Prediction, time variance, and classification of hydraulic response to recharge in two karst aquifers

Many karst aquifers are rapidly filled and depleted and therefore are likely to be susceptible to changes in short-term climate variability. Here we explore methods that could be applied to model site-specific hydraulic responses, with the intent of simulating these responses to different climate sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. J. Long, B. J. Mahler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/281/2013/hess-17-281-2013.pdf
id doaj-5c2fcea7af034b1c87fe35bbf0ddb25f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c2fcea7af034b1c87fe35bbf0ddb25f2020-11-25T00:17:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382013-01-0117128129410.5194/hess-17-281-2013Prediction, time variance, and classification of hydraulic response to recharge in two karst aquifersA. J. LongB. J. MahlerMany karst aquifers are rapidly filled and depleted and therefore are likely to be susceptible to changes in short-term climate variability. Here we explore methods that could be applied to model site-specific hydraulic responses, with the intent of simulating these responses to different climate scenarios from high-resolution climate models. We compare hydraulic responses (spring flow, groundwater level, stream base flow, and cave drip) at several sites in two karst aquifers: the Edwards aquifer (Texas, USA) and the Madison aquifer (South Dakota, USA). A lumped-parameter model simulates nonlinear soil moisture changes for estimation of recharge, and a time-variant convolution model simulates the aquifer response to this recharge. Model fit to data is 2.4% better for calibration periods than for validation periods according to the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency, which ranges from 0.53 to 0.94 for validation periods. We use metrics that describe the shapes of the impulse-response functions (IRFs) obtained from convolution modeling to make comparisons in the distribution of response times among sites and between aquifers. Time-variant IRFs were applied to 62% of the sites. Principal component analysis (PCA) of metrics describing the shapes of the IRFs indicates three principal components that together account for 84% of the variability in IRF shape: the first is related to IRF skewness and temporal spread and accounts for 51% of the variability; the second and third largely are related to time-variant properties and together account for 33% of the variability. Sites with IRFs that dominantly comprise exponential curves are separated geographically from those dominantly comprising lognormal curves in both aquifers as a result of spatial heterogeneity. The use of multiple IRF metrics in PCA is a novel method to characterize, compare, and classify the way in which different sites and aquifers respond to recharge. As convolution models are developed for additional aquifers, they could contribute to an IRF database and a general classification system for karst aquifers.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/281/2013/hess-17-281-2013.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. J. Long
B. J. Mahler
spellingShingle A. J. Long
B. J. Mahler
Prediction, time variance, and classification of hydraulic response to recharge in two karst aquifers
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet A. J. Long
B. J. Mahler
author_sort A. J. Long
title Prediction, time variance, and classification of hydraulic response to recharge in two karst aquifers
title_short Prediction, time variance, and classification of hydraulic response to recharge in two karst aquifers
title_full Prediction, time variance, and classification of hydraulic response to recharge in two karst aquifers
title_fullStr Prediction, time variance, and classification of hydraulic response to recharge in two karst aquifers
title_full_unstemmed Prediction, time variance, and classification of hydraulic response to recharge in two karst aquifers
title_sort prediction, time variance, and classification of hydraulic response to recharge in two karst aquifers
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Many karst aquifers are rapidly filled and depleted and therefore are likely to be susceptible to changes in short-term climate variability. Here we explore methods that could be applied to model site-specific hydraulic responses, with the intent of simulating these responses to different climate scenarios from high-resolution climate models. We compare hydraulic responses (spring flow, groundwater level, stream base flow, and cave drip) at several sites in two karst aquifers: the Edwards aquifer (Texas, USA) and the Madison aquifer (South Dakota, USA). A lumped-parameter model simulates nonlinear soil moisture changes for estimation of recharge, and a time-variant convolution model simulates the aquifer response to this recharge. Model fit to data is 2.4% better for calibration periods than for validation periods according to the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency, which ranges from 0.53 to 0.94 for validation periods. We use metrics that describe the shapes of the impulse-response functions (IRFs) obtained from convolution modeling to make comparisons in the distribution of response times among sites and between aquifers. Time-variant IRFs were applied to 62% of the sites. Principal component analysis (PCA) of metrics describing the shapes of the IRFs indicates three principal components that together account for 84% of the variability in IRF shape: the first is related to IRF skewness and temporal spread and accounts for 51% of the variability; the second and third largely are related to time-variant properties and together account for 33% of the variability. Sites with IRFs that dominantly comprise exponential curves are separated geographically from those dominantly comprising lognormal curves in both aquifers as a result of spatial heterogeneity. The use of multiple IRF metrics in PCA is a novel method to characterize, compare, and classify the way in which different sites and aquifers respond to recharge. As convolution models are developed for additional aquifers, they could contribute to an IRF database and a general classification system for karst aquifers.
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/281/2013/hess-17-281-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ajlong predictiontimevarianceandclassificationofhydraulicresponsetorechargeintwokarstaquifers
AT bjmahler predictiontimevarianceandclassificationofhydraulicresponsetorechargeintwokarstaquifers
_version_ 1725380884260978688