Different interfacial structures of Cu/In obtained by surface activated bonding (SAB) in vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet (V-VUV) at atmospheric pressure
A difference in interfacial structure derived from a difference in binding mechanisms, was assessed to obtain a robust Cu/In interface with low-temperature fluxless solder bonding. As examples of typical bonding methods, Ar fast atom beam (Ar-FAB) surface activation in high vacuum and vapor-assisted...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Materials & Design |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127520306006 |
id |
doaj-5cccb7df2fb94b5c8a9f2a9306abeeb2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5cccb7df2fb94b5c8a9f2a9306abeeb22020-11-25T02:46:18ZengElsevierMaterials & Design0264-12752020-10-01195109065Different interfacial structures of Cu/In obtained by surface activated bonding (SAB) in vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet (V-VUV) at atmospheric pressureY.S. Chiu0C.R. Kao1A. Shigetou2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan; National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan; Corresponding author at: Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, TaiwanNational Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, JapanA difference in interfacial structure derived from a difference in binding mechanisms, was assessed to obtain a robust Cu/In interface with low-temperature fluxless solder bonding. As examples of typical bonding methods, Ar fast atom beam (Ar-FAB) surface activation in high vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet irradiation (V-VUV) method were adopted for Cu and In. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results show that atomically clean surfaces were created at room temperature in high vacuum using the Ar-FAB method, whereas ultrathin metal hydrate bridge layers were created in ambient in V-VUV method. Both methods created tight voidless bond interfaces: at room temperature in Ar-FAB and at 50 °C in V-VUV. However, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations revealed an oxide-based 5-nm-thick interfacial layer obtained via the V-VUV method, which was attributable to dehydration of the hydrate bridge layer. Moreover, this interfacial layer was regarded as effective to recess the heavy interfacial reaction between Cu and In, causing formation of less Cu-consuming inter-metallic compound (IMC).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127520306006BondingLow temperature solderSurface analysis3D packaging |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Y.S. Chiu C.R. Kao A. Shigetou |
spellingShingle |
Y.S. Chiu C.R. Kao A. Shigetou Different interfacial structures of Cu/In obtained by surface activated bonding (SAB) in vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet (V-VUV) at atmospheric pressure Materials & Design Bonding Low temperature solder Surface analysis 3D packaging |
author_facet |
Y.S. Chiu C.R. Kao A. Shigetou |
author_sort |
Y.S. Chiu |
title |
Different interfacial structures of Cu/In obtained by surface activated bonding (SAB) in vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet (V-VUV) at atmospheric pressure |
title_short |
Different interfacial structures of Cu/In obtained by surface activated bonding (SAB) in vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet (V-VUV) at atmospheric pressure |
title_full |
Different interfacial structures of Cu/In obtained by surface activated bonding (SAB) in vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet (V-VUV) at atmospheric pressure |
title_fullStr |
Different interfacial structures of Cu/In obtained by surface activated bonding (SAB) in vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet (V-VUV) at atmospheric pressure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different interfacial structures of Cu/In obtained by surface activated bonding (SAB) in vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet (V-VUV) at atmospheric pressure |
title_sort |
different interfacial structures of cu/in obtained by surface activated bonding (sab) in vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet (v-vuv) at atmospheric pressure |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Materials & Design |
issn |
0264-1275 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
A difference in interfacial structure derived from a difference in binding mechanisms, was assessed to obtain a robust Cu/In interface with low-temperature fluxless solder bonding. As examples of typical bonding methods, Ar fast atom beam (Ar-FAB) surface activation in high vacuum and vapor-assisted vacuum ultraviolet irradiation (V-VUV) method were adopted for Cu and In. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results show that atomically clean surfaces were created at room temperature in high vacuum using the Ar-FAB method, whereas ultrathin metal hydrate bridge layers were created in ambient in V-VUV method. Both methods created tight voidless bond interfaces: at room temperature in Ar-FAB and at 50 °C in V-VUV. However, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations revealed an oxide-based 5-nm-thick interfacial layer obtained via the V-VUV method, which was attributable to dehydration of the hydrate bridge layer. Moreover, this interfacial layer was regarded as effective to recess the heavy interfacial reaction between Cu and In, causing formation of less Cu-consuming inter-metallic compound (IMC). |
topic |
Bonding Low temperature solder Surface analysis 3D packaging |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127520306006 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yschiu differentinterfacialstructuresofcuinobtainedbysurfaceactivatedbondingsabinvacuumandvaporassistedvacuumultravioletvvuvatatmosphericpressure AT crkao differentinterfacialstructuresofcuinobtainedbysurfaceactivatedbondingsabinvacuumandvaporassistedvacuumultravioletvvuvatatmosphericpressure AT ashigetou differentinterfacialstructuresofcuinobtainedbysurfaceactivatedbondingsabinvacuumandvaporassistedvacuumultravioletvvuvatatmosphericpressure |
_version_ |
1724759313819369472 |