Rindal and Elchinov: An (Impending) Revolution in EU Law on Patient Mobility?

This paper critically analyses EU law on patient mobility, which has developed in the last decade. It covers the European Court of Justice case law applying internal market rules to social security coverage of foreign health treatment, its relationship with the EU rules on the co-ordination of socia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tomislav Sokol
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2010-12-01
Series:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/97
id doaj-5f167727294140249b4a0f72e5118562
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f167727294140249b4a0f72e51185622020-11-25T03:38:32ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of LawCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy1845-56621848-99582010-12-01616720810.3935/cyelp.06.2010.97Rindal and Elchinov: An (Impending) Revolution in EU Law on Patient Mobility?Tomislav Sokol0KU Leuven Institute for Social LawThis paper critically analyses EU law on patient mobility, which has developed in the last decade. It covers the European Court of Justice case law applying internal market rules to social security coverage of foreign health treatment, its relationship with the EU rules on the co-ordination of social security systems, and the recent attempts at codifying the case law. The most recent EFTA Court judgment in the Rindal case, and its potential effects on EU law if the Court of Justice adopts the same reasoning in the pending Elchinov case, are investigated. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the implications of EU law on patient mobility on national social security systems, namely their autonomy to define the scope of their coverage of health care treatment, and the consequences, within the framework of EU law, of applying certain legal techniques to define their social packages. Special emphasis is put on the new EU Member States and Croatia. It is argued that these states are in a particularly delicate position in relation to EU law in terms of maintaining the financial stability and the social (in terms of solidarity) character of their social security systems. The paper proposes certain solutions to accomplish a twofold objective: improving legal certainty at the European level (thus facilitating the free movement of patients), while, at the same time, respecting the Member States’ freedom to organise their social systems, in order to protect the solidarity on which those systems are based.https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/97patient mobilityeuropean court of justicesocial security coverageinternal marketefta courtrindal caseelchinov case
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tomislav Sokol
spellingShingle Tomislav Sokol
Rindal and Elchinov: An (Impending) Revolution in EU Law on Patient Mobility?
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
patient mobility
european court of justice
social security coverage
internal market
efta court
rindal case
elchinov case
author_facet Tomislav Sokol
author_sort Tomislav Sokol
title Rindal and Elchinov: An (Impending) Revolution in EU Law on Patient Mobility?
title_short Rindal and Elchinov: An (Impending) Revolution in EU Law on Patient Mobility?
title_full Rindal and Elchinov: An (Impending) Revolution in EU Law on Patient Mobility?
title_fullStr Rindal and Elchinov: An (Impending) Revolution in EU Law on Patient Mobility?
title_full_unstemmed Rindal and Elchinov: An (Impending) Revolution in EU Law on Patient Mobility?
title_sort rindal and elchinov: an (impending) revolution in eu law on patient mobility?
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
series Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
issn 1845-5662
1848-9958
publishDate 2010-12-01
description This paper critically analyses EU law on patient mobility, which has developed in the last decade. It covers the European Court of Justice case law applying internal market rules to social security coverage of foreign health treatment, its relationship with the EU rules on the co-ordination of social security systems, and the recent attempts at codifying the case law. The most recent EFTA Court judgment in the Rindal case, and its potential effects on EU law if the Court of Justice adopts the same reasoning in the pending Elchinov case, are investigated. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the implications of EU law on patient mobility on national social security systems, namely their autonomy to define the scope of their coverage of health care treatment, and the consequences, within the framework of EU law, of applying certain legal techniques to define their social packages. Special emphasis is put on the new EU Member States and Croatia. It is argued that these states are in a particularly delicate position in relation to EU law in terms of maintaining the financial stability and the social (in terms of solidarity) character of their social security systems. The paper proposes certain solutions to accomplish a twofold objective: improving legal certainty at the European level (thus facilitating the free movement of patients), while, at the same time, respecting the Member States’ freedom to organise their social systems, in order to protect the solidarity on which those systems are based.
topic patient mobility
european court of justice
social security coverage
internal market
efta court
rindal case
elchinov case
url https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/97
work_keys_str_mv AT tomislavsokol rindalandelchinovanimpendingrevolutionineulawonpatientmobility
_version_ 1724541851749318656