Bakhtin's "Theory" of Genre

The originality of Bakhtin's fragmentary and partial theory of literary genre is underlined in this article. Bakhtin's reflexion on genre is very different from that of his Formalist contemporaries. Instead of proposing elaborate typologies or generic categories, Bakhtin more often devotes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clive Thomson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: New Prairie Press 1984-09-01
Series:Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature
Online Access:http://newprairiepress.org/sttcl/vol9/iss1/4
id doaj-5efa0f73423e455283b8e43f5c34caba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5efa0f73423e455283b8e43f5c34caba2020-11-24T20:57:06ZengNew Prairie PressStudies in 20th & 21st Century Literature2334-44151984-09-019110.4148/2334-4415.11505591208Bakhtin's "Theory" of GenreClive ThomsonThe originality of Bakhtin's fragmentary and partial theory of literary genre is underlined in this article. Bakhtin's reflexion on genre is very different from that of his Formalist contemporaries. Instead of proposing elaborate typologies or generic categories, Bakhtin more often devotes his attention to showing that a meaningful approach to the topic must be diachronic. From an epistemological point of view, the possibility of exact duplication or repetition of the same generic device from text to text is denied. Each text (or reading of a text) is a new performance in which generic material is reworked and re-presented. There are affinities, therefore, between the positions of Bakhtin and Fredric Jameson (in The Political Unconscious ). Generic categories are useful only if they are seen as diagnostic tools which help us to better understand how texts enter into dialogic relations with each other.http://newprairiepress.org/sttcl/vol9/iss1/4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clive Thomson
spellingShingle Clive Thomson
Bakhtin's "Theory" of Genre
Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature
author_facet Clive Thomson
author_sort Clive Thomson
title Bakhtin's "Theory" of Genre
title_short Bakhtin's "Theory" of Genre
title_full Bakhtin's "Theory" of Genre
title_fullStr Bakhtin's "Theory" of Genre
title_full_unstemmed Bakhtin's "Theory" of Genre
title_sort bakhtin's "theory" of genre
publisher New Prairie Press
series Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature
issn 2334-4415
publishDate 1984-09-01
description The originality of Bakhtin's fragmentary and partial theory of literary genre is underlined in this article. Bakhtin's reflexion on genre is very different from that of his Formalist contemporaries. Instead of proposing elaborate typologies or generic categories, Bakhtin more often devotes his attention to showing that a meaningful approach to the topic must be diachronic. From an epistemological point of view, the possibility of exact duplication or repetition of the same generic device from text to text is denied. Each text (or reading of a text) is a new performance in which generic material is reworked and re-presented. There are affinities, therefore, between the positions of Bakhtin and Fredric Jameson (in The Political Unconscious ). Generic categories are useful only if they are seen as diagnostic tools which help us to better understand how texts enter into dialogic relations with each other.
url http://newprairiepress.org/sttcl/vol9/iss1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT clivethomson bakhtinstheoryofgenre
_version_ 1716788783335079936