Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.

We investigated the effects of implicit local contextual processing using behavioral and electrophysiological measures. EEG recording blocks consisted of targets preceded by either randomized sequences of standards or by sequences including a predictive sequence signaling the occurrence of a target...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noa Fogelson, Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3681826?pdf=render
id doaj-5c5400f9deba41a691d98b6854ba3062
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c5400f9deba41a691d98b6854ba30622020-11-25T01:15:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0186e6591410.1371/journal.pone.0065914Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.Noa FogelsonMiguel Fernandez-Del-OlmoWe investigated the effects of implicit local contextual processing using behavioral and electrophysiological measures. EEG recording blocks consisted of targets preceded by either randomized sequences of standards or by sequences including a predictive sequence signaling the occurrence of a target event. Subjects performed two sessions: in the first the regularity of the predictive sequence was implicit, while in the second this regularity was made explicit. Subjects pressed a button in response to targets. Both the implicit and explicit sessions showed shorter reaction times and peak P3b latencies for predicted versus random targets, although to a greater extent in the explicit session. In both sessions the middle and last most-informative stimuli of the three-standard predictive sequence induced a significant larger P3b compared with randomized standards. The findings show that local contextual information is processed implicitly, but that this modulation was significantly greater when subjects were explicitly instructed to attend to target-predictive contextual information. The findings suggest that top-down attentional networks have a role in modulating the extent to which contextual information is utilized.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3681826?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Noa Fogelson
Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo
spellingShingle Noa Fogelson
Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo
Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Noa Fogelson
Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo
author_sort Noa Fogelson
title Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.
title_short Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.
title_full Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.
title_fullStr Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.
title_full_unstemmed Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.
title_sort implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description We investigated the effects of implicit local contextual processing using behavioral and electrophysiological measures. EEG recording blocks consisted of targets preceded by either randomized sequences of standards or by sequences including a predictive sequence signaling the occurrence of a target event. Subjects performed two sessions: in the first the regularity of the predictive sequence was implicit, while in the second this regularity was made explicit. Subjects pressed a button in response to targets. Both the implicit and explicit sessions showed shorter reaction times and peak P3b latencies for predicted versus random targets, although to a greater extent in the explicit session. In both sessions the middle and last most-informative stimuli of the three-standard predictive sequence induced a significant larger P3b compared with randomized standards. The findings show that local contextual information is processed implicitly, but that this modulation was significantly greater when subjects were explicitly instructed to attend to target-predictive contextual information. The findings suggest that top-down attentional networks have a role in modulating the extent to which contextual information is utilized.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3681826?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT noafogelson implicitversusexplicitlocalcontextualprocessing
AT miguelfernandezdelolmo implicitversusexplicitlocalcontextualprocessing
_version_ 1725153180331802624