Examination of cross contamination risks between hospitals by external medical staff via cross-sectional intercept survey of hand hygiene

[english] Introduction: Work in hospitals is supported by contributions of life sciences industry representatives (IR) in various ways of fields. Close contact between them, caretakers and patients is unavoidable, even in situations where hygiene is critical.The present study investigates whether IR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schiffers, Hank, Zaatreh, Sarah, Mittelmeier, Wolfram, Bader, Rainer
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2014-08-01
Series:GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/dgkh/2014-9/dgkh000231.shtml
id doaj-5f6fb0d7466d4d3b8d60d5948f020275
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f6fb0d7466d4d3b8d60d5948f0202752020-11-25T02:11:22ZdeuGerman Medical Science GMS Publishing HouseGMS Hygiene and Infection Control2196-52262014-08-0192Doc1110.3205/dgkh000231Examination of cross contamination risks between hospitals by external medical staff via cross-sectional intercept survey of hand hygieneSchiffers, Hank0Zaatreh, Sarah1Mittelmeier, Wolfram2Bader, Rainer3The Physician Executive MBA, University of Tennessee, USA – based in Düsseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, GermanyDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, GermanyDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany[english] Introduction: Work in hospitals is supported by contributions of life sciences industry representatives (IR) in various ways of fields. Close contact between them, caretakers and patients is unavoidable, even in situations where hygiene is critical.The present study investigates whether IR display comparable levels of and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) contamination after being exposed to a shared environment for a minimum of 4 hours.Material and methods: An anonymous survey to sample a group of healthcare professionals for traces of fingertip contamination was performed. We used dip slides ( and MRSA) to evaluate professionals at the medical exhibition MEDICA. After applying exclusion criteria 298 participants remained valid, they consisted of 208 industry representatives, 49 nurses and 41 physicians.Results: IR where engaged in hospitals, operating rooms and outpatient clinics (82%, 41.8%, 51.9% respectively). 65.9% of IR (vs. 48.8% physicians and 40.8% nurses) carried a microbiological burden ≥10 CFU (colony forming units). Neither (≥10 CFU) in IR (40.9%) did show statistical differences in contamination patterns in comparison to physicians (43.9%, p=0.346) and nurses (36.7%, p=0.878) nor did MRSA (physicians p=0.579, nurses p=0.908). We were unable to differentiate transient from pre-existing permanent colonization.Conclusion: Exposure to the same environment may result in similar hand contamination patterns of IR when compared caregivers. This supports the concern that industry representatives can cause cross infection between hospitals and hygiene sensitive areas like operation room, intensive care unit and central sterilization units particularly. Further study is required to clarify whether pre-existing bacterial colonization is an influencing factor and how industry is taking care of this to create a safe working environment for their employees, the customers and ultimately the patients.http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/dgkh/2014-9/dgkh000231.shtmlStaphylococcus aureusmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureushand hygienecross-infectioncross-hospital contamination
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Schiffers, Hank
Zaatreh, Sarah
Mittelmeier, Wolfram
Bader, Rainer
spellingShingle Schiffers, Hank
Zaatreh, Sarah
Mittelmeier, Wolfram
Bader, Rainer
Examination of cross contamination risks between hospitals by external medical staff via cross-sectional intercept survey of hand hygiene
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
Staphylococcus aureus
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
hand hygiene
cross-infection
cross-hospital contamination
author_facet Schiffers, Hank
Zaatreh, Sarah
Mittelmeier, Wolfram
Bader, Rainer
author_sort Schiffers, Hank
title Examination of cross contamination risks between hospitals by external medical staff via cross-sectional intercept survey of hand hygiene
title_short Examination of cross contamination risks between hospitals by external medical staff via cross-sectional intercept survey of hand hygiene
title_full Examination of cross contamination risks between hospitals by external medical staff via cross-sectional intercept survey of hand hygiene
title_fullStr Examination of cross contamination risks between hospitals by external medical staff via cross-sectional intercept survey of hand hygiene
title_full_unstemmed Examination of cross contamination risks between hospitals by external medical staff via cross-sectional intercept survey of hand hygiene
title_sort examination of cross contamination risks between hospitals by external medical staff via cross-sectional intercept survey of hand hygiene
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
series GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
issn 2196-5226
publishDate 2014-08-01
description [english] Introduction: Work in hospitals is supported by contributions of life sciences industry representatives (IR) in various ways of fields. Close contact between them, caretakers and patients is unavoidable, even in situations where hygiene is critical.The present study investigates whether IR display comparable levels of and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) contamination after being exposed to a shared environment for a minimum of 4 hours.Material and methods: An anonymous survey to sample a group of healthcare professionals for traces of fingertip contamination was performed. We used dip slides ( and MRSA) to evaluate professionals at the medical exhibition MEDICA. After applying exclusion criteria 298 participants remained valid, they consisted of 208 industry representatives, 49 nurses and 41 physicians.Results: IR where engaged in hospitals, operating rooms and outpatient clinics (82%, 41.8%, 51.9% respectively). 65.9% of IR (vs. 48.8% physicians and 40.8% nurses) carried a microbiological burden ≥10 CFU (colony forming units). Neither (≥10 CFU) in IR (40.9%) did show statistical differences in contamination patterns in comparison to physicians (43.9%, p=0.346) and nurses (36.7%, p=0.878) nor did MRSA (physicians p=0.579, nurses p=0.908). We were unable to differentiate transient from pre-existing permanent colonization.Conclusion: Exposure to the same environment may result in similar hand contamination patterns of IR when compared caregivers. This supports the concern that industry representatives can cause cross infection between hospitals and hygiene sensitive areas like operation room, intensive care unit and central sterilization units particularly. Further study is required to clarify whether pre-existing bacterial colonization is an influencing factor and how industry is taking care of this to create a safe working environment for their employees, the customers and ultimately the patients.
topic Staphylococcus aureus
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
hand hygiene
cross-infection
cross-hospital contamination
url http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/dgkh/2014-9/dgkh000231.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT schiffershank examinationofcrosscontaminationrisksbetweenhospitalsbyexternalmedicalstaffviacrosssectionalinterceptsurveyofhandhygiene
AT zaatrehsarah examinationofcrosscontaminationrisksbetweenhospitalsbyexternalmedicalstaffviacrosssectionalinterceptsurveyofhandhygiene
AT mittelmeierwolfram examinationofcrosscontaminationrisksbetweenhospitalsbyexternalmedicalstaffviacrosssectionalinterceptsurveyofhandhygiene
AT baderrainer examinationofcrosscontaminationrisksbetweenhospitalsbyexternalmedicalstaffviacrosssectionalinterceptsurveyofhandhygiene
_version_ 1724914618051067904