Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a method for systematic review of studies with different designs
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Diabetes in pregnancy, which includes gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is associated with poor outcomes for both mother and infant during pregnancy, at birth and in the longer term. Recent inte...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/11/104 |
id |
doaj-5f5123c9685b4f0aa25ac780de849223 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5f5123c9685b4f0aa25ac780de8492232020-11-24T23:28:19ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932011-12-0111110410.1186/1471-2393-11-104Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a method for systematic review of studies with different designsChamberlain CatherineYore DanielLi HangWilliams EmilyOldenburg BrianOats JeremyMcNamara BridgetteEades Sandra<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Diabetes in pregnancy, which includes gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is associated with poor outcomes for both mother and infant during pregnancy, at birth and in the longer term. Recent international guidelines recommend changes to the current GDM screening criteria. While some controversy remains, there appears to be consensus that women at high risk of T2DM, including indigenous women, should be offered screening for GDM early in pregnancy, rather than waiting until 24-28 weeks as is current practice. A range of criteria should be considered before changing screening practice in a population sub-group, including: prevalence, current practice, acceptability and whether adequate treatment pathways and follow-up systems are available. There are also specific issues related to screening in pregnancy and indigenous populations. The evidence that these criteria are met for indigenous populations is yet to be reported. A range of study designs can be considered to generate relevant evidence for these issues, including epidemiological, observational, qualitative, and intervention studies, which are not usually included within a single systematic review. The aim of this paper is to describe the methods we used to systematically review studies of different designs and present the evidence in a pragmatic format for policy discussion.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The inclusion criteria will be broad to ensure inclusion of the critical perspectives of indigenous women. Abstracts of the search results will be reviewed by two persons; the full texts of all potentially eligible papers will be reviewed by one person, and 10% will be checked by a second person for validation. Data extraction will be standardised, using existing tools to identify risks for bias in intervention, measurement, qualitative studies and reviews; and adapting criteria for appraising risk for bias in descriptive studies. External validity (generalisability) will also be appraised. The main findings will be synthesised according to the criteria for population-based screening and summarised in an adapted "GRADE" tool.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This will be the first systematic review of all the published literature on diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women. The method provides a pragmatic approach for synthesizing relevant evidence from a range of study designs to inform the current policy discussion.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/11/104 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chamberlain Catherine Yore Daniel Li Hang Williams Emily Oldenburg Brian Oats Jeremy McNamara Bridgette Eades Sandra |
spellingShingle |
Chamberlain Catherine Yore Daniel Li Hang Williams Emily Oldenburg Brian Oats Jeremy McNamara Bridgette Eades Sandra Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a method for systematic review of studies with different designs BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
author_facet |
Chamberlain Catherine Yore Daniel Li Hang Williams Emily Oldenburg Brian Oats Jeremy McNamara Bridgette Eades Sandra |
author_sort |
Chamberlain Catherine |
title |
Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a method for systematic review of studies with different designs |
title_short |
Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a method for systematic review of studies with different designs |
title_full |
Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a method for systematic review of studies with different designs |
title_fullStr |
Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a method for systematic review of studies with different designs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a method for systematic review of studies with different designs |
title_sort |
diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women in australia, canada, new zealand, and the united states: a method for systematic review of studies with different designs |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
issn |
1471-2393 |
publishDate |
2011-12-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Diabetes in pregnancy, which includes gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is associated with poor outcomes for both mother and infant during pregnancy, at birth and in the longer term. Recent international guidelines recommend changes to the current GDM screening criteria. While some controversy remains, there appears to be consensus that women at high risk of T2DM, including indigenous women, should be offered screening for GDM early in pregnancy, rather than waiting until 24-28 weeks as is current practice. A range of criteria should be considered before changing screening practice in a population sub-group, including: prevalence, current practice, acceptability and whether adequate treatment pathways and follow-up systems are available. There are also specific issues related to screening in pregnancy and indigenous populations. The evidence that these criteria are met for indigenous populations is yet to be reported. A range of study designs can be considered to generate relevant evidence for these issues, including epidemiological, observational, qualitative, and intervention studies, which are not usually included within a single systematic review. The aim of this paper is to describe the methods we used to systematically review studies of different designs and present the evidence in a pragmatic format for policy discussion.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The inclusion criteria will be broad to ensure inclusion of the critical perspectives of indigenous women. Abstracts of the search results will be reviewed by two persons; the full texts of all potentially eligible papers will be reviewed by one person, and 10% will be checked by a second person for validation. Data extraction will be standardised, using existing tools to identify risks for bias in intervention, measurement, qualitative studies and reviews; and adapting criteria for appraising risk for bias in descriptive studies. External validity (generalisability) will also be appraised. The main findings will be synthesised according to the criteria for population-based screening and summarised in an adapted "GRADE" tool.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This will be the first systematic review of all the published literature on diabetes in pregnancy among indigenous women. The method provides a pragmatic approach for synthesizing relevant evidence from a range of study designs to inform the current policy discussion.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/11/104 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chamberlaincatherine diabetesinpregnancyamongindigenouswomeninaustraliacanadanewzealandandtheunitedstatesamethodforsystematicreviewofstudieswithdifferentdesigns AT yoredaniel diabetesinpregnancyamongindigenouswomeninaustraliacanadanewzealandandtheunitedstatesamethodforsystematicreviewofstudieswithdifferentdesigns AT lihang diabetesinpregnancyamongindigenouswomeninaustraliacanadanewzealandandtheunitedstatesamethodforsystematicreviewofstudieswithdifferentdesigns AT williamsemily diabetesinpregnancyamongindigenouswomeninaustraliacanadanewzealandandtheunitedstatesamethodforsystematicreviewofstudieswithdifferentdesigns AT oldenburgbrian diabetesinpregnancyamongindigenouswomeninaustraliacanadanewzealandandtheunitedstatesamethodforsystematicreviewofstudieswithdifferentdesigns AT oatsjeremy diabetesinpregnancyamongindigenouswomeninaustraliacanadanewzealandandtheunitedstatesamethodforsystematicreviewofstudieswithdifferentdesigns AT mcnamarabridgette diabetesinpregnancyamongindigenouswomeninaustraliacanadanewzealandandtheunitedstatesamethodforsystematicreviewofstudieswithdifferentdesigns AT eadessandra diabetesinpregnancyamongindigenouswomeninaustraliacanadanewzealandandtheunitedstatesamethodforsystematicreviewofstudieswithdifferentdesigns |
_version_ |
1725549791606210560 |