Convergence on Policy Goals: Character Education in East Asia and England

The goal of character building in east Asian countries is often presented as a shared cultural construct and positioned within an east-west dichotomy. However, it is not at all clear that east Asian forms of character education are identifiable and distinct or that they always transcend national and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Arthur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Malaya 2016-10-01
Series:Journal of International and Comparative Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jice.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/10512/1Arthur.pdf
id doaj-5e6e9a76f63b4ec099ec573a25388d38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e6e9a76f63b4ec099ec573a25388d382020-11-25T00:05:07ZengUniversity of MalayaJournal of International and Comparative Education2232-18022289-25672016-10-0152597110.14425/jice.2016.5.2.59Convergence on Policy Goals: Character Education in East Asia and EnglandJames Arthur0University of BirminghamThe goal of character building in east Asian countries is often presented as a shared cultural construct and positioned within an east-west dichotomy. However, it is not at all clear that east Asian forms of character education are identifiable and distinct or that they always transcend national and cultural values. Jeynes (2008) has cautioned us to remember that cultural differences limit the extent to which we can learn lessons from another country, but how authoritative is this caution? The English Secretary of State for Education, Nicky Morgan, announced in December 2014 that she intended to secure England’s place as a global leader by expanding the nation’s provision and evidence base for character education. In this context, this article asks whether England shares any commonalities in the so-called east-west dichotomy on character education – are they mutually exclusive or are they compatible. Is there a west–individual view and an east - collective view? Is the character education movement in east Asia more of an ideological and political movement? As the British government looks for policy solutions to new and challenging problems, including character education, what answers can it find from abroad? What can it learn, borrow or pinch from these east Asian countries and is there a convergence on policy goals for character education within and across these countries? The paper is based on the work (translated) of prominent east Asian academics and builds on the author’s personal interface with officials in the Ministry of Education in Japan and Singapore as well as meetings and conferences with numerous academics in universities across east Asian countries to address these questions.http://jice.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/10512/1Arthur.pdfcharacterinternational comparisonsvaluesmorals and schooling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Arthur
spellingShingle James Arthur
Convergence on Policy Goals: Character Education in East Asia and England
Journal of International and Comparative Education
character
international comparisons
values
morals and schooling
author_facet James Arthur
author_sort James Arthur
title Convergence on Policy Goals: Character Education in East Asia and England
title_short Convergence on Policy Goals: Character Education in East Asia and England
title_full Convergence on Policy Goals: Character Education in East Asia and England
title_fullStr Convergence on Policy Goals: Character Education in East Asia and England
title_full_unstemmed Convergence on Policy Goals: Character Education in East Asia and England
title_sort convergence on policy goals: character education in east asia and england
publisher University of Malaya
series Journal of International and Comparative Education
issn 2232-1802
2289-2567
publishDate 2016-10-01
description The goal of character building in east Asian countries is often presented as a shared cultural construct and positioned within an east-west dichotomy. However, it is not at all clear that east Asian forms of character education are identifiable and distinct or that they always transcend national and cultural values. Jeynes (2008) has cautioned us to remember that cultural differences limit the extent to which we can learn lessons from another country, but how authoritative is this caution? The English Secretary of State for Education, Nicky Morgan, announced in December 2014 that she intended to secure England’s place as a global leader by expanding the nation’s provision and evidence base for character education. In this context, this article asks whether England shares any commonalities in the so-called east-west dichotomy on character education – are they mutually exclusive or are they compatible. Is there a west–individual view and an east - collective view? Is the character education movement in east Asia more of an ideological and political movement? As the British government looks for policy solutions to new and challenging problems, including character education, what answers can it find from abroad? What can it learn, borrow or pinch from these east Asian countries and is there a convergence on policy goals for character education within and across these countries? The paper is based on the work (translated) of prominent east Asian academics and builds on the author’s personal interface with officials in the Ministry of Education in Japan and Singapore as well as meetings and conferences with numerous academics in universities across east Asian countries to address these questions.
topic character
international comparisons
values
morals and schooling
url http://jice.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/10512/1Arthur.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesarthur convergenceonpolicygoalscharactereducationineastasiaandengland
_version_ 1725426224128327680