Long-term safety profile of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients: TEMPO Extension Japan Trial [Corrigendum]

Muto S, Okada T, Yasuda M, et al. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2017;9:93–104.On page 97, ‘Discussion’ section, lines 10–13, left column, the sentence: ‘Similarly, placebo patients who crossed over onto active treatment discontinued at a similar rate (24...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muto S, Okada T, Yasuda M, Tsubouchi H, Nakajima K, Horie S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2018-07-01
Series:Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/corrigendumlong-term-safety-profile-of-tolvaptan-in-autosomal-dominant-peer-reviewed-article-DHPS
id doaj-5dd441417b75490fa721f3cd9f9f0160
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5dd441417b75490fa721f3cd9f9f01602020-11-24T21:40:52ZengDove Medical PressDrug, Healthcare and Patient Safety1179-13652018-07-01Volume 10676839347Long-term safety profile of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients: TEMPO Extension Japan Trial [Corrigendum]Muto SOkada TYasuda MTsubouchi HNakajima KHorie SMuto S, Okada T, Yasuda M, et al. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2017;9:93–104.On page 97, ‘Discussion’ section, lines 10–13, left column, the sentence: ‘Similarly, placebo patients who crossed over onto active treatment discontinued at a similar rate (24.0%), while those who continued on tolvaptan treatment discontinued at a much lower rate (11.8%)’ should read: ‘Similarly, placebo patients who crossed over onto active treatment discontinued at a similar rate (26.0%), while those who continued on tolvaptan treatment discontinued at a much lower rate (10.6%)’. On page 101, Figure 6, the number of patients of ‘Completed trial’ in the TEMPO Extension Japan trial should be revised from ‘n=75’ to ‘n=76’, and ‘Withdrawal rate’ should also be revised from ‘11.8%’ to ‘10.6%’ in the allocated to tolvaptan in TEMPO 3:4 trial. The number of patients of ‘Completed trial’ in TEMPO Extension Japan trial should be revised from ‘n=38’ to ‘n=37’, and ‘Withdrawal rate’ should also be revised from ‘24.0%’ to ‘26.0%’ in the allocated to placebo in TEMPO 3:4 trial.Read the original article.https://www.dovepress.com/corrigendumlong-term-safety-profile-of-tolvaptan-in-autosomal-dominant-peer-reviewed-article-DHPS
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Muto S
Okada T
Yasuda M
Tsubouchi H
Nakajima K
Horie S
spellingShingle Muto S
Okada T
Yasuda M
Tsubouchi H
Nakajima K
Horie S
Long-term safety profile of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients: TEMPO Extension Japan Trial [Corrigendum]
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
author_facet Muto S
Okada T
Yasuda M
Tsubouchi H
Nakajima K
Horie S
author_sort Muto S
title Long-term safety profile of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients: TEMPO Extension Japan Trial [Corrigendum]
title_short Long-term safety profile of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients: TEMPO Extension Japan Trial [Corrigendum]
title_full Long-term safety profile of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients: TEMPO Extension Japan Trial [Corrigendum]
title_fullStr Long-term safety profile of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients: TEMPO Extension Japan Trial [Corrigendum]
title_full_unstemmed Long-term safety profile of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients: TEMPO Extension Japan Trial [Corrigendum]
title_sort long-term safety profile of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients: tempo extension japan trial [corrigendum]
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
issn 1179-1365
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Muto S, Okada T, Yasuda M, et al. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2017;9:93–104.On page 97, ‘Discussion’ section, lines 10–13, left column, the sentence: ‘Similarly, placebo patients who crossed over onto active treatment discontinued at a similar rate (24.0%), while those who continued on tolvaptan treatment discontinued at a much lower rate (11.8%)’ should read: ‘Similarly, placebo patients who crossed over onto active treatment discontinued at a similar rate (26.0%), while those who continued on tolvaptan treatment discontinued at a much lower rate (10.6%)’. On page 101, Figure 6, the number of patients of ‘Completed trial’ in the TEMPO Extension Japan trial should be revised from ‘n=75’ to ‘n=76’, and ‘Withdrawal rate’ should also be revised from ‘11.8%’ to ‘10.6%’ in the allocated to tolvaptan in TEMPO 3:4 trial. The number of patients of ‘Completed trial’ in TEMPO Extension Japan trial should be revised from ‘n=38’ to ‘n=37’, and ‘Withdrawal rate’ should also be revised from ‘24.0%’ to ‘26.0%’ in the allocated to placebo in TEMPO 3:4 trial.Read the original article.
url https://www.dovepress.com/corrigendumlong-term-safety-profile-of-tolvaptan-in-autosomal-dominant-peer-reviewed-article-DHPS
work_keys_str_mv AT mutos longtermsafetyprofileoftolvaptaninautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydiseasepatientstempoextensionjapantrialcorrigendum
AT okadat longtermsafetyprofileoftolvaptaninautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydiseasepatientstempoextensionjapantrialcorrigendum
AT yasudam longtermsafetyprofileoftolvaptaninautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydiseasepatientstempoextensionjapantrialcorrigendum
AT tsubouchih longtermsafetyprofileoftolvaptaninautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydiseasepatientstempoextensionjapantrialcorrigendum
AT nakajimak longtermsafetyprofileoftolvaptaninautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydiseasepatientstempoextensionjapantrialcorrigendum
AT hories longtermsafetyprofileoftolvaptaninautosomaldominantpolycystickidneydiseasepatientstempoextensionjapantrialcorrigendum
_version_ 1725924184543985664