A first-order second-moment calculation for seismic hazard assessment with the consideration of uncertain magnitude conversion

Earthquake size can be described with different magnitudes for different purposes. For example, local magnitude <i>M</i><sub>L</sub> is usually adopted to compile an earthquake catalog, and moment magnitude <i>M</i><sub>w</sub> is often prescribed by a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. P. Wang, X. Yun, Y.-M. Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-10-01
Series:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2649/2013/nhess-13-2649-2013.pdf
id doaj-5dd2cb1f73de44759a40fa9171a53114
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5dd2cb1f73de44759a40fa9171a531142020-11-25T00:59:48ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812013-10-0113102649265710.5194/nhess-13-2649-2013A first-order second-moment calculation for seismic hazard assessment with the consideration of uncertain magnitude conversionJ. P. WangX. YunY.-M. WuEarthquake size can be described with different magnitudes for different purposes. For example, local magnitude <i>M</i><sub>L</sub> is usually adopted to compile an earthquake catalog, and moment magnitude <i>M</i><sub>w</sub> is often prescribed by a ground motion model. Understandably, when inconsistent units are encountered in an earthquake analysis, magnitude conversion needs to be performed beforehand. However, the conversion is not expected at full certainty owing to the model error of empirical relationships. This paper introduces a novel first-order second-moment (FOSM) calculation to estimate the annual rate of earthquake motion (or seismic hazard) on a probabilistic basis, including the consideration of the uncertain magnitude conversion and three other sources of earthquake uncertainties. In addition to the methodology, this novel FOSM application to engineering seismology is demonstrated in this paper with a case study. With a local ground motion model, magnitude conversion relationship and earthquake catalog, the analysis shows that the best-estimate annual rate of peak ground acceleration (PGA) greater than 0.18 <i>g</i> (induced by earthquakes) is 0.002 per year at a site in Taipei, given the uncertainties of magnitude conversion, earthquake size, earthquake location, and motion attenuation.http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2649/2013/nhess-13-2649-2013.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. P. Wang
X. Yun
Y.-M. Wu
spellingShingle J. P. Wang
X. Yun
Y.-M. Wu
A first-order second-moment calculation for seismic hazard assessment with the consideration of uncertain magnitude conversion
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
author_facet J. P. Wang
X. Yun
Y.-M. Wu
author_sort J. P. Wang
title A first-order second-moment calculation for seismic hazard assessment with the consideration of uncertain magnitude conversion
title_short A first-order second-moment calculation for seismic hazard assessment with the consideration of uncertain magnitude conversion
title_full A first-order second-moment calculation for seismic hazard assessment with the consideration of uncertain magnitude conversion
title_fullStr A first-order second-moment calculation for seismic hazard assessment with the consideration of uncertain magnitude conversion
title_full_unstemmed A first-order second-moment calculation for seismic hazard assessment with the consideration of uncertain magnitude conversion
title_sort first-order second-moment calculation for seismic hazard assessment with the consideration of uncertain magnitude conversion
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
issn 1561-8633
1684-9981
publishDate 2013-10-01
description Earthquake size can be described with different magnitudes for different purposes. For example, local magnitude <i>M</i><sub>L</sub> is usually adopted to compile an earthquake catalog, and moment magnitude <i>M</i><sub>w</sub> is often prescribed by a ground motion model. Understandably, when inconsistent units are encountered in an earthquake analysis, magnitude conversion needs to be performed beforehand. However, the conversion is not expected at full certainty owing to the model error of empirical relationships. This paper introduces a novel first-order second-moment (FOSM) calculation to estimate the annual rate of earthquake motion (or seismic hazard) on a probabilistic basis, including the consideration of the uncertain magnitude conversion and three other sources of earthquake uncertainties. In addition to the methodology, this novel FOSM application to engineering seismology is demonstrated in this paper with a case study. With a local ground motion model, magnitude conversion relationship and earthquake catalog, the analysis shows that the best-estimate annual rate of peak ground acceleration (PGA) greater than 0.18 <i>g</i> (induced by earthquakes) is 0.002 per year at a site in Taipei, given the uncertainties of magnitude conversion, earthquake size, earthquake location, and motion attenuation.
url http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2649/2013/nhess-13-2649-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jpwang afirstordersecondmomentcalculationforseismichazardassessmentwiththeconsiderationofuncertainmagnitudeconversion
AT xyun afirstordersecondmomentcalculationforseismichazardassessmentwiththeconsiderationofuncertainmagnitudeconversion
AT ymwu afirstordersecondmomentcalculationforseismichazardassessmentwiththeconsiderationofuncertainmagnitudeconversion
AT jpwang firstordersecondmomentcalculationforseismichazardassessmentwiththeconsiderationofuncertainmagnitudeconversion
AT xyun firstordersecondmomentcalculationforseismichazardassessmentwiththeconsiderationofuncertainmagnitudeconversion
AT ymwu firstordersecondmomentcalculationforseismichazardassessmentwiththeconsiderationofuncertainmagnitudeconversion
_version_ 1725215996258549760