Food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concern

Numerous studies have examined the effects of the provision of supplementary food on aspects of avian reproductive success, but far fewer have gone on to examine the potential positive effects of food supplementation on the demographic rates which are key for population growth rate. Testing for pote...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Innes M.W. Sim, Nicholas I. Wilkinson, Davide Scridel, David Anderson, Staffan Roos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2015-05-01
Series:Nature Conservation
Online Access:http://natureconservation.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=4556
id doaj-5cfba23d2be14e439017dee806bffbe5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5cfba23d2be14e439017dee806bffbe52020-11-24T20:48:23ZengPensoft PublishersNature Conservation1314-69471314-33012015-05-0110254310.3897/natureconservation.10.45564556Food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concernInnes M.W. SimNicholas I. WilkinsonDavide ScridelDavid AndersonStaffan RoosNumerous studies have examined the effects of the provision of supplementary food on aspects of avian reproductive success, but far fewer have gone on to examine the potential positive effects of food supplementation on the demographic rates which are key for population growth rate. Testing for potential effects of food shortage on vital rates is likely to be particularly important in species of high conservation concern, where populations are particularly small, isolated or decreasing rapidly. Here we test the effects of the provision of supplementary food on reproductive success, body condition at fledging and post-fledging survival of ring ouzels (Turdus torquatus), a species of high conservation concern in the UK. However, food supplementation had no detectable effect on any of these parameters. There was no significant difference in return rates of fed and unfed fledglings in the year following hatching, and most post-fledging mortality was apparently caused by predation by raptors and mustelids. We conclude that the supply of invertebrate food sources for nestlings was not a major limiting factor in our study area, at least during this two-year study. Further studies are required to quantify the precise mix of habitats used by ring ouzels, at the appropriate scale, which provide concealment from predators and access to food supplies throughout the spring and summer months.http://natureconservation.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=4556
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Innes M.W. Sim
Nicholas I. Wilkinson
Davide Scridel
David Anderson
Staffan Roos
spellingShingle Innes M.W. Sim
Nicholas I. Wilkinson
Davide Scridel
David Anderson
Staffan Roos
Food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concern
Nature Conservation
author_facet Innes M.W. Sim
Nicholas I. Wilkinson
Davide Scridel
David Anderson
Staffan Roos
author_sort Innes M.W. Sim
title Food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concern
title_short Food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concern
title_full Food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concern
title_fullStr Food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concern
title_full_unstemmed Food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concern
title_sort food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concern
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series Nature Conservation
issn 1314-6947
1314-3301
publishDate 2015-05-01
description Numerous studies have examined the effects of the provision of supplementary food on aspects of avian reproductive success, but far fewer have gone on to examine the potential positive effects of food supplementation on the demographic rates which are key for population growth rate. Testing for potential effects of food shortage on vital rates is likely to be particularly important in species of high conservation concern, where populations are particularly small, isolated or decreasing rapidly. Here we test the effects of the provision of supplementary food on reproductive success, body condition at fledging and post-fledging survival of ring ouzels (Turdus torquatus), a species of high conservation concern in the UK. However, food supplementation had no detectable effect on any of these parameters. There was no significant difference in return rates of fed and unfed fledglings in the year following hatching, and most post-fledging mortality was apparently caused by predation by raptors and mustelids. We conclude that the supply of invertebrate food sources for nestlings was not a major limiting factor in our study area, at least during this two-year study. Further studies are required to quantify the precise mix of habitats used by ring ouzels, at the appropriate scale, which provide concealment from predators and access to food supplies throughout the spring and summer months.
url http://natureconservation.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=4556
work_keys_str_mv AT innesmwsim foodsupplementationdoesnotincreasedemographicratesinapasserinespeciesofconservationconcern
AT nicholasiwilkinson foodsupplementationdoesnotincreasedemographicratesinapasserinespeciesofconservationconcern
AT davidescridel foodsupplementationdoesnotincreasedemographicratesinapasserinespeciesofconservationconcern
AT davidanderson foodsupplementationdoesnotincreasedemographicratesinapasserinespeciesofconservationconcern
AT staffanroos foodsupplementationdoesnotincreasedemographicratesinapasserinespeciesofconservationconcern
_version_ 1716807961425215488