Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study

Introduction: Despite radiography being the gold standard in evaluation of orthopedic injuries, using bedside<br />ultrasonography has several potential supremacies such as avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation, availability<br />in pre-hospital settings, being extensively accessible,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farzad Bozorgi, Massoud Shayesteh Azar, Seyed Hossein Montazer, Aroona Chabra, Seyed Farshad Heidari, Alireza Khalilian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2016-12-01
Series:Emergency
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/emergency/article/view/12821
id doaj-5bd241137bcc42a29dcb7ef60c7a90e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5bd241137bcc42a29dcb7ef60c7a90e22020-11-25T03:05:33ZengShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesEmergency2345-45632345-45712016-12-0151e15e1510.22037/emergency.v5i1.128217048Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series StudyFarzad BozorgiMassoud Shayesteh AzarSeyed Hossein MontazerAroona ChabraSeyed Farshad HeidariAlireza KhalilianIntroduction: Despite radiography being the gold standard in evaluation of orthopedic injuries, using bedside<br />ultrasonography has several potential supremacies such as avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation, availability<br />in pre-hospital settings, being extensively accessible, and ability to be used on the bedside. The aim of the<br />present study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in detection of extremity bone fractures.<br />Methods: This study is a case series study, which was prospectively conducted on multiple blunt trauma patients,<br />who were 18 years old or older, had stable hemodynamic, Glasgow coma scale 15, and signs or symptoms<br />of a possible extremity bone fracture. After initial assessment, ultrasonography of suspected bones was performed<br />by a trained emergency medicine resident and prevalence of true positive and false negative findings<br />were calculated compared to plain radiology. Results: 108 patients with the mean age of 44.6 § 20.4 years were<br />studied (67.6% male). Analysis was done on 158 sites of fracture, which were confirmed with plain radiography.<br />91 (57.6%) cases were suspected to have upper extremity fracture(s) and 67 (42.4%) to have lower ones.<br />The most frequent site of injuries were forearm (36.7%) in upper limbs and leg (27.8%) in lower limbs. Prevalence<br />of true positive and false negative cases for fractures detected by ultrasonography were 59 (64.8%) and 32<br />(35.52%) for upper and 49 (73.1%) and 18 (26.9%) for lower extremities, respectively. In addition, prevalence of<br />true positive and false negative detected cases for intra-articular fractures were 24 (48%) and 26 (52%), respectively.<br />Conclusion: The present study shows the moderate sensitivity (68.3%) of ultrasonography in detection<br />of different extremity bone fractures. Ultrasonography showed the best sensitivity in detection of femur (100%)<br />and humerus (76.2%) fractures, respectively. It had low sensitivity in detection of in intra-articular fractures.http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/emergency/article/view/12821Ultrasonographyradiographyfractures, bonediagnosisemergency service, hospital
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Farzad Bozorgi
Massoud Shayesteh Azar
Seyed Hossein Montazer
Aroona Chabra
Seyed Farshad Heidari
Alireza Khalilian
spellingShingle Farzad Bozorgi
Massoud Shayesteh Azar
Seyed Hossein Montazer
Aroona Chabra
Seyed Farshad Heidari
Alireza Khalilian
Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study
Emergency
Ultrasonography
radiography
fractures, bone
diagnosis
emergency service, hospital
author_facet Farzad Bozorgi
Massoud Shayesteh Azar
Seyed Hossein Montazer
Aroona Chabra
Seyed Farshad Heidari
Alireza Khalilian
author_sort Farzad Bozorgi
title Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study
title_short Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study
title_full Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study
title_fullStr Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study
title_full_unstemmed Ability of Ultrasonography in Detection of Different Extremity Bone Fractures; a Case Series Study
title_sort ability of ultrasonography in detection of different extremity bone fractures; a case series study
publisher Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
series Emergency
issn 2345-4563
2345-4571
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Introduction: Despite radiography being the gold standard in evaluation of orthopedic injuries, using bedside<br />ultrasonography has several potential supremacies such as avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation, availability<br />in pre-hospital settings, being extensively accessible, and ability to be used on the bedside. The aim of the<br />present study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in detection of extremity bone fractures.<br />Methods: This study is a case series study, which was prospectively conducted on multiple blunt trauma patients,<br />who were 18 years old or older, had stable hemodynamic, Glasgow coma scale 15, and signs or symptoms<br />of a possible extremity bone fracture. After initial assessment, ultrasonography of suspected bones was performed<br />by a trained emergency medicine resident and prevalence of true positive and false negative findings<br />were calculated compared to plain radiology. Results: 108 patients with the mean age of 44.6 § 20.4 years were<br />studied (67.6% male). Analysis was done on 158 sites of fracture, which were confirmed with plain radiography.<br />91 (57.6%) cases were suspected to have upper extremity fracture(s) and 67 (42.4%) to have lower ones.<br />The most frequent site of injuries were forearm (36.7%) in upper limbs and leg (27.8%) in lower limbs. Prevalence<br />of true positive and false negative cases for fractures detected by ultrasonography were 59 (64.8%) and 32<br />(35.52%) for upper and 49 (73.1%) and 18 (26.9%) for lower extremities, respectively. In addition, prevalence of<br />true positive and false negative detected cases for intra-articular fractures were 24 (48%) and 26 (52%), respectively.<br />Conclusion: The present study shows the moderate sensitivity (68.3%) of ultrasonography in detection<br />of different extremity bone fractures. Ultrasonography showed the best sensitivity in detection of femur (100%)<br />and humerus (76.2%) fractures, respectively. It had low sensitivity in detection of in intra-articular fractures.
topic Ultrasonography
radiography
fractures, bone
diagnosis
emergency service, hospital
url http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/emergency/article/view/12821
work_keys_str_mv AT farzadbozorgi abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy
AT massoudshayestehazar abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy
AT seyedhosseinmontazer abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy
AT aroonachabra abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy
AT seyedfarshadheidari abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy
AT alirezakhalilian abilityofultrasonographyindetectionofdifferentextremitybonefracturesacaseseriesstudy
_version_ 1724677910392995840