Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study
Introduction: Despite radiography being the gold standard in evaluation of orthopedic injuries, using bedside<br />ultrasonography has several potential supremacies such as avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation, availability<br />in pre-hospital settings, being extensively accessible,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Emergency |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/emergency/article/view/12821 |
id |
doaj-5bd241137bcc42a29dcb7ef60c7a90e2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5bd241137bcc42a29dcb7ef60c7a90e22020-11-25T03:05:33ZengShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesEmergency2345-45632345-45712016-12-0151e15e1510.22037/emergency.v5i1.128217048Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series StudyFarzad BozorgiMassoud Shayesteh AzarSeyed Hossein MontazerAroona ChabraSeyed Farshad HeidariAlireza KhalilianIntroduction: Despite radiography being the gold standard in evaluation of orthopedic injuries, using bedside<br />ultrasonography has several potential supremacies such as avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation, availability<br />in pre-hospital settings, being extensively accessible, and ability to be used on the bedside. The aim of the<br />present study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in detection of extremity bone fractures.<br />Methods: This study is a case series study, which was prospectively conducted on multiple blunt trauma patients,<br />who were 18 years old or older, had stable hemodynamic, Glasgow coma scale 15, and signs or symptoms<br />of a possible extremity bone fracture. After initial assessment, ultrasonography of suspected bones was performed<br />by a trained emergency medicine resident and prevalence of true positive and false negative findings<br />were calculated compared to plain radiology. Results: 108 patients with the mean age of 44.6 § 20.4 years were<br />studied (67.6% male). Analysis was done on 158 sites of fracture, which were confirmed with plain radiography.<br />91 (57.6%) cases were suspected to have upper extremity fracture(s) and 67 (42.4%) to have lower ones.<br />The most frequent site of injuries were forearm (36.7%) in upper limbs and leg (27.8%) in lower limbs. Prevalence<br />of true positive and false negative cases for fractures detected by ultrasonography were 59 (64.8%) and 32<br />(35.52%) for upper and 49 (73.1%) and 18 (26.9%) for lower extremities, respectively. In addition, prevalence of<br />true positive and false negative detected cases for intra-articular fractures were 24 (48%) and 26 (52%), respectively.<br />Conclusion: The present study shows the moderate sensitivity (68.3%) of ultrasonography in detection<br />of different extremity bone fractures. Ultrasonography showed the best sensitivity in detection of femur (100%)<br />and humerus (76.2%) fractures, respectively. It had low sensitivity in detection of in intra-articular fractures.http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/emergency/article/view/12821Ultrasonographyradiographyfractures, bonediagnosisemergency service, hospital |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Farzad Bozorgi Massoud Shayesteh Azar Seyed Hossein Montazer Aroona Chabra Seyed Farshad Heidari Alireza Khalilian |
spellingShingle |
Farzad Bozorgi Massoud Shayesteh Azar Seyed Hossein Montazer Aroona Chabra Seyed Farshad Heidari Alireza Khalilian Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study Emergency Ultrasonography radiography fractures, bone diagnosis emergency service, hospital |
author_facet |
Farzad Bozorgi Massoud Shayesteh Azar Seyed Hossein Montazer Aroona Chabra Seyed Farshad Heidari Alireza Khalilian |
author_sort |
Farzad Bozorgi |
title |
Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study |
title_short |
Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study |
title_full |
Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study |
title_fullStr |
Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study |
title_sort |
ability of ultrasonography in detection of different extremity bone fractures; a case series study |
publisher |
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Emergency |
issn |
2345-4563 2345-4571 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Introduction: Despite radiography being the gold standard in evaluation of orthopedic injuries, using bedside<br />ultrasonography has several potential supremacies such as avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation, availability<br />in pre-hospital settings, being extensively accessible, and ability to be used on the bedside. The aim of the<br />present study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in detection of extremity bone fractures.<br />Methods: This study is a case series study, which was prospectively conducted on multiple blunt trauma patients,<br />who were 18 years old or older, had stable hemodynamic, Glasgow coma scale 15, and signs or symptoms<br />of a possible extremity bone fracture. After initial assessment, ultrasonography of suspected bones was performed<br />by a trained emergency medicine resident and prevalence of true positive and false negative findings<br />were calculated compared to plain radiology. Results: 108 patients with the mean age of 44.6 § 20.4 years were<br />studied (67.6% male). Analysis was done on 158 sites of fracture, which were confirmed with plain radiography.<br />91 (57.6%) cases were suspected to have upper extremity fracture(s) and 67 (42.4%) to have lower ones.<br />The most frequent site of injuries were forearm (36.7%) in upper limbs and leg (27.8%) in lower limbs. Prevalence<br />of true positive and false negative cases for fractures detected by ultrasonography were 59 (64.8%) and 32<br />(35.52%) for upper and 49 (73.1%) and 18 (26.9%) for lower extremities, respectively. In addition, prevalence of<br />true positive and false negative detected cases for intra-articular fractures were 24 (48%) and 26 (52%), respectively.<br />Conclusion: The present study shows the moderate sensitivity (68.3%) of ultrasonography in detection<br />of different extremity bone fractures. Ultrasonography showed the best sensitivity in detection of femur (100%)<br />and humerus (76.2%) fractures, respectively. It had low sensitivity in detection of in intra-articular fractures. |
topic |
Ultrasonography radiography fractures, bone diagnosis emergency service, hospital |
url |
http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/emergency/article/view/12821 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT farzadbozorgi abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy AT massoudshayestehazar abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy AT seyedhosseinmontazer abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy AT aroonachabra abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy AT seyedfarshadheidari abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy AT alirezakhalilian abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy |
_version_ |
1724677910392995840 |