On the Unfounded Enthusiasm for Soft Selective Sweeps III: The Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm That Isn’t
In the last 15 years or so, soft selective sweep mechanisms have been catapulted from a curiosity of little evolutionary importance to a ubiquitous mechanism claimed to explain most adaptive evolution and, in some cases, most evolution. This transformation was aided by a series of articles by Daniel...
Main Authors: | Eran Elhaik, Dan Graur |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Genes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/12/4/527 |
Similar Items
-
On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps II: Examining recent evidence from humans, flies, and viruses.
by: Rebecca B Harris, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Why isn’t everyone an Evolutionary Psychologist?
by: Darren eBurke
Published: (2014-08-01) -
Drug Resistance Evolution in HIV in the Late 1990s: Hard Sweeps, Soft Sweeps, Clonal Interference and the Accumulation of Drug Resistance Mutations
by: Kadie-Ann Williams, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
More effective drugs lead to harder selective sweeps in the evolution of drug resistance in HIV-1
by: Alison F Feder, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01) -
A Case Study on Curling Stone and Sweeping Effect According to Sweeping Conditions
by: Tae-Whan Kim, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)