Public Attitudes and Private Prejudices: Assessing Voters’ Willingness to Vote for Out Lesbian and Gay Candidates

Our study concerns the factors leading to the electoral success and failure of LGBTQ candidates in the context of the changing nature of prejudices. We hypothesize that more positive views toward “respectability candidates,” as captured by familial status, has replaced explicit prejudice toward out...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joanna Everitt, Laszlo Horvath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.662095/full
id doaj-5ef274d3ecad450ea8452fc4ed0274c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ef274d3ecad450ea8452fc4ed0274c52021-06-28T06:18:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Political Science2673-31452021-06-01310.3389/fpos.2021.662095662095Public Attitudes and Private Prejudices: Assessing Voters’ Willingness to Vote for Out Lesbian and Gay CandidatesJoanna Everitt0Laszlo Horvath1Department of History & Politics, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, CanadaQ-Step Centre, Department of Politics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United KingdomOur study concerns the factors leading to the electoral success and failure of LGBTQ candidates in the context of the changing nature of prejudices. We hypothesize that more positive views toward “respectability candidates,” as captured by familial status, has replaced explicit prejudice toward out LGBTQ candidates in societies where acceptance of sexual minorities in general has grown. In a survey experiment conducted with a sample of Canadian voters, one of the first countries to legalize marriage equality, we find suggestions that voters are more likely to reward lesbian and gay candidates who adopt heteronormative relationships (married with children vs. single) than those who do not. These patterns become more evident when we explore causal heterogeneity with controls for individual-level characteristics and attitudes that typically predict support toward lesbian and gay candidates. Here we find these predictors rewarded single lesbian and gay candidates, whereas lesbian and gay candidates with families were simply more supported across the board.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.662095/fullLGBTQ candidatessurvey experimentaffinity votingfamilial statuscausal heterogeneity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joanna Everitt
Laszlo Horvath
spellingShingle Joanna Everitt
Laszlo Horvath
Public Attitudes and Private Prejudices: Assessing Voters’ Willingness to Vote for Out Lesbian and Gay Candidates
Frontiers in Political Science
LGBTQ candidates
survey experiment
affinity voting
familial status
causal heterogeneity
author_facet Joanna Everitt
Laszlo Horvath
author_sort Joanna Everitt
title Public Attitudes and Private Prejudices: Assessing Voters’ Willingness to Vote for Out Lesbian and Gay Candidates
title_short Public Attitudes and Private Prejudices: Assessing Voters’ Willingness to Vote for Out Lesbian and Gay Candidates
title_full Public Attitudes and Private Prejudices: Assessing Voters’ Willingness to Vote for Out Lesbian and Gay Candidates
title_fullStr Public Attitudes and Private Prejudices: Assessing Voters’ Willingness to Vote for Out Lesbian and Gay Candidates
title_full_unstemmed Public Attitudes and Private Prejudices: Assessing Voters’ Willingness to Vote for Out Lesbian and Gay Candidates
title_sort public attitudes and private prejudices: assessing voters’ willingness to vote for out lesbian and gay candidates
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Political Science
issn 2673-3145
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Our study concerns the factors leading to the electoral success and failure of LGBTQ candidates in the context of the changing nature of prejudices. We hypothesize that more positive views toward “respectability candidates,” as captured by familial status, has replaced explicit prejudice toward out LGBTQ candidates in societies where acceptance of sexual minorities in general has grown. In a survey experiment conducted with a sample of Canadian voters, one of the first countries to legalize marriage equality, we find suggestions that voters are more likely to reward lesbian and gay candidates who adopt heteronormative relationships (married with children vs. single) than those who do not. These patterns become more evident when we explore causal heterogeneity with controls for individual-level characteristics and attitudes that typically predict support toward lesbian and gay candidates. Here we find these predictors rewarded single lesbian and gay candidates, whereas lesbian and gay candidates with families were simply more supported across the board.
topic LGBTQ candidates
survey experiment
affinity voting
familial status
causal heterogeneity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.662095/full
work_keys_str_mv AT joannaeveritt publicattitudesandprivateprejudicesassessingvoterswillingnesstovoteforoutlesbianandgaycandidates
AT laszlohorvath publicattitudesandprivateprejudicesassessingvoterswillingnesstovoteforoutlesbianandgaycandidates
_version_ 1721356853926952960