Las competencias autonómicas en inmigración tras la STC 31/2010

The paper analyzes the doctrine as in the STC 31/2010 as regards immigrationautonomous powers as drawn from the Catalan Statute of Autonomy. Itoverly rejects the approach taken by the Constitutional Court in the matteras long as it maintains the exclusive jurisdiction of the State in immigrationaffa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: José Antonio Montilla Martos
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern 2011-10-01
Series:Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf14_Montilla_tcm112-180565.pdf
id doaj-6050a7bb11fc4367b4e804ba3d9668e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6050a7bb11fc4367b4e804ba3d9668e12021-03-02T08:58:56ZcatInstitut d'Estudis de l'AutogovernRevista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals1886-26322011-10-0114152185Las competencias autonómicas en inmigración tras la STC 31/2010José Antonio Montilla MartosThe paper analyzes the doctrine as in the STC 31/2010 as regards immigrationautonomous powers as drawn from the Catalan Statute of Autonomy. Itoverly rejects the approach taken by the Constitutional Court in the matteras long as it maintains the exclusive jurisdiction of the State in immigrationaffaires while at the same time considering the statutory recognition of regionalpowers relative to immigration congruous with the Constitution. TheCourt considered that, despite the formal denomination, such public activitiesare not framed within immigration affaires but under other matters of competence.Against this position, the paper defends the availability of a statutoryjurisdiction in immigration affairs as from the evolution of the Stateexclusive jurisdiction contained in the Constitution, parallel to that occurredin other areas such as the administration of justice or international affaires.The paper highlights that, in any case, the Court has not limited the scopeof statutory powers but rather emphasizes that this is a conflict deriving fromopposing views as regards de denomination of the matter under discussionwhich, however minor, has brought about political upsetting.http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf14_Montilla_tcm112-180565.pdfimmigrationConstitutional Courtregions (autonomous communities)Statute of Autonomy.
collection DOAJ
language Catalan
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José Antonio Montilla Martos
spellingShingle José Antonio Montilla Martos
Las competencias autonómicas en inmigración tras la STC 31/2010
Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
immigration
Constitutional Court
regions (autonomous communities)
Statute of Autonomy.
author_facet José Antonio Montilla Martos
author_sort José Antonio Montilla Martos
title Las competencias autonómicas en inmigración tras la STC 31/2010
title_short Las competencias autonómicas en inmigración tras la STC 31/2010
title_full Las competencias autonómicas en inmigración tras la STC 31/2010
title_fullStr Las competencias autonómicas en inmigración tras la STC 31/2010
title_full_unstemmed Las competencias autonómicas en inmigración tras la STC 31/2010
title_sort las competencias autonómicas en inmigración tras la stc 31/2010
publisher Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern
series Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
issn 1886-2632
publishDate 2011-10-01
description The paper analyzes the doctrine as in the STC 31/2010 as regards immigrationautonomous powers as drawn from the Catalan Statute of Autonomy. Itoverly rejects the approach taken by the Constitutional Court in the matteras long as it maintains the exclusive jurisdiction of the State in immigrationaffaires while at the same time considering the statutory recognition of regionalpowers relative to immigration congruous with the Constitution. TheCourt considered that, despite the formal denomination, such public activitiesare not framed within immigration affaires but under other matters of competence.Against this position, the paper defends the availability of a statutoryjurisdiction in immigration affairs as from the evolution of the Stateexclusive jurisdiction contained in the Constitution, parallel to that occurredin other areas such as the administration of justice or international affaires.The paper highlights that, in any case, the Court has not limited the scopeof statutory powers but rather emphasizes that this is a conflict deriving fromopposing views as regards de denomination of the matter under discussionwhich, however minor, has brought about political upsetting.
topic immigration
Constitutional Court
regions (autonomous communities)
Statute of Autonomy.
url http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf14_Montilla_tcm112-180565.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT joseantoniomontillamartos lascompetenciasautonomicaseninmigraciontraslastc312010
_version_ 1724240176449847296