Doing connoisseurship. Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Introductory remarks
The introduction seeks to concretize and expand on crucial connoisseurial practices such as comparing or verbalising. Starting from the three domains of connoisseurship, namely the judgment of an artwork’s quality, the attribution to an artist, and the question whether the art work is an original or...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Art Historiography |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/heyder-intro.pdf |
id |
doaj-5e9f91bb74f04f79909fac1ec517989b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5e9f91bb74f04f79909fac1ec517989b2021-07-04T09:45:37ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522021-06-012424JCH1doi.org/10.48352/uobxjah.00003417Doing connoisseurship. Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Introductory remarksJoris Corin Heyder0Eberhard Karls University TübingenThe introduction seeks to concretize and expand on crucial connoisseurial practices such as comparing or verbalising. Starting from the three domains of connoisseurship, namely the judgment of an artwork’s quality, the attribution to an artist, and the question whether the art work is an original or a copy, it becomes apparent that connoisseurial practices still play a remarkable role in art historical endeavors. This can be demonstrated with a look at the contributions, which are bringing together and reflecting both historical and current connoisseurial practices. https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/heyder-intro.pdfconnoisseurshippracticescomparingjudgingpractice theorymethodology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Joris Corin Heyder |
spellingShingle |
Joris Corin Heyder Doing connoisseurship. Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Introductory remarks Journal of Art Historiography connoisseurship practices comparing judging practice theory methodology |
author_facet |
Joris Corin Heyder |
author_sort |
Joris Corin Heyder |
title |
Doing connoisseurship. Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Introductory remarks |
title_short |
Doing connoisseurship. Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Introductory remarks |
title_full |
Doing connoisseurship. Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Introductory remarks |
title_fullStr |
Doing connoisseurship. Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Introductory remarks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Doing connoisseurship. Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Introductory remarks |
title_sort |
doing connoisseurship. yesterday, today, tomorrow. introductory remarks |
publisher |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham |
series |
Journal of Art Historiography |
issn |
2042-4752 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
The introduction seeks to concretize and expand on crucial connoisseurial practices such as comparing or verbalising. Starting from the three domains of connoisseurship, namely the judgment of an artwork’s quality, the attribution to an artist, and the question whether the art work is an original or a copy, it becomes apparent that connoisseurial practices still play a remarkable role in art historical endeavors. This can be demonstrated with a look at the contributions, which are bringing together and reflecting both historical and current connoisseurial practices. |
topic |
connoisseurship practices comparing judging practice theory methodology |
url |
https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/heyder-intro.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joriscorinheyder doingconnoisseurshipyesterdaytodaytomorrowintroductoryremarks |
_version_ |
1721320732040888320 |