Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents
To understand the functional meaning of morphological features, we need to relate what we know about morphology and ecology in a meaningful, quantitative framework. Closely related species usually share more phenotypic features than distant ones, but close relatives do not necessarily have the same...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160957 |
id |
doaj-5d01a9a9e32c46a58b0c3ba2d6e6a47c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5d01a9a9e32c46a58b0c3ba2d6e6a47c2020-11-25T03:08:41ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032017-01-014110.1098/rsos.160957160957Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodentsLuis D. Verde ArregoitiaDiana O. FisherManuel SchweizerTo understand the functional meaning of morphological features, we need to relate what we know about morphology and ecology in a meaningful, quantitative framework. Closely related species usually share more phenotypic features than distant ones, but close relatives do not necessarily have the same ecologies. Rodents are the most diverse group of living mammals, with impressive ecomorphological diversification. We used museum collections and ecological literature to gather data on morphology, diet and locomotion for 208 species of rodents from different bioregions to investigate how morphological similarity and phylogenetic relatedness are associated with ecology. After considering differences in body size and shared evolutionary history, we find that unrelated species with similar ecologies can be characterized by a well-defined suite of morphological features. Our results validate the hypothesized ecological relevance of the chosen traits. These cranial, dental and external (e.g. ears) characters predicted diet and locomotion and showed consistent differences among species with different feeding and substrate use strategies. We conclude that when ecological characters do not show strong phylogenetic patterns, we cannot simply assume that close relatives are ecologically similar. Museum specimens are valuable records of species' phenotypes and with the characters proposed here, morphology can reflect functional similarity, an important component of community ecology and macroevolution.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160957discriminant analysisecomorphologynon-metric multi-dimensional scalingphylomorphospacesize correction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Luis D. Verde Arregoitia Diana O. Fisher Manuel Schweizer |
spellingShingle |
Luis D. Verde Arregoitia Diana O. Fisher Manuel Schweizer Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents Royal Society Open Science discriminant analysis ecomorphology non-metric multi-dimensional scaling phylomorphospace size correction |
author_facet |
Luis D. Verde Arregoitia Diana O. Fisher Manuel Schweizer |
author_sort |
Luis D. Verde Arregoitia |
title |
Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents |
title_short |
Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents |
title_full |
Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents |
title_fullStr |
Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents |
title_full_unstemmed |
Morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents |
title_sort |
morphology captures diet and locomotor types in rodents |
publisher |
The Royal Society |
series |
Royal Society Open Science |
issn |
2054-5703 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
To understand the functional meaning of morphological features, we need to relate what we know about morphology and ecology in a meaningful, quantitative framework. Closely related species usually share more phenotypic features than distant ones, but close relatives do not necessarily have the same ecologies. Rodents are the most diverse group of living mammals, with impressive ecomorphological diversification. We used museum collections and ecological literature to gather data on morphology, diet and locomotion for 208 species of rodents from different bioregions to investigate how morphological similarity and phylogenetic relatedness are associated with ecology. After considering differences in body size and shared evolutionary history, we find that unrelated species with similar ecologies can be characterized by a well-defined suite of morphological features. Our results validate the hypothesized ecological relevance of the chosen traits. These cranial, dental and external (e.g. ears) characters predicted diet and locomotion and showed consistent differences among species with different feeding and substrate use strategies. We conclude that when ecological characters do not show strong phylogenetic patterns, we cannot simply assume that close relatives are ecologically similar. Museum specimens are valuable records of species' phenotypes and with the characters proposed here, morphology can reflect functional similarity, an important component of community ecology and macroevolution. |
topic |
discriminant analysis ecomorphology non-metric multi-dimensional scaling phylomorphospace size correction |
url |
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160957 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luisdverdearregoitia morphologycapturesdietandlocomotortypesinrodents AT dianaofisher morphologycapturesdietandlocomotortypesinrodents AT manuelschweizer morphologycapturesdietandlocomotortypesinrodents |
_version_ |
1724664783217623040 |