A Comparative and Critical Evaluation of Different Sampling Materials in the Measurement of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry

The selection of an odour sampling device and relative materials may influence the composition of the resulting odour sample. Current literature is limited to discussing how the measurement of emission rates derived from the same odour source could be related to materials and methods. There is there...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Zarra, M. Reiser, V. Naddeo, V. Belgiorno, M. Kranert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2012-09-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6991
id doaj-5daee6402a1440b5b7a79b4f8987a88b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5daee6402a1440b5b7a79b4f8987a88b2021-02-22T21:06:02ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162012-09-013010.3303/CET1230052A Comparative and Critical Evaluation of Different Sampling Materials in the Measurement of Odour Concentration by Dynamic OlfactometryT. ZarraM. ReiserV. NaddeoV. BelgiornoM. KranertThe selection of an odour sampling device and relative materials may influence the composition of the resulting odour sample. Current literature is limited to discussing how the measurement of emission rates derived from the same odour source could be related to materials and methods. There is therefore compelling evidence that current odour sampling practices should have greater regard for the fundamental physical and chemical principles, the nature of the odour source and the conditions created by the sampling device. Additional studies are necessary to identify the most appropriate situations under which the use of these devices may or may not be correct. The scope of this study is to investigate the influence on the determination of odour concentration with dynamic olfactometry, according to EN 13725 (2003) standards, applying different initial sampling condition, with the objective to define the optimal criteria to evaluate the odour concentration and obtain the highest repeatability and accuracy of the sensorial measure. A critical evaluation was carried out in relation to the same odour source with the comparison of sampling bag materials (Nalophantm, Tedlar®, TeflonTM) and intervals of time elapsed between the sampling and analysis phase (3, 7, 14, 30, 48 h). The results obtained show that the selection of an odour sampling materials may influence the composition of the resulting odour sample. There is therefore compelling evidence that current odour sampling practices should have regard for these factors and identify the situations under which these material and methods may be used appropriately.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6991
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. Zarra
M. Reiser
V. Naddeo
V. Belgiorno
M. Kranert
spellingShingle T. Zarra
M. Reiser
V. Naddeo
V. Belgiorno
M. Kranert
A Comparative and Critical Evaluation of Different Sampling Materials in the Measurement of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet T. Zarra
M. Reiser
V. Naddeo
V. Belgiorno
M. Kranert
author_sort T. Zarra
title A Comparative and Critical Evaluation of Different Sampling Materials in the Measurement of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry
title_short A Comparative and Critical Evaluation of Different Sampling Materials in the Measurement of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry
title_full A Comparative and Critical Evaluation of Different Sampling Materials in the Measurement of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry
title_fullStr A Comparative and Critical Evaluation of Different Sampling Materials in the Measurement of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative and Critical Evaluation of Different Sampling Materials in the Measurement of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry
title_sort comparative and critical evaluation of different sampling materials in the measurement of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometry
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2012-09-01
description The selection of an odour sampling device and relative materials may influence the composition of the resulting odour sample. Current literature is limited to discussing how the measurement of emission rates derived from the same odour source could be related to materials and methods. There is therefore compelling evidence that current odour sampling practices should have greater regard for the fundamental physical and chemical principles, the nature of the odour source and the conditions created by the sampling device. Additional studies are necessary to identify the most appropriate situations under which the use of these devices may or may not be correct. The scope of this study is to investigate the influence on the determination of odour concentration with dynamic olfactometry, according to EN 13725 (2003) standards, applying different initial sampling condition, with the objective to define the optimal criteria to evaluate the odour concentration and obtain the highest repeatability and accuracy of the sensorial measure. A critical evaluation was carried out in relation to the same odour source with the comparison of sampling bag materials (Nalophantm, Tedlar®, TeflonTM) and intervals of time elapsed between the sampling and analysis phase (3, 7, 14, 30, 48 h). The results obtained show that the selection of an odour sampling materials may influence the composition of the resulting odour sample. There is therefore compelling evidence that current odour sampling practices should have regard for these factors and identify the situations under which these material and methods may be used appropriately.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6991
work_keys_str_mv AT tzarra acomparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
AT mreiser acomparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
AT vnaddeo acomparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
AT vbelgiorno acomparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
AT mkranert acomparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
AT tzarra comparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
AT mreiser comparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
AT vnaddeo comparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
AT vbelgiorno comparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
AT mkranert comparativeandcriticalevaluationofdifferentsamplingmaterialsinthemeasurementofodourconcentrationbydynamicolfactometry
_version_ 1724256126861574144