Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents

To understand the functional meaning of morphological features, we need to relate what we know about morphology and ecology in a meaningful, quantitative framework. Closely related species usually share more phenotypic features than distant ones, but close relatives do not necessarily have the same...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luis D. Verde Arregoitia, Diana O. Fisher, Manuel Schweizer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2017-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160957
id doaj-5d01a9a9e32c46a58b0c3ba2d6e6a47c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d01a9a9e32c46a58b0c3ba2d6e6a47c2020-11-25T03:08:41ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032017-01-014110.1098/rsos.160957160957Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodentsLuis D. Verde ArregoitiaDiana O. FisherManuel SchweizerTo understand the functional meaning of morphological features, we need to relate what we know about morphology and ecology in a meaningful, quantitative framework. Closely related species usually share more phenotypic features than distant ones, but close relatives do not necessarily have the same ecologies. Rodents are the most diverse group of living mammals, with impressive ecomorphological diversification. We used museum collections and ecological literature to gather data on morphology, diet and locomotion for 208 species of rodents from different bioregions to investigate how morphological similarity and phylogenetic relatedness are associated with ecology. After considering differences in body size and shared evolutionary history, we find that unrelated species with similar ecologies can be characterized by a well-defined suite of morphological features. Our results validate the hypothesized ecological relevance of the chosen traits. These cranial, dental and external (e.g. ears) characters predicted diet and locomotion and showed consistent differences among species with different feeding and substrate use strategies. We conclude that when ecological characters do not show strong phylogenetic patterns, we cannot simply assume that close relatives are ecologically similar. Museum specimens are valuable records of species' phenotypes and with the characters proposed here, morphology can reflect functional similarity, an important component of community ecology and macroevolution.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160957discriminant analysisecomorphologynon-metric multi-dimensional scalingphylomorphospacesize correction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luis D. Verde Arregoitia
Diana O. Fisher
Manuel Schweizer
spellingShingle Luis D. Verde Arregoitia
Diana O. Fisher
Manuel Schweizer
Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents
Royal Society Open Science
discriminant analysis
ecomorphology
non-metric multi-dimensional scaling
phylomorphospace
size correction
author_facet Luis D. Verde Arregoitia
Diana O. Fisher
Manuel Schweizer
author_sort Luis D. Verde Arregoitia
title Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents
title_short Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents
title_full Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents
title_fullStr Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents
title_full_unstemmed Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents
title_sort morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2017-01-01
description To understand the functional meaning of morphological features, we need to relate what we know about morphology and ecology in a meaningful, quantitative framework. Closely related species usually share more phenotypic features than distant ones, but close relatives do not necessarily have the same ecologies. Rodents are the most diverse group of living mammals, with impressive ecomorphological diversification. We used museum collections and ecological literature to gather data on morphology, diet and locomotion for 208 species of rodents from different bioregions to investigate how morphological similarity and phylogenetic relatedness are associated with ecology. After considering differences in body size and shared evolutionary history, we find that unrelated species with similar ecologies can be characterized by a well-defined suite of morphological features. Our results validate the hypothesized ecological relevance of the chosen traits. These cranial, dental and external (e.g. ears) characters predicted diet and locomotion and showed consistent differences among species with different feeding and substrate use strategies. We conclude that when ecological characters do not show strong phylogenetic patterns, we cannot simply assume that close relatives are ecologically similar. Museum specimens are valuable records of species' phenotypes and with the characters proposed here, morphology can reflect functional similarity, an important component of community ecology and macroevolution.
topic discriminant analysis
ecomorphology
non-metric multi-dimensional scaling
phylomorphospace
size correction
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160957
work_keys_str_mv AT luisdverdearregoitia morphologycapturesdietandlocomotortypesinrodents
AT dianaofisher morphologycapturesdietandlocomotortypesinrodents
AT manuelschweizer morphologycapturesdietandlocomotortypesinrodents
_version_ 1724664783217623040