Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare PRO Tonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and non-contact tonometer in healthy and glaucomatous eyes

Abstract Purpose: To validate the comparative measurements of intraocular pressure performed with IcarePRO tonometer (IPT) in relation to Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and non-contact tonometer (NCT), as well as to evaluate the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on these values. M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatiana Sofia Monteiro Queirós, Márcia Clara Sá Rodrigues, Ana Carolina Pereira do Vale, Maria Josefina Costa Serino, Maria Teresa Leal Felgueiras Paínhas, Gabriel José Morgado Santos, Nuno Pedro Filipe da Costa e Lopes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
Series:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000500248&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-5da3dabcee014d16933f8d256f32a4f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5da3dabcee014d16933f8d256f32a4f82020-11-25T00:47:56ZengSociedade Brasileira de OftalmologiaRevista Brasileira de Oftalmologia1982-855177524825410.5935/0034-7280.20180054S0034-72802018000500248Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare PRO Tonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and non-contact tonometer in healthy and glaucomatous eyesTatiana Sofia Monteiro QueirósMárcia Clara Sá RodriguesAna Carolina Pereira do ValeMaria Josefina Costa SerinoMaria Teresa Leal Felgueiras PaínhasGabriel José Morgado SantosNuno Pedro Filipe da Costa e LopesAbstract Purpose: To validate the comparative measurements of intraocular pressure performed with IcarePRO tonometer (IPT) in relation to Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and non-contact tonometer (NCT), as well as to evaluate the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on these values. Methods: This was a prospective and comparative study conducted during 6 months in the Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Braga, Portugal. The study population comprised two groups: healthy adults and adults with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). The IOP values were obtained by the three tonometers and the order of execution was randomly selected. CCT values were obtained by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results: A total of 168 eyes (74 with diagnosis of POAG and 94 healthy) of 84 patients were included in this study. The mean IOP values obtained by IPT, GAT and NCT were 17.36±3.78 mmHg; 14.59±3.32 mmHg; and 17.04±4.01 mmHg, respectively. The comparison between IPT and NCT did not reveal statistically significant differences in the two groups studied. However, statistically significant differences were obtained between IPT and GAT values (p <0.001). The IOP values, recorded by all the tonometers, were significantly and positivily correlated with the CCT (p <0.001). Conclusion: IOP readings measured by IPT are comparable with those obtained by NCT, but higher than those obtained by the GAT. CCT values are correlated with IOP measurements with IPT, as it does in GAT and NCT, and should be always taken into consideration.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000500248&lng=en&tlng=enPaquimetria corneanaGlaucomaGlaucoma de ângulo abertoPressão intraocularTonometria ocular
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tatiana Sofia Monteiro Queirós
Márcia Clara Sá Rodrigues
Ana Carolina Pereira do Vale
Maria Josefina Costa Serino
Maria Teresa Leal Felgueiras Paínhas
Gabriel José Morgado Santos
Nuno Pedro Filipe da Costa e Lopes
spellingShingle Tatiana Sofia Monteiro Queirós
Márcia Clara Sá Rodrigues
Ana Carolina Pereira do Vale
Maria Josefina Costa Serino
Maria Teresa Leal Felgueiras Paínhas
Gabriel José Morgado Santos
Nuno Pedro Filipe da Costa e Lopes
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare PRO Tonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and non-contact tonometer in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
Paquimetria corneana
Glaucoma
Glaucoma de ângulo aberto
Pressão intraocular
Tonometria ocular
author_facet Tatiana Sofia Monteiro Queirós
Márcia Clara Sá Rodrigues
Ana Carolina Pereira do Vale
Maria Josefina Costa Serino
Maria Teresa Leal Felgueiras Paínhas
Gabriel José Morgado Santos
Nuno Pedro Filipe da Costa e Lopes
author_sort Tatiana Sofia Monteiro Queirós
title Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare PRO Tonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and non-contact tonometer in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
title_short Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare PRO Tonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and non-contact tonometer in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
title_full Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare PRO Tonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and non-contact tonometer in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
title_fullStr Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare PRO Tonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and non-contact tonometer in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Icare PRO Tonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and non-contact tonometer in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
title_sort comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between icare pro tonometer, goldmann applanation tonometer and non-contact tonometer in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
series Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
issn 1982-8551
description Abstract Purpose: To validate the comparative measurements of intraocular pressure performed with IcarePRO tonometer (IPT) in relation to Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and non-contact tonometer (NCT), as well as to evaluate the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on these values. Methods: This was a prospective and comparative study conducted during 6 months in the Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital de Braga, Portugal. The study population comprised two groups: healthy adults and adults with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). The IOP values were obtained by the three tonometers and the order of execution was randomly selected. CCT values were obtained by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results: A total of 168 eyes (74 with diagnosis of POAG and 94 healthy) of 84 patients were included in this study. The mean IOP values obtained by IPT, GAT and NCT were 17.36±3.78 mmHg; 14.59±3.32 mmHg; and 17.04±4.01 mmHg, respectively. The comparison between IPT and NCT did not reveal statistically significant differences in the two groups studied. However, statistically significant differences were obtained between IPT and GAT values (p <0.001). The IOP values, recorded by all the tonometers, were significantly and positivily correlated with the CCT (p <0.001). Conclusion: IOP readings measured by IPT are comparable with those obtained by NCT, but higher than those obtained by the GAT. CCT values are correlated with IOP measurements with IPT, as it does in GAT and NCT, and should be always taken into consideration.
topic Paquimetria corneana
Glaucoma
Glaucoma de ângulo aberto
Pressão intraocular
Tonometria ocular
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000500248&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT tatianasofiamonteiroqueiros comparisonofintraocularpressuremeasurementsbetweenicareprotonometergoldmannapplanationtonometerandnoncontacttonometerinhealthyandglaucomatouseyes
AT marciaclarasarodrigues comparisonofintraocularpressuremeasurementsbetweenicareprotonometergoldmannapplanationtonometerandnoncontacttonometerinhealthyandglaucomatouseyes
AT anacarolinapereiradovale comparisonofintraocularpressuremeasurementsbetweenicareprotonometergoldmannapplanationtonometerandnoncontacttonometerinhealthyandglaucomatouseyes
AT mariajosefinacostaserino comparisonofintraocularpressuremeasurementsbetweenicareprotonometergoldmannapplanationtonometerandnoncontacttonometerinhealthyandglaucomatouseyes
AT mariateresalealfelgueiraspainhas comparisonofintraocularpressuremeasurementsbetweenicareprotonometergoldmannapplanationtonometerandnoncontacttonometerinhealthyandglaucomatouseyes
AT gabrieljosemorgadosantos comparisonofintraocularpressuremeasurementsbetweenicareprotonometergoldmannapplanationtonometerandnoncontacttonometerinhealthyandglaucomatouseyes
AT nunopedrofilipedacostaelopes comparisonofintraocularpressuremeasurementsbetweenicareprotonometergoldmannapplanationtonometerandnoncontacttonometerinhealthyandglaucomatouseyes
_version_ 1725257735395606528