The Future of Mapping – 3D Maps, the Comparison of two of the Most Used Methods in Photogrammetric Field

In the last 15 years, mapping technology has become a necessity in smart cities planning. And 2D are starting to be augmented by 3D maps. 3D Maps are already used in the cartographic field, to create a three-dimensional view of the terrain and buildings. In this paper we address the concept of 3D Ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Picu Iuliana Cuibac, Dragomir P., Peters R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2020-0018
id doaj-5ebdc0f4649548df93663e6126dfbed1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ebdc0f4649548df93663e6126dfbed12021-09-06T19:41:30ZengSciendoJournal of Applied Engineering Sciences2247-37692284-71972020-12-0110211912410.2478/jaes-2020-0018jaes-2020-0018The Future of Mapping – 3D Maps, the Comparison of two of the Most Used Methods in Photogrammetric FieldPicu Iuliana Cuibac0Dragomir P.1Peters R.2National Center of Cartography, Cartography and Photogrammetry Department, 012101 / Doctoral School, Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, 020396, RomaniaFaculty of Geodesy, Topography and Cadastre Department, Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, TheNetherlandsIn the last 15 years, mapping technology has become a necessity in smart cities planning. And 2D are starting to be augmented by 3D maps. 3D Maps are already used in the cartographic field, to create a three-dimensional view of the terrain and buildings. In this paper we address the concept of 3D Maps and we compare two methods to generate such maps. In this study two 3D maps were built, one using photogrammetric 3D stereo-restitution and one using automatic extrusion from a LiDAR point cloud and a set of 2D vector polygons. Upon comparison of these maps, we have concluded that the accuracy of the two maps is very similar and it depends very much on the input data and we have observed that creating a precise 3D map in photogrammetric environment takes much longer than the one built using the LiDAR point cloud. As 3D maps become the future of mapping, there is a continuous need for more accurate and complete field data to be collected and processed. Once more detailed field data becomes available, a clear conclusion on which of the methods provide us with a more accurate 3D map could be drawn. The evolution of 3D mapping is rapidly growing together with the applications developed to use it, especially in surveying and material monitoring. The key to future development of smart cities in based on better designs and infrastructures, and 3D mapping technology is a vital instrument to assist such a development.https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2020-00183d mapsstereo-restitutionextrusiongeodatabasefootprint3d modellidar
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Picu Iuliana Cuibac
Dragomir P.
Peters R.
spellingShingle Picu Iuliana Cuibac
Dragomir P.
Peters R.
The Future of Mapping – 3D Maps, the Comparison of two of the Most Used Methods in Photogrammetric Field
Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences
3d maps
stereo-restitution
extrusion
geodatabase
footprint
3d model
lidar
author_facet Picu Iuliana Cuibac
Dragomir P.
Peters R.
author_sort Picu Iuliana Cuibac
title The Future of Mapping – 3D Maps, the Comparison of two of the Most Used Methods in Photogrammetric Field
title_short The Future of Mapping – 3D Maps, the Comparison of two of the Most Used Methods in Photogrammetric Field
title_full The Future of Mapping – 3D Maps, the Comparison of two of the Most Used Methods in Photogrammetric Field
title_fullStr The Future of Mapping – 3D Maps, the Comparison of two of the Most Used Methods in Photogrammetric Field
title_full_unstemmed The Future of Mapping – 3D Maps, the Comparison of two of the Most Used Methods in Photogrammetric Field
title_sort future of mapping – 3d maps, the comparison of two of the most used methods in photogrammetric field
publisher Sciendo
series Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences
issn 2247-3769
2284-7197
publishDate 2020-12-01
description In the last 15 years, mapping technology has become a necessity in smart cities planning. And 2D are starting to be augmented by 3D maps. 3D Maps are already used in the cartographic field, to create a three-dimensional view of the terrain and buildings. In this paper we address the concept of 3D Maps and we compare two methods to generate such maps. In this study two 3D maps were built, one using photogrammetric 3D stereo-restitution and one using automatic extrusion from a LiDAR point cloud and a set of 2D vector polygons. Upon comparison of these maps, we have concluded that the accuracy of the two maps is very similar and it depends very much on the input data and we have observed that creating a precise 3D map in photogrammetric environment takes much longer than the one built using the LiDAR point cloud. As 3D maps become the future of mapping, there is a continuous need for more accurate and complete field data to be collected and processed. Once more detailed field data becomes available, a clear conclusion on which of the methods provide us with a more accurate 3D map could be drawn. The evolution of 3D mapping is rapidly growing together with the applications developed to use it, especially in surveying and material monitoring. The key to future development of smart cities in based on better designs and infrastructures, and 3D mapping technology is a vital instrument to assist such a development.
topic 3d maps
stereo-restitution
extrusion
geodatabase
footprint
3d model
lidar
url https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2020-0018
work_keys_str_mv AT picuiulianacuibac thefutureofmapping3dmapsthecomparisonoftwoofthemostusedmethodsinphotogrammetricfield
AT dragomirp thefutureofmapping3dmapsthecomparisonoftwoofthemostusedmethodsinphotogrammetricfield
AT petersr thefutureofmapping3dmapsthecomparisonoftwoofthemostusedmethodsinphotogrammetricfield
AT picuiulianacuibac futureofmapping3dmapsthecomparisonoftwoofthemostusedmethodsinphotogrammetricfield
AT dragomirp futureofmapping3dmapsthecomparisonoftwoofthemostusedmethodsinphotogrammetricfield
AT petersr futureofmapping3dmapsthecomparisonoftwoofthemostusedmethodsinphotogrammetricfield
_version_ 1717766106636091392