Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study

Abstract Aim Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and thus the literature is sparse with regard to histological types, staging, and prognosis. In particular, it is unclear how long‐term outcome may differ between mucinous adenocarcinomas and other adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we aimed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toshinori Sueda, Kohei Murata, Takashi Takeda, Yoshinori Kagawa, Junichi Hasegawa, Takamichi Komori, Shingo Noura, Kimimasa Ikeda, Masaki Tsujie, Masayuki Ohue, Hirofumi Ota, Masakazu Ikenaga, Taishi Hata, Chu Matsuda, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Hirofumi Yamamoto, Mitsugu Sekimoto, Riichiro Nezu, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-05-01
Series:Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12241
id doaj-5b9e0f2c5b874e1199d78009153ec67d
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Toshinori Sueda
Kohei Murata
Takashi Takeda
Yoshinori Kagawa
Junichi Hasegawa
Takamichi Komori
Shingo Noura
Kimimasa Ikeda
Masaki Tsujie
Masayuki Ohue
Hirofumi Ota
Masakazu Ikenaga
Taishi Hata
Chu Matsuda
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hirofumi Yamamoto
Mitsugu Sekimoto
Riichiro Nezu
Masaki Mori
Yuichiro Doki
spellingShingle Toshinori Sueda
Kohei Murata
Takashi Takeda
Yoshinori Kagawa
Junichi Hasegawa
Takamichi Komori
Shingo Noura
Kimimasa Ikeda
Masaki Tsujie
Masayuki Ohue
Hirofumi Ota
Masakazu Ikenaga
Taishi Hata
Chu Matsuda
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hirofumi Yamamoto
Mitsugu Sekimoto
Riichiro Nezu
Masaki Mori
Yuichiro Doki
Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
appendiceal carcinoma
mucinous
non‐mucinous
prognosis
survival outcomes
author_facet Toshinori Sueda
Kohei Murata
Takashi Takeda
Yoshinori Kagawa
Junichi Hasegawa
Takamichi Komori
Shingo Noura
Kimimasa Ikeda
Masaki Tsujie
Masayuki Ohue
Hirofumi Ota
Masakazu Ikenaga
Taishi Hata
Chu Matsuda
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hirofumi Yamamoto
Mitsugu Sekimoto
Riichiro Nezu
Masaki Mori
Yuichiro Doki
author_sort Toshinori Sueda
title Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_short Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_full Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_fullStr Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
title_sort survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
publisher Wiley
series Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
issn 2475-0328
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Aim Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and thus the literature is sparse with regard to histological types, staging, and prognosis. In particular, it is unclear how long‐term outcome may differ between mucinous adenocarcinomas and other adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the histological types and stages of appendiceal neoplasms, and to evaluate the prognostic impacts of these factors in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas and non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Methods Patients with appendiceal tumors diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from the databases of 19 institutions in the Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Colorectal Group. Results A total of 266 patients with appendiceal tumors were identified, of whom 130 had pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinomas, including 57 with mucinous adenocarcinomas and 73 with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Five‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 64.5% for mucinous adenocarcinomas, and 49.0% for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. OS was significantly shorter among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Among patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 53.6% for stage 0/I, 82.6% for II/III, and 48.4% for IV. Among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 90.9% for stage 0/I, 68.8% for II/III, and 7.1% for IV. Analysis of patients with stage IV disease revealed significantly shorter OS among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Conclusion Our present findings showed a better prognosis in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. In this setting, Union for International Cancer Control staging was associated with prognosis for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, but not for mucinous adenocarcinomas.
topic appendiceal carcinoma
mucinous
non‐mucinous
prognosis
survival outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12241
work_keys_str_mv AT toshinorisueda survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT koheimurata survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT takashitakeda survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT yoshinorikagawa survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT junichihasegawa survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT takamichikomori survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT shingonoura survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT kimimasaikeda survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT masakitsujie survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT masayukiohue survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT hirofumiota survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT masakazuikenaga survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT taishihata survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT chumatsuda survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT tsunekazumizushima survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT hirofumiyamamoto survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT mitsugusekimoto survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT riichironezu survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT masakimori survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT yuichirodoki survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy
_version_ 1721491276322308096
spelling doaj-5b9e0f2c5b874e1199d78009153ec67d2021-05-02T12:52:48ZengWileyAnnals of Gastroenterological Surgery2475-03282019-05-013329130010.1002/ags3.12241Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical studyToshinori Sueda0Kohei Murata1Takashi Takeda2Yoshinori Kagawa3Junichi Hasegawa4Takamichi Komori5Shingo Noura6Kimimasa Ikeda7Masaki Tsujie8Masayuki Ohue9Hirofumi Ota10Masakazu Ikenaga11Taishi Hata12Chu Matsuda13Tsunekazu Mizushima14Hirofumi Yamamoto15Mitsugu Sekimoto16Riichiro Nezu17Masaki Mori18Yuichiro Doki19Colorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanAbstract Aim Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and thus the literature is sparse with regard to histological types, staging, and prognosis. In particular, it is unclear how long‐term outcome may differ between mucinous adenocarcinomas and other adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the histological types and stages of appendiceal neoplasms, and to evaluate the prognostic impacts of these factors in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas and non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Methods Patients with appendiceal tumors diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from the databases of 19 institutions in the Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Colorectal Group. Results A total of 266 patients with appendiceal tumors were identified, of whom 130 had pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinomas, including 57 with mucinous adenocarcinomas and 73 with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Five‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 64.5% for mucinous adenocarcinomas, and 49.0% for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. OS was significantly shorter among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Among patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 53.6% for stage 0/I, 82.6% for II/III, and 48.4% for IV. Among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 90.9% for stage 0/I, 68.8% for II/III, and 7.1% for IV. Analysis of patients with stage IV disease revealed significantly shorter OS among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Conclusion Our present findings showed a better prognosis in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. In this setting, Union for International Cancer Control staging was associated with prognosis for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, but not for mucinous adenocarcinomas.https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12241appendiceal carcinomamucinousnon‐mucinousprognosissurvival outcomes