Means of interpretation of international treaties and determinants of their significance

The choice of means of interpretation and attribution appropriate weight to them may well determine the outcome of an interpretation. Articles 31 of the 32 of the VCLT leave broad discretion to an interpreter in that respect. That may turn an interpretation into a legal process of diminishing predic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Etinski Rodoljub M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law 2017-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2017/0550-21791704177E.pdf
id doaj-5ca2768cbf09460ab7365f5ebd15c759
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ca2768cbf09460ab7365f5ebd15c7592020-11-25T00:17:35ZengUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of LawZbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu0550-21792406-12552017-01-01514117712060550-21791704177EMeans of interpretation of international treaties and determinants of their significanceEtinski Rodoljub M.0University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, Novi SadThe choice of means of interpretation and attribution appropriate weight to them may well determine the outcome of an interpretation. Articles 31 of the 32 of the VCLT leave broad discretion to an interpreter in that respect. That may turn an interpretation into a legal process of diminishing predictability and undermine legal certainty. Judicious discretion in the choice and weighing means of interpretation should not be unlimited. The nature and particular characteristics of a treaty, of a question that should be answered by interpretation, and of the means of interpretation, might have the role of determinants of the significance of means of interpretation. The correlations in a triangle of the particular characteristics of the treaty, the question and the means of interpretation, established as typical in the practice of international courts, might constitute a standard model of interpretation. An international court would be expected to explain its departure from the model.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2017/0550-21791704177E.pdfinternational treatiesmeans of interpretationsignificance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Etinski Rodoljub M.
spellingShingle Etinski Rodoljub M.
Means of interpretation of international treaties and determinants of their significance
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
international treaties
means of interpretation
significance
author_facet Etinski Rodoljub M.
author_sort Etinski Rodoljub M.
title Means of interpretation of international treaties and determinants of their significance
title_short Means of interpretation of international treaties and determinants of their significance
title_full Means of interpretation of international treaties and determinants of their significance
title_fullStr Means of interpretation of international treaties and determinants of their significance
title_full_unstemmed Means of interpretation of international treaties and determinants of their significance
title_sort means of interpretation of international treaties and determinants of their significance
publisher University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
series Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
issn 0550-2179
2406-1255
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The choice of means of interpretation and attribution appropriate weight to them may well determine the outcome of an interpretation. Articles 31 of the 32 of the VCLT leave broad discretion to an interpreter in that respect. That may turn an interpretation into a legal process of diminishing predictability and undermine legal certainty. Judicious discretion in the choice and weighing means of interpretation should not be unlimited. The nature and particular characteristics of a treaty, of a question that should be answered by interpretation, and of the means of interpretation, might have the role of determinants of the significance of means of interpretation. The correlations in a triangle of the particular characteristics of the treaty, the question and the means of interpretation, established as typical in the practice of international courts, might constitute a standard model of interpretation. An international court would be expected to explain its departure from the model.
topic international treaties
means of interpretation
significance
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2017/0550-21791704177E.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT etinskirodoljubm meansofinterpretationofinternationaltreatiesanddeterminantsoftheirsignificance
_version_ 1725379107074605056