Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative

The Gottesman-Knill theorem states that a Clifford circuit acting on stabilizer states can be simulated efficiently on a classical computer. Recently, this result has been generalized to cover inputs that are close to a coherent superposition of logarithmically many stabilizer states. The runtime of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arne Heimendahl, Felipe Montealegre-Mora, Frank Vallentin, David Gross
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften 2021-02-01
Series:Quantum
Online Access:https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2021-02-24-400/pdf/
id doaj-5dfa32d105a2445db7a3cbb34d23c865
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5dfa32d105a2445db7a3cbb34d23c8652021-03-01T20:14:01ZengVerein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den QuantenwissenschaftenQuantum2521-327X2021-02-01540010.22331/q-2021-02-24-40010.22331/q-2021-02-24-400Stabilizer extent is not multiplicativeArne HeimendahlFelipe Montealegre-MoraFrank VallentinDavid GrossThe Gottesman-Knill theorem states that a Clifford circuit acting on stabilizer states can be simulated efficiently on a classical computer. Recently, this result has been generalized to cover inputs that are close to a coherent superposition of logarithmically many stabilizer states. The runtime of the classical simulation is governed by the $\textit{stabilizer extent}$, which roughly measures how many stabilizer states are needed to approximate the state. An important open problem is to decide whether the extent is multiplicative under tensor products. An affirmative answer would yield an efficient algorithm for computing the extent of product inputs, while a negative result implies the existence of more efficient classical algorithms for simulating largescale quantum circuits. Here, we answer this question in the negative. Our result follows from very general properties of the set of stabilizer states, such as having a size that scales subexponentially in the dimension, and can thus be readily adapted to similar constructions for other resource theories.https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2021-02-24-400/pdf/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arne Heimendahl
Felipe Montealegre-Mora
Frank Vallentin
David Gross
spellingShingle Arne Heimendahl
Felipe Montealegre-Mora
Frank Vallentin
David Gross
Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative
Quantum
author_facet Arne Heimendahl
Felipe Montealegre-Mora
Frank Vallentin
David Gross
author_sort Arne Heimendahl
title Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative
title_short Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative
title_full Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative
title_fullStr Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative
title_full_unstemmed Stabilizer extent is not multiplicative
title_sort stabilizer extent is not multiplicative
publisher Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
series Quantum
issn 2521-327X
publishDate 2021-02-01
description The Gottesman-Knill theorem states that a Clifford circuit acting on stabilizer states can be simulated efficiently on a classical computer. Recently, this result has been generalized to cover inputs that are close to a coherent superposition of logarithmically many stabilizer states. The runtime of the classical simulation is governed by the $\textit{stabilizer extent}$, which roughly measures how many stabilizer states are needed to approximate the state. An important open problem is to decide whether the extent is multiplicative under tensor products. An affirmative answer would yield an efficient algorithm for computing the extent of product inputs, while a negative result implies the existence of more efficient classical algorithms for simulating largescale quantum circuits. Here, we answer this question in the negative. Our result follows from very general properties of the set of stabilizer states, such as having a size that scales subexponentially in the dimension, and can thus be readily adapted to similar constructions for other resource theories.
url https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2021-02-24-400/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT arneheimendahl stabilizerextentisnotmultiplicative
AT felipemontealegremora stabilizerextentisnotmultiplicative
AT frankvallentin stabilizerextentisnotmultiplicative
AT davidgross stabilizerextentisnotmultiplicative
_version_ 1724246012386607104