcostsformatchedcohortsofrheumatoidarthritispatientstreatedwithinfliximaborintravenousgolimumab
AT stetsovskyd comparativeanalysisofusrealworlddosingpatternsanddirectinfusionrelatedcostsformatchedcohortsofrheumatoidarthritispatientstreatedwithinfliximaborintravenousgolimumab
AT kubackim comparativeanalysisofusrealworlddosingpatternsanddirectinfusionrelatedcostsformatchedcohortsofrheumatoidarthritispatientstreatedwithinfliximaborintravenousgolimumab
AT dehoratiusrj comparativeanalysisofusrealworlddosingpatternsanddirectinfusionrelatedcostsformatchedcohortsofrheumatoidarthritispatientstreatedwithinfliximaborintravenousgolimumab
AT kafkas comparativeanalysisofusrealworlddosingpatternsanddirectinfusionrelatedcostsformatchedcohortsofrheumatoidarthritispatientstreatedwithinfliximaborintravenousgolimumab
_version_ 1725450227521945600