Design and standardization of tools for assessing the perceived heart risk and heart health literacy in Iran

• Main Authors: Habibolah Khazaei, Saeid Komasi, Ali Zakiei, Mohsen Rezaei, Peyman Hatamian, Mohammad Jashnpoor, Mozhgan Saeidi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
• Series: Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
• Subjects: Cardiovascular diseases; health literacy; perceived risk; reliability; validity
• Online Access: http://www.annals.in/article.asp?issn=0971-9784;year=2018;volume=21;issue=1;spage=46;epage=52;aulast=Khazaei

Objectives: The aim is to achieve the standard tools for heart health, the present study aimed to design, develop, and standardize the two questionnaires of perceived heart risk scale (PHRS) and heart health literacy scale (HHLS). Methods: The present study was a methodological research conducted on the residents of Kermanshah Province, Iran, using the multi-stage cluster sampling. Further, considering the scientific methods in the psychometric field, the design of the research questionnaires was conducted. In addition, the viewpoints of experts in different domains were qualitatively and quantitatively included to assess the validity of the questionnaires. To assess the reliability of the questionnaires, a sample including 31 subjects was first selected and studied within a fortnight's interval. Then, the reliability and validity of the scales were assessed using factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha in a sample of 771 subjects. Results: After reviewing the viewpoints of experts, the items were adjusted and implemented in the first sample at two stages. The results were indicative of the stability and acceptability of the Cronbach's alpha. In addition, the validity and reliability of the questionnaires were confirmed in the second sample too. Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, it can be concluded that the two questionnaires of PHRS and HHLS had acceptable reliability and validity.