Differences in the Contribution of CD4+ T Cells to Proislet and Islet Allograft Rejection Correlate with Constitutive Class II MHC Alloantigen Expression

• Main Authors: Charmaine J. Simeonovic, Debra J. Brown, Michelle J. Townsend, J. Dennis Wilson
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 1996-09-01
• Series: Cell Transplantation
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/096368979600500503

Allografts of BALB/c (H-2d) fetal proislets facilitated long-term (>100 days) reversal of streptozotocin-induced diabetes in CBA/H (H-2k) mice treated with a combination of anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 mAbs. Anti-CD8 monotherapy was partially effective in restoring normoglycemia but anti-CD4 mAb treatment of host animals failed to promote allograft function. In contrast, allografts of BALB/c adult islets demonstrated indefinite reversal of diabetes in recipient mice treated only with anti-CD8 mAb. Anti-CD4 monotherapy resulted in only transient restoration of normoglycemia. These findings clearly demonstrate (1) a critical role for CD8 T cells in the acute rejection of pancreatic islet tissue allografts and (2) tissue-specific differences in the participation of CD4 T cells as primary effectors in the rejection reaction. Immunohistochemical studies showed that the capacity for CD4 T cells to initiate the rejection of proislet but not adult islet allografts correlates with the presence/absence, respectively, of graft parenchymal cells that constitutively express Class II MHC alloantigens. Proislet grafts, unlike transplants of purified adult islets, contain heterogeneous tissue components including Class II MHC+ve duct epithelium. Thus, the participation of CD8 and CD4 T cells as primary effectors of graft rejection depends on which class or classes of MHC antigens are constitutively expressed on graft parenchymal cells and are available for recognition. Islet tissue in both rejecting proislet and islet allografts showed de novo induction of Class II MHC alloantigens only after severe disruption to islet architecture had been achieved by infiltrating mononuclear cells. Thus, at this stage of advanced allograft injury, CD4 T cells have the potential to act as secondary effectors, possibly by amplifying the inflammatory reaction and thus accelerating graft destruction. The capacity for antirejection mAb therapy to establish transplant tolerance was facilitated in the islet allograft model where it was necessary to target only the CD8 T cell subpopulation.