Duration of protective immunity and antibody responses in cattle immunised against alcelaphine herpesvirus-1-induced malignant catarrhal fever

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Protection of cattle from alcelaphine herpesvirus-1 (AlHV-1)-induced malignant catarrhal fever (MCF) has been described previously, using an attenuated virus vaccine in an unlicensed adjuvant. The vaccine was hypothesised to induce a protective barrier of virus-n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Russell George C, Benavides Julio, Grant Dawn, Todd Helen, Deane David, Percival Ann, Thomson Jackie, Connelly Maira, Haig David M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-06-01
Series:Veterinary Research
Online Access:http://www.veterinaryresearch.org/content/43/1/51
id doaj-5cc07b87c346420db399c9c765e7f0c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5cc07b87c346420db399c9c765e7f0c82020-11-24T20:59:13ZengBMCVeterinary Research0928-42491297-97162012-06-014315110.1186/1297-9716-43-51Duration of protective immunity and antibody responses in cattle immunised against alcelaphine herpesvirus-1-induced malignant catarrhal feverRussell George CBenavides JulioGrant DawnTodd HelenDeane DavidPercival AnnThomson JackieConnelly MairaHaig David M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Protection of cattle from alcelaphine herpesvirus-1 (AlHV-1)-induced malignant catarrhal fever (MCF) has been described previously, using an attenuated virus vaccine in an unlicensed adjuvant. The vaccine was hypothesised to induce a protective barrier of virus-neutralising antibody in the oro-nasal region, supported by the observation of high titre neutralising antibodies in nasal secretions of protected animals. Here we describe further analysis of this vaccine strategy, studying the effectiveness of the vaccine formulated with a licensed adjuvant; the duration of immunity induced; and the virus-specific antibody responses in plasma and nasal secretions. The results presented here show that the attenuated AlHV-1 vaccine in a licensed adjuvant protected cattle from fatal intranasal challenge with pathogenic AlHV-1 at three or six months. In addition, animals protected from MCF had significantly higher initial anti-viral antibody titres than animals that succumbed to disease; and these antibody titres remained relatively stable after challenge, while titres in vaccinated animals with MCF increased significantly prior to the onset of clinical disease. These data support the view that a mucosal barrier of neutralising antibody blocks infection of vaccinated animals and suggests that the magnitude of the initial response may correlate with long-term protection. Interestingly, the high titre virus-neutralising antibody responses seen in animals that succumbed to MCF after vaccination were not protective.</p> http://www.veterinaryresearch.org/content/43/1/51
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Russell George C
Benavides Julio
Grant Dawn
Todd Helen
Deane David
Percival Ann
Thomson Jackie
Connelly Maira
Haig David M
spellingShingle Russell George C
Benavides Julio
Grant Dawn
Todd Helen
Deane David
Percival Ann
Thomson Jackie
Connelly Maira
Haig David M
Duration of protective immunity and antibody responses in cattle immunised against alcelaphine herpesvirus-1-induced malignant catarrhal fever
Veterinary Research
author_facet Russell George C
Benavides Julio
Grant Dawn
Todd Helen
Deane David
Percival Ann
Thomson Jackie
Connelly Maira
Haig David M
author_sort Russell George C
title Duration of protective immunity and antibody responses in cattle immunised against alcelaphine herpesvirus-1-induced malignant catarrhal fever
title_short Duration of protective immunity and antibody responses in cattle immunised against alcelaphine herpesvirus-1-induced malignant catarrhal fever
title_full Duration of protective immunity and antibody responses in cattle immunised against alcelaphine herpesvirus-1-induced malignant catarrhal fever
title_fullStr Duration of protective immunity and antibody responses in cattle immunised against alcelaphine herpesvirus-1-induced malignant catarrhal fever
title_full_unstemmed Duration of protective immunity and antibody responses in cattle immunised against alcelaphine herpesvirus-1-induced malignant catarrhal fever
title_sort duration of protective immunity and antibody responses in cattle immunised against alcelaphine herpesvirus-1-induced malignant catarrhal fever
publisher BMC
series Veterinary Research
issn 0928-4249
1297-9716
publishDate 2012-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Protection of cattle from alcelaphine herpesvirus-1 (AlHV-1)-induced malignant catarrhal fever (MCF) has been described previously, using an attenuated virus vaccine in an unlicensed adjuvant. The vaccine was hypothesised to induce a protective barrier of virus-neutralising antibody in the oro-nasal region, supported by the observation of high titre neutralising antibodies in nasal secretions of protected animals. Here we describe further analysis of this vaccine strategy, studying the effectiveness of the vaccine formulated with a licensed adjuvant; the duration of immunity induced; and the virus-specific antibody responses in plasma and nasal secretions. The results presented here show that the attenuated AlHV-1 vaccine in a licensed adjuvant protected cattle from fatal intranasal challenge with pathogenic AlHV-1 at three or six months. In addition, animals protected from MCF had significantly higher initial anti-viral antibody titres than animals that succumbed to disease; and these antibody titres remained relatively stable after challenge, while titres in vaccinated animals with MCF increased significantly prior to the onset of clinical disease. These data support the view that a mucosal barrier of neutralising antibody blocks infection of vaccinated animals and suggests that the magnitude of the initial response may correlate with long-term protection. Interestingly, the high titre virus-neutralising antibody responses seen in animals that succumbed to MCF after vaccination were not protective.</p>
url http://www.veterinaryresearch.org/content/43/1/51
work_keys_str_mv AT russellgeorgec durationofprotectiveimmunityandantibodyresponsesincattleimmunisedagainstalcelaphineherpesvirus1inducedmalignantcatarrhalfever
AT benavidesjulio durationofprotectiveimmunityandantibodyresponsesincattleimmunisedagainstalcelaphineherpesvirus1inducedmalignantcatarrhalfever
AT grantdawn durationofprotectiveimmunityandantibodyresponsesincattleimmunisedagainstalcelaphineherpesvirus1inducedmalignantcatarrhalfever
AT toddhelen durationofprotectiveimmunityandantibodyresponsesincattleimmunisedagainstalcelaphineherpesvirus1inducedmalignantcatarrhalfever
AT deanedavid durationofprotectiveimmunityandantibodyresponsesincattleimmunisedagainstalcelaphineherpesvirus1inducedmalignantcatarrhalfever
AT percivalann durationofprotectiveimmunityandantibodyresponsesincattleimmunisedagainstalcelaphineherpesvirus1inducedmalignantcatarrhalfever
AT thomsonjackie durationofprotectiveimmunityandantibodyresponsesincattleimmunisedagainstalcelaphineherpesvirus1inducedmalignantcatarrhalfever
AT connellymaira durationofprotectiveimmunityandantibodyresponsesincattleimmunisedagainstalcelaphineherpesvirus1inducedmalignantcatarrhalfever
AT haigdavidm durationofprotectiveimmunityandantibodyresponsesincattleimmunisedagainstalcelaphineherpesvirus1inducedmalignantcatarrhalfever
_version_ 1716783245161398272