Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation

Quantifying the impact of biochemical compounds on collective cell spreading is an essential element of drug design, with various applications including developing treatments for chronic wounds and cancer. Scratch assays are a technically simple and inexpensive method used to study collective cell s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart T. Johnston, Matthew J. Simpson, D. L. Sean McElwain, Benjamin J. Binder, Joshua V. Ross
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2014-01-01
Series:Open Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsob.140097
id doaj-60031551c0674215bf022b672248e49a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-60031551c0674215bf022b672248e49a2020-11-25T03:57:03ZengThe Royal SocietyOpen Biology2046-24412014-01-014910.1098/rsob.140097140097Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computationStuart T. JohnstonMatthew J. SimpsonD. L. Sean McElwainBenjamin J. BinderJoshua V. RossQuantifying the impact of biochemical compounds on collective cell spreading is an essential element of drug design, with various applications including developing treatments for chronic wounds and cancer. Scratch assays are a technically simple and inexpensive method used to study collective cell spreading; however, most previous interpretations of scratch assays are qualitative and do not provide estimates of the cell diffusivity, D, or the cell proliferation rate, λ. Estimating D and λ is important for investigating the efficacy of a potential treatment and provides insight into the mechanism through which the potential treatment acts. While a few methods for estimating D and λ have been proposed, these previous methods lead to point estimates of D and λ, and provide no insight into the uncertainty in these estimates. Here, we compare various types of information that can be extracted from images of a scratch assay, and quantify D and λ using discrete computational simulations and approximate Bayesian computation. We show that it is possible to robustly recover estimates of D and λ from synthetic data, as well as a new set of experimental data. For the first time, our approach also provides a method to estimate the uncertainty in our estimates of D and λ. We anticipate that our approach can be generalized to deal with more realistic experimental scenarios in which we are interested in estimating D and λ, as well as additional relevant parameters such as the strength of cell-to-cell adhesion or the strength of cell-to-substrate adhesion.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsob.140097cell motilitycell proliferationscratch assayapproximate bayesian computationcancerpair correlation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stuart T. Johnston
Matthew J. Simpson
D. L. Sean McElwain
Benjamin J. Binder
Joshua V. Ross
spellingShingle Stuart T. Johnston
Matthew J. Simpson
D. L. Sean McElwain
Benjamin J. Binder
Joshua V. Ross
Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
Open Biology
cell motility
cell proliferation
scratch assay
approximate bayesian computation
cancer
pair correlation
author_facet Stuart T. Johnston
Matthew J. Simpson
D. L. Sean McElwain
Benjamin J. Binder
Joshua V. Ross
author_sort Stuart T. Johnston
title Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_short Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_full Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_fullStr Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate Bayesian computation
title_sort interpreting scratch assays using pair density dynamics and approximate bayesian computation
publisher The Royal Society
series Open Biology
issn 2046-2441
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Quantifying the impact of biochemical compounds on collective cell spreading is an essential element of drug design, with various applications including developing treatments for chronic wounds and cancer. Scratch assays are a technically simple and inexpensive method used to study collective cell spreading; however, most previous interpretations of scratch assays are qualitative and do not provide estimates of the cell diffusivity, D, or the cell proliferation rate, λ. Estimating D and λ is important for investigating the efficacy of a potential treatment and provides insight into the mechanism through which the potential treatment acts. While a few methods for estimating D and λ have been proposed, these previous methods lead to point estimates of D and λ, and provide no insight into the uncertainty in these estimates. Here, we compare various types of information that can be extracted from images of a scratch assay, and quantify D and λ using discrete computational simulations and approximate Bayesian computation. We show that it is possible to robustly recover estimates of D and λ from synthetic data, as well as a new set of experimental data. For the first time, our approach also provides a method to estimate the uncertainty in our estimates of D and λ. We anticipate that our approach can be generalized to deal with more realistic experimental scenarios in which we are interested in estimating D and λ, as well as additional relevant parameters such as the strength of cell-to-cell adhesion or the strength of cell-to-substrate adhesion.
topic cell motility
cell proliferation
scratch assay
approximate bayesian computation
cancer
pair correlation
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsob.140097
work_keys_str_mv AT stuarttjohnston interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation
AT matthewjsimpson interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation
AT dlseanmcelwain interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation
AT benjaminjbinder interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation
AT joshuavross interpretingscratchassaysusingpairdensitydynamicsandapproximatebayesiancomputation
_version_ 1724462282445946880