A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer

Abstract Background Although clinical trials have investigated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer, none have investigated the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 71 NSCLC patients including 33 treated with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taisuke Isono, Naho Kagiyama, Shun Shibata, Hitomi Nakajima, Yuma Matsui, Kenji Takano, Takashi Nishida, Chiaki Hosoda, Eriko Kawate, Yoichi Kobayashi, Takashi Ishiguro, Yotaro Takaku, Kazuyoshi Kurashima, Tsutomu Yanagisawa, Noboru Takayanagi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-05-01
Series:Thoracic Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13915
id doaj-5ef23fc521cd4c0baccdca9b0b6b437b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ef23fc521cd4c0baccdca9b0b6b437b2021-05-02T23:54:27ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142021-05-011291387139710.1111/1759-7714.13915A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancerTaisuke Isono0Naho Kagiyama1Shun Shibata2Hitomi Nakajima3Yuma Matsui4Kenji Takano5Takashi Nishida6Chiaki Hosoda7Eriko Kawate8Yoichi Kobayashi9Takashi Ishiguro10Yotaro Takaku11Kazuyoshi Kurashima12Tsutomu Yanagisawa13Noboru Takayanagi14Department of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Saitama JapanAbstract Background Although clinical trials have investigated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer, none have investigated the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 71 NSCLC patients including 33 treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (combination therapy group) and 38 treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (monotherapy group) from 1 May 2016 to 31 August 2020. Results Eleven of 33 (33.3%) patients in the combination therapy group and 37 of 38 (97.4%) patients in the monotherapy group had programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. Objective response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the combination therapy group and monotherapy group (54.5% vs. 47.4, p = 0.637 and 16.6 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.463). In patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%, ORR and median OS were not different between the combination therapy group and the monotherapy group (63.6% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.499 and not reached vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.976). Thirty‐three (100%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) in the combination therapy group and 32 (84.2%) in the monotherapy group. Treatment discontinuation at 1 year due to AEs occurred more frequently in the combination therapy group (45.2%) than in the monotherapy group (21.1%). Conclusion There was no significant difference in ORR and OS between the two groups, and treatment discontinuation was more frequent in the combination group. A randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab for first‐line treatment in patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13915adverse eventcombination therapyimmune checkpoint inhibitoroverall survivaltreatment discontinuation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taisuke Isono
Naho Kagiyama
Shun Shibata
Hitomi Nakajima
Yuma Matsui
Kenji Takano
Takashi Nishida
Chiaki Hosoda
Eriko Kawate
Yoichi Kobayashi
Takashi Ishiguro
Yotaro Takaku
Kazuyoshi Kurashima
Tsutomu Yanagisawa
Noboru Takayanagi
spellingShingle Taisuke Isono
Naho Kagiyama
Shun Shibata
Hitomi Nakajima
Yuma Matsui
Kenji Takano
Takashi Nishida
Chiaki Hosoda
Eriko Kawate
Yoichi Kobayashi
Takashi Ishiguro
Yotaro Takaku
Kazuyoshi Kurashima
Tsutomu Yanagisawa
Noboru Takayanagi
A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
Thoracic Cancer
adverse event
combination therapy
immune checkpoint inhibitor
overall survival
treatment discontinuation
author_facet Taisuke Isono
Naho Kagiyama
Shun Shibata
Hitomi Nakajima
Yuma Matsui
Kenji Takano
Takashi Nishida
Chiaki Hosoda
Eriko Kawate
Yoichi Kobayashi
Takashi Ishiguro
Yotaro Takaku
Kazuyoshi Kurashima
Tsutomu Yanagisawa
Noboru Takayanagi
author_sort Taisuke Isono
title A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_short A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
title_sort retrospective analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer
publisher Wiley
series Thoracic Cancer
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background Although clinical trials have investigated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer, none have investigated the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 71 NSCLC patients including 33 treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (combination therapy group) and 38 treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (monotherapy group) from 1 May 2016 to 31 August 2020. Results Eleven of 33 (33.3%) patients in the combination therapy group and 37 of 38 (97.4%) patients in the monotherapy group had programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. Objective response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the combination therapy group and monotherapy group (54.5% vs. 47.4, p = 0.637 and 16.6 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.463). In patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%, ORR and median OS were not different between the combination therapy group and the monotherapy group (63.6% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.499 and not reached vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.976). Thirty‐three (100%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) in the combination therapy group and 32 (84.2%) in the monotherapy group. Treatment discontinuation at 1 year due to AEs occurred more frequently in the combination therapy group (45.2%) than in the monotherapy group (21.1%). Conclusion There was no significant difference in ORR and OS between the two groups, and treatment discontinuation was more frequent in the combination group. A randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab for first‐line treatment in patients with PD‐L1 TPS ≥50%.
topic adverse event
combination therapy
immune checkpoint inhibitor
overall survival
treatment discontinuation
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13915
work_keys_str_mv AT taisukeisono aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nahokagiyama aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT shunshibata aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hitominakajima aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yumamatsui aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kenjitakano aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takashinishida aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chiakihosoda aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT erikokawate aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yoichikobayashi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takashiishiguro aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yotarotakaku aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kazuyoshikurashima aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT tsutomuyanagisawa aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT noborutakayanagi aretrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT taisukeisono retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nahokagiyama retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT shunshibata retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hitominakajima retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yumamatsui retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kenjitakano retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takashinishida retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chiakihosoda retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT erikokawate retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yoichikobayashi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT takashiishiguro retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yotarotakaku retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kazuyoshikurashima retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT tsutomuyanagisawa retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT noborutakayanagi retrospectiveanalysisofpembrolizumabpluschemotherapyversuspembrolizumabmonotherapyforadvancedorrecurrentnonsmallcelllungcancer
_version_ 1721486508534267904