Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia

Background and Aims : Rising health costs are challenging anesthesiologists to search for cost-effective anesthetic techniques. We conducted a study to estimate variable cost per case and cost of drug wastage as percentage of total drug cost associated with different modalities of general anesthesia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rohit Malhotra, Nishant Kumar, Aruna Jain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2020;volume=36;issue=2;spage=219;epage=226;aulast=Malhotra
id doaj-5ffd70bf94e84ef28d150398d0687483
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ffd70bf94e84ef28d150398d06874832020-11-25T02:51:21ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology0970-91852020-01-0136221922610.4103/joacp.JOACP_77_19Cost identification analysis of general anesthesiaRohit MalhotraNishant KumarAruna JainBackground and Aims : Rising health costs are challenging anesthesiologists to search for cost-effective anesthetic techniques. We conducted a study to estimate variable cost per case and cost of drug wastage as percentage of total drug cost associated with different modalities of general anesthesia (GA). Material and Methods: This prospective study was carried out after approval by institutional ethical committee in 258 adult patients aged 18–60 years of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, with a surgical duration of 1–4 hours, posted for elective surgery under GA with endotracheal intubation. At the end of surgery, total utilization of each drug, anesthetic gases, and consumables were noted and remaining drug was regarded as wastage. Cost was recorded as per maximum retail price for that particular brand in the market at start of study and total cost was calculated. For purpose of analysis, cases were divided into low flow sevoflurane, high flow sevoflurane, high flow isoflurane, low flow isoflurane, and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Results: The mean variable cost was highest with TIVA (₹2713.82 ± 509.57) and lowest with low flow isoflurane (₹1981.62 ± 335.03; P < 0.001). Drug wastage was 13.1% overall, with highest in low sevoflurane group and lowest in TIVA. Conclusion: Low flow anesthesia with isoflurane is more cost-effective as compared to high flow techniques and TIVA even for short duration surgeries. Rational use of drugs and consumables and minimizing wastage can further reduce anesthesia costs.http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2020;volume=36;issue=2;spage=219;epage=226;aulast=Malhotralow flow anesthesiapharmacoeconomicstotal intravenous anesthesia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rohit Malhotra
Nishant Kumar
Aruna Jain
spellingShingle Rohit Malhotra
Nishant Kumar
Aruna Jain
Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
low flow anesthesia
pharmacoeconomics
total intravenous anesthesia
author_facet Rohit Malhotra
Nishant Kumar
Aruna Jain
author_sort Rohit Malhotra
title Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_short Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_full Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_fullStr Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
title_sort cost identification analysis of general anesthesia
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
issn 0970-9185
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background and Aims : Rising health costs are challenging anesthesiologists to search for cost-effective anesthetic techniques. We conducted a study to estimate variable cost per case and cost of drug wastage as percentage of total drug cost associated with different modalities of general anesthesia (GA). Material and Methods: This prospective study was carried out after approval by institutional ethical committee in 258 adult patients aged 18–60 years of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, with a surgical duration of 1–4 hours, posted for elective surgery under GA with endotracheal intubation. At the end of surgery, total utilization of each drug, anesthetic gases, and consumables were noted and remaining drug was regarded as wastage. Cost was recorded as per maximum retail price for that particular brand in the market at start of study and total cost was calculated. For purpose of analysis, cases were divided into low flow sevoflurane, high flow sevoflurane, high flow isoflurane, low flow isoflurane, and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Results: The mean variable cost was highest with TIVA (₹2713.82 ± 509.57) and lowest with low flow isoflurane (₹1981.62 ± 335.03; P < 0.001). Drug wastage was 13.1% overall, with highest in low sevoflurane group and lowest in TIVA. Conclusion: Low flow anesthesia with isoflurane is more cost-effective as compared to high flow techniques and TIVA even for short duration surgeries. Rational use of drugs and consumables and minimizing wastage can further reduce anesthesia costs.
topic low flow anesthesia
pharmacoeconomics
total intravenous anesthesia
url http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2020;volume=36;issue=2;spage=219;epage=226;aulast=Malhotra
work_keys_str_mv AT rohitmalhotra costidentificationanalysisofgeneralanesthesia
AT nishantkumar costidentificationanalysisofgeneralanesthesia
AT arunajain costidentificationanalysisofgeneralanesthesia
_version_ 1724735151205777408