Making Nature Valuable, Not Profitable: Are Payments for Ecosystem Services Suitable for Degrowth?

The growth economy imposes multiple crises on humanity and the natural world. To challenge this economic growth imperative, the degrowth movement emerges as a dissident response. Although within an economic growth perspective, payments for ecosystem services (PES) have also been proposed to attenuat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigo Muniz, Maria João Cruz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-08-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/10895
id doaj-5f1eab8bd744489ca46d599cac7505ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f1eab8bd744489ca46d599cac7505ea2020-11-24T23:29:39ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502015-08-0178108951092110.3390/su70810895su70810895Making Nature Valuable, Not Profitable: Are Payments for Ecosystem Services Suitable for Degrowth?Rodrigo Muniz0Maria João Cruz1Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Modelling (CCIAM), Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon 1749-016, PortugalClimate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Modelling (CCIAM), Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon 1749-016, PortugalThe growth economy imposes multiple crises on humanity and the natural world. To challenge this economic growth imperative, the degrowth movement emerges as a dissident response. Although within an economic growth perspective, payments for ecosystem services (PES) have also been proposed to attenuate the negative impacts of capitalism, as a redistributive mechanism that is claimed to deliver equitable conservation and sustainability. Degrowth has notably similar concerns, although it is inclined to argue against PES traditional ideologies and practices, which lead conservation to perceive nature within economic growth and market ideologies, diminishing the relationship between humans and nature. In spite of that, PES are becoming a strong trend in environmental governance. This paper attempts to examine whether PES are, and how they could be suitable for degrowth, through the lens of its main sources. In order to integrate PES and degrowth, it could require a PES reconceptualization. Although we assert that PES are not the most appropriate instrument for conservation, we argue that maybe PES could contribute to degrowth as a transition instrument toward fostering better practices. However, it is important to elucidate how they can be used and under which circumstances they could be appropriate.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/10895payments for ecosystem servicesdegrowthbiodiversity conservationnaturevaluablecommodificationneoliberal conservationtransition practices incentive
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rodrigo Muniz
Maria João Cruz
spellingShingle Rodrigo Muniz
Maria João Cruz
Making Nature Valuable, Not Profitable: Are Payments for Ecosystem Services Suitable for Degrowth?
Sustainability
payments for ecosystem services
degrowth
biodiversity conservation
nature
valuable
commodification
neoliberal conservation
transition practices incentive
author_facet Rodrigo Muniz
Maria João Cruz
author_sort Rodrigo Muniz
title Making Nature Valuable, Not Profitable: Are Payments for Ecosystem Services Suitable for Degrowth?
title_short Making Nature Valuable, Not Profitable: Are Payments for Ecosystem Services Suitable for Degrowth?
title_full Making Nature Valuable, Not Profitable: Are Payments for Ecosystem Services Suitable for Degrowth?
title_fullStr Making Nature Valuable, Not Profitable: Are Payments for Ecosystem Services Suitable for Degrowth?
title_full_unstemmed Making Nature Valuable, Not Profitable: Are Payments for Ecosystem Services Suitable for Degrowth?
title_sort making nature valuable, not profitable: are payments for ecosystem services suitable for degrowth?
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2015-08-01
description The growth economy imposes multiple crises on humanity and the natural world. To challenge this economic growth imperative, the degrowth movement emerges as a dissident response. Although within an economic growth perspective, payments for ecosystem services (PES) have also been proposed to attenuate the negative impacts of capitalism, as a redistributive mechanism that is claimed to deliver equitable conservation and sustainability. Degrowth has notably similar concerns, although it is inclined to argue against PES traditional ideologies and practices, which lead conservation to perceive nature within economic growth and market ideologies, diminishing the relationship between humans and nature. In spite of that, PES are becoming a strong trend in environmental governance. This paper attempts to examine whether PES are, and how they could be suitable for degrowth, through the lens of its main sources. In order to integrate PES and degrowth, it could require a PES reconceptualization. Although we assert that PES are not the most appropriate instrument for conservation, we argue that maybe PES could contribute to degrowth as a transition instrument toward fostering better practices. However, it is important to elucidate how they can be used and under which circumstances they could be appropriate.
topic payments for ecosystem services
degrowth
biodiversity conservation
nature
valuable
commodification
neoliberal conservation
transition practices incentive
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/10895
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigomuniz makingnaturevaluablenotprofitablearepaymentsforecosystemservicessuitablefordegrowth
AT mariajoaocruz makingnaturevaluablenotprofitablearepaymentsforecosystemservicessuitablefordegrowth
_version_ 1725544360772108288