Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study
Abstract Aim Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and thus the literature is sparse with regard to histological types, staging, and prognosis. In particular, it is unclear how long‐term outcome may differ between mucinous adenocarcinomas and other adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we aimed...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12241 |
id |
doaj-5b9e0f2c5b874e1199d78009153ec67d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Toshinori Sueda Kohei Murata Takashi Takeda Yoshinori Kagawa Junichi Hasegawa Takamichi Komori Shingo Noura Kimimasa Ikeda Masaki Tsujie Masayuki Ohue Hirofumi Ota Masakazu Ikenaga Taishi Hata Chu Matsuda Tsunekazu Mizushima Hirofumi Yamamoto Mitsugu Sekimoto Riichiro Nezu Masaki Mori Yuichiro Doki |
spellingShingle |
Toshinori Sueda Kohei Murata Takashi Takeda Yoshinori Kagawa Junichi Hasegawa Takamichi Komori Shingo Noura Kimimasa Ikeda Masaki Tsujie Masayuki Ohue Hirofumi Ota Masakazu Ikenaga Taishi Hata Chu Matsuda Tsunekazu Mizushima Hirofumi Yamamoto Mitsugu Sekimoto Riichiro Nezu Masaki Mori Yuichiro Doki Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery appendiceal carcinoma mucinous non‐mucinous prognosis survival outcomes |
author_facet |
Toshinori Sueda Kohei Murata Takashi Takeda Yoshinori Kagawa Junichi Hasegawa Takamichi Komori Shingo Noura Kimimasa Ikeda Masaki Tsujie Masayuki Ohue Hirofumi Ota Masakazu Ikenaga Taishi Hata Chu Matsuda Tsunekazu Mizushima Hirofumi Yamamoto Mitsugu Sekimoto Riichiro Nezu Masaki Mori Yuichiro Doki |
author_sort |
Toshinori Sueda |
title |
Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study |
title_short |
Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study |
title_full |
Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study |
title_fullStr |
Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study |
title_sort |
survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery |
issn |
2475-0328 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Aim Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and thus the literature is sparse with regard to histological types, staging, and prognosis. In particular, it is unclear how long‐term outcome may differ between mucinous adenocarcinomas and other adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the histological types and stages of appendiceal neoplasms, and to evaluate the prognostic impacts of these factors in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas and non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Methods Patients with appendiceal tumors diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from the databases of 19 institutions in the Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Colorectal Group. Results A total of 266 patients with appendiceal tumors were identified, of whom 130 had pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinomas, including 57 with mucinous adenocarcinomas and 73 with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Five‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 64.5% for mucinous adenocarcinomas, and 49.0% for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. OS was significantly shorter among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Among patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 53.6% for stage 0/I, 82.6% for II/III, and 48.4% for IV. Among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 90.9% for stage 0/I, 68.8% for II/III, and 7.1% for IV. Analysis of patients with stage IV disease revealed significantly shorter OS among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Conclusion Our present findings showed a better prognosis in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. In this setting, Union for International Cancer Control staging was associated with prognosis for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, but not for mucinous adenocarcinomas. |
topic |
appendiceal carcinoma mucinous non‐mucinous prognosis survival outcomes |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12241 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT toshinorisueda survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT koheimurata survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT takashitakeda survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT yoshinorikagawa survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT junichihasegawa survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT takamichikomori survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT shingonoura survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT kimimasaikeda survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT masakitsujie survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT masayukiohue survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT hirofumiota survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT masakazuikenaga survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT taishihata survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT chumatsuda survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT tsunekazumizushima survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT hirofumiyamamoto survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT mitsugusekimoto survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT riichironezu survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT masakimori survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy AT yuichirodoki survivaloutcomesofappendicealmucinousneoplasmsbyhistologicaltypeandstageanalysisof266casesinamulticentercollaborativeretrospectiveclinicalstudy |
_version_ |
1721491276322308096 |
spelling |
doaj-5b9e0f2c5b874e1199d78009153ec67d2021-05-02T12:52:48ZengWileyAnnals of Gastroenterological Surgery2475-03282019-05-013329130010.1002/ags3.12241Survival outcomes of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by histological type and stage: Analysis of 266 cases in a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical studyToshinori Sueda0Kohei Murata1Takashi Takeda2Yoshinori Kagawa3Junichi Hasegawa4Takamichi Komori5Shingo Noura6Kimimasa Ikeda7Masaki Tsujie8Masayuki Ohue9Hirofumi Ota10Masakazu Ikenaga11Taishi Hata12Chu Matsuda13Tsunekazu Mizushima14Hirofumi Yamamoto15Mitsugu Sekimoto16Riichiro Nezu17Masaki Mori18Yuichiro Doki19Colorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanColorectal Group Clinical Study Group of Osaka University (CSGO) Osaka JapanAbstract Aim Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare, and thus the literature is sparse with regard to histological types, staging, and prognosis. In particular, it is unclear how long‐term outcome may differ between mucinous adenocarcinomas and other adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the histological types and stages of appendiceal neoplasms, and to evaluate the prognostic impacts of these factors in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas and non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Methods Patients with appendiceal tumors diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from the databases of 19 institutions in the Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Colorectal Group. Results A total of 266 patients with appendiceal tumors were identified, of whom 130 had pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinomas, including 57 with mucinous adenocarcinomas and 73 with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. Five‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 64.5% for mucinous adenocarcinomas, and 49.0% for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. OS was significantly shorter among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Among patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 53.6% for stage 0/I, 82.6% for II/III, and 48.4% for IV. Among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, 5‐year OS rates were 90.9% for stage 0/I, 68.8% for II/III, and 7.1% for IV. Analysis of patients with stage IV disease revealed significantly shorter OS among patients with non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to mucinous adenocarcinomas. Conclusion Our present findings showed a better prognosis in patients with mucinous adenocarcinomas compared to non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas. In this setting, Union for International Cancer Control staging was associated with prognosis for non‐mucinous adenocarcinomas, but not for mucinous adenocarcinomas.https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12241appendiceal carcinomamucinousnon‐mucinousprognosissurvival outcomes |