Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frictional resistance generated by conventional stainless steel, radiance ceramic bracket, self-ligating and composite brackets using a 0.019 × 0.025 stainless steel straight length wires in a 022 slot and to select brackets bas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ajith R Pillai, Anil Gangadharan, Satheesh Kumar, Anwar Shah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2014;volume=6;issue=5;spage=150;epage=155;aulast=Pillai
id doaj-5f419ed1c12d417d8744200c54e52100
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f419ed1c12d417d8744200c54e521002020-11-25T00:07:54ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74060976-48792014-01-016515015510.4103/0975-7406.137429Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro studyAjith R PillaiAnil GangadharanSatheesh KumarAnwar ShahBackground and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frictional resistance generated by conventional stainless steel, radiance ceramic bracket, self-ligating and composite brackets using a 0.019 × 0.025 stainless steel straight length wires in a 022 slot and to select brackets based on their frictional characteristic. Methodology: In order to conduct this study, four different types of bracket system were selected of the mclaughlin-bennet-trevesi (MBT) discipline. They are Group 1 - stainless steel, Group 2 - composite bracket Group 3 - (American Orthodontics) radiance ceramic bracket Group 4 - self-ligating bracket (SLB) (Empower). In this study, five maxillary brackets of an arch of each type were used. All brackets are 0.022 × 0.028" in preadjusted edgewise appliance which simulates the dental arch. Five brackets were bonded to a stainless steel bar of dimension 150 mm × 25 mm × 3 mm. The bracket-arch wire units were submitted to mechanical test with an Instron universal testing machine 3365. A testing apparatus or holding jig was designed to hold the bracket during the mechanical test. Each sample was pulled at a speed of 6 mm for 1 min. Descriptive statistical information including mean and standard deviation of maximum friction force was calculated for each bracket wire combination. Interpretation and Conclusion: The SLB has the least friction among the four groups. The ceramic bracket showed the highest friction followed by stainless steel bracket, composite bracket, and SLB.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2014;volume=6;issue=5;spage=150;epage=155;aulast=PillaiInstronorthodontic bracketsstainless steel arch wire
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ajith R Pillai
Anil Gangadharan
Satheesh Kumar
Anwar Shah
spellingShingle Ajith R Pillai
Anil Gangadharan
Satheesh Kumar
Anwar Shah
Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Instron
orthodontic brackets
stainless steel arch wire
author_facet Ajith R Pillai
Anil Gangadharan
Satheesh Kumar
Anwar Shah
author_sort Ajith R Pillai
title Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study
title_short Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study
title_full Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study
title_sort comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: an in vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
issn 0975-7406
0976-4879
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frictional resistance generated by conventional stainless steel, radiance ceramic bracket, self-ligating and composite brackets using a 0.019 × 0.025 stainless steel straight length wires in a 022 slot and to select brackets based on their frictional characteristic. Methodology: In order to conduct this study, four different types of bracket system were selected of the mclaughlin-bennet-trevesi (MBT) discipline. They are Group 1 - stainless steel, Group 2 - composite bracket Group 3 - (American Orthodontics) radiance ceramic bracket Group 4 - self-ligating bracket (SLB) (Empower). In this study, five maxillary brackets of an arch of each type were used. All brackets are 0.022 × 0.028" in preadjusted edgewise appliance which simulates the dental arch. Five brackets were bonded to a stainless steel bar of dimension 150 mm × 25 mm × 3 mm. The bracket-arch wire units were submitted to mechanical test with an Instron universal testing machine 3365. A testing apparatus or holding jig was designed to hold the bracket during the mechanical test. Each sample was pulled at a speed of 6 mm for 1 min. Descriptive statistical information including mean and standard deviation of maximum friction force was calculated for each bracket wire combination. Interpretation and Conclusion: The SLB has the least friction among the four groups. The ceramic bracket showed the highest friction followed by stainless steel bracket, composite bracket, and SLB.
topic Instron
orthodontic brackets
stainless steel arch wire
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2014;volume=6;issue=5;spage=150;epage=155;aulast=Pillai
work_keys_str_mv AT ajithrpillai comparisonofthefrictionalresistancebetweenarchwireanddifferentbracketsystemaninvitrostudy
AT anilgangadharan comparisonofthefrictionalresistancebetweenarchwireanddifferentbracketsystemaninvitrostudy
AT satheeshkumar comparisonofthefrictionalresistancebetweenarchwireanddifferentbracketsystemaninvitrostudy
AT anwarshah comparisonofthefrictionalresistancebetweenarchwireanddifferentbracketsystemaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1725417855846973440