The Performance of Five Willow Cultivars under Different Pedoclimatic Conditions and Rotation Cycles

A plant’s genotype, their environment, and the interaction between them influence its growth and development. In this study, we investigated the effect of these factors on the growth and biomass yield of willows in short-rotation coppice (SRC) under different harvesting cycles (i.e., two-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Werther Guidi Nissim, Benoit Lafleur, Michel Labrecque
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-06-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
SRC
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/6/349
id doaj-5bdf0e37092943cb8e5a9a995e37f730
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5bdf0e37092943cb8e5a9a995e37f7302020-11-24T20:48:12ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072018-06-019634910.3390/f9060349f9060349The Performance of Five Willow Cultivars under Different Pedoclimatic Conditions and Rotation CyclesWerther Guidi Nissim0Benoit Lafleur1Michel Labrecque2Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale, Université de Montréal and Montreal Botanical Garden, Montréal, QC H1X 2B2, CanadaInstitut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale, Université de Montréal and Montreal Botanical Garden, Montréal, QC H1X 2B2, CanadaInstitut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale, Université de Montréal and Montreal Botanical Garden, Montréal, QC H1X 2B2, CanadaA plant’s genotype, their environment, and the interaction between them influence its growth and development. In this study, we investigated the effect of these factors on the growth and biomass yield of willows in short-rotation coppice (SRC) under different harvesting cycles (i.e., two- vs. three-year rotations) in Quebec (Canada). Five of the commercial willow cultivars most common in Quebec, (i.e., Salix × dasyclados Wimm. ‘SV1’, Salix viminalis L. ‘5027’, Salix miyabeana Seeman ‘SX61’, ‘SX64’ and ‘SX67’) were grown in five sites with different pedoclimatic conditions. Yield not only varied significantly according to site and cultivar, but a significant interaction between rotation and site was also detected. Cultivar ‘5027’ showed significantly lower annual biomass yield in both two-year (average 10.8 t ha−1 year−1) and three-year rotation (average 11.2 t ha−1 year−1) compared to other cultivars (15.2 t ha−1 year−1 and 14.6 t ha−1 year−1 in two- and three-year rotation, respectively). Biomass yield also varied significantly with rotation cycle, but the extent of the response depended upon the site. While in some sites the average productivity of all cultivars remained fairly constant under different rotations (i.e., 17.4 vs. 16 t ha−1 year−1 in two- and three-year rotation, respectively), in other cases, biomass yield was higher in the two- than in the three-year rotation or vice versa. Evidence suggests that soil physico-chemical properties are better predictors of willow SRC plantation performance than climate variables.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/6/349SalixSRCbiomasswillow cultivarsenvironmental conditions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Werther Guidi Nissim
Benoit Lafleur
Michel Labrecque
spellingShingle Werther Guidi Nissim
Benoit Lafleur
Michel Labrecque
The Performance of Five Willow Cultivars under Different Pedoclimatic Conditions and Rotation Cycles
Forests
Salix
SRC
biomass
willow cultivars
environmental conditions
author_facet Werther Guidi Nissim
Benoit Lafleur
Michel Labrecque
author_sort Werther Guidi Nissim
title The Performance of Five Willow Cultivars under Different Pedoclimatic Conditions and Rotation Cycles
title_short The Performance of Five Willow Cultivars under Different Pedoclimatic Conditions and Rotation Cycles
title_full The Performance of Five Willow Cultivars under Different Pedoclimatic Conditions and Rotation Cycles
title_fullStr The Performance of Five Willow Cultivars under Different Pedoclimatic Conditions and Rotation Cycles
title_full_unstemmed The Performance of Five Willow Cultivars under Different Pedoclimatic Conditions and Rotation Cycles
title_sort performance of five willow cultivars under different pedoclimatic conditions and rotation cycles
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2018-06-01
description A plant’s genotype, their environment, and the interaction between them influence its growth and development. In this study, we investigated the effect of these factors on the growth and biomass yield of willows in short-rotation coppice (SRC) under different harvesting cycles (i.e., two- vs. three-year rotations) in Quebec (Canada). Five of the commercial willow cultivars most common in Quebec, (i.e., Salix × dasyclados Wimm. ‘SV1’, Salix viminalis L. ‘5027’, Salix miyabeana Seeman ‘SX61’, ‘SX64’ and ‘SX67’) were grown in five sites with different pedoclimatic conditions. Yield not only varied significantly according to site and cultivar, but a significant interaction between rotation and site was also detected. Cultivar ‘5027’ showed significantly lower annual biomass yield in both two-year (average 10.8 t ha−1 year−1) and three-year rotation (average 11.2 t ha−1 year−1) compared to other cultivars (15.2 t ha−1 year−1 and 14.6 t ha−1 year−1 in two- and three-year rotation, respectively). Biomass yield also varied significantly with rotation cycle, but the extent of the response depended upon the site. While in some sites the average productivity of all cultivars remained fairly constant under different rotations (i.e., 17.4 vs. 16 t ha−1 year−1 in two- and three-year rotation, respectively), in other cases, biomass yield was higher in the two- than in the three-year rotation or vice versa. Evidence suggests that soil physico-chemical properties are better predictors of willow SRC plantation performance than climate variables.
topic Salix
SRC
biomass
willow cultivars
environmental conditions
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/6/349
work_keys_str_mv AT wertherguidinissim theperformanceoffivewillowcultivarsunderdifferentpedoclimaticconditionsandrotationcycles
AT benoitlafleur theperformanceoffivewillowcultivarsunderdifferentpedoclimaticconditionsandrotationcycles
AT michellabrecque theperformanceoffivewillowcultivarsunderdifferentpedoclimaticconditionsandrotationcycles
AT wertherguidinissim performanceoffivewillowcultivarsunderdifferentpedoclimaticconditionsandrotationcycles
AT benoitlafleur performanceoffivewillowcultivarsunderdifferentpedoclimaticconditionsandrotationcycles
AT michellabrecque performanceoffivewillowcultivarsunderdifferentpedoclimaticconditionsandrotationcycles
_version_ 1716808657279123456