Surgery for azoospermia in the Indian patient: Why is it different?

Obstructive azoospermia is one of the few surgically correctable causes of male infertility. The outcomes of surgery in these patients are variable and often dependent upon the diagnosis and surgical expertise. We aimed to review the reported outcomes in Indian patients and evaluate potential reason...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rajeev Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2011-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2011;volume=27;issue=1;spage=98;epage=101;aulast=Kumar
id doaj-60a2e16773fa4047b614e305b171d8a3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-60a2e16773fa4047b614e305b171d8a32020-11-24T21:09:49ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242011-01-012719810110.4103/0970-1591.78441Surgery for azoospermia in the Indian patient: Why is it different?Rajeev KumarObstructive azoospermia is one of the few surgically correctable causes of male infertility. The outcomes of surgery in these patients are variable and often dependent upon the diagnosis and surgical expertise. We aimed to review the reported outcomes in Indian patients and evaluate potential reasons why these outcomes may be different from those reported from other regions. A search was performed on Medline/Pubmed using relevant keywords to identify publications from India on surgical management of azoospermia. The same search was repeated on Google and on the website of the Indian Journal of Urology. Personal emails were sent to prominent urologists performing surgery for azoospermia in India to obtain their opinions and reprints of their published articles. These were then reviewed. Very few articles were identified that pertained to the original search. A large majority of patients are diagnosed with idiopathic infertility. The outcomes of surgery where a clear diagnosis can be made are generally good and often comparable with the published literature. Infections are probably an under-diagnosed etiology. More research and publications are required to determine the etiology of obstructive azoospermia in the Indian men. These would help appropriate patient counseling and treatment.http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2011;volume=27;issue=1;spage=98;epage=101;aulast=KumarAzoospermiaIndiainfertilitymalevasoepidiymostomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajeev Kumar
spellingShingle Rajeev Kumar
Surgery for azoospermia in the Indian patient: Why is it different?
Indian Journal of Urology
Azoospermia
India
infertility
male
vasoepidiymostomy
author_facet Rajeev Kumar
author_sort Rajeev Kumar
title Surgery for azoospermia in the Indian patient: Why is it different?
title_short Surgery for azoospermia in the Indian patient: Why is it different?
title_full Surgery for azoospermia in the Indian patient: Why is it different?
title_fullStr Surgery for azoospermia in the Indian patient: Why is it different?
title_full_unstemmed Surgery for azoospermia in the Indian patient: Why is it different?
title_sort surgery for azoospermia in the indian patient: why is it different?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Urology
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Obstructive azoospermia is one of the few surgically correctable causes of male infertility. The outcomes of surgery in these patients are variable and often dependent upon the diagnosis and surgical expertise. We aimed to review the reported outcomes in Indian patients and evaluate potential reasons why these outcomes may be different from those reported from other regions. A search was performed on Medline/Pubmed using relevant keywords to identify publications from India on surgical management of azoospermia. The same search was repeated on Google and on the website of the Indian Journal of Urology. Personal emails were sent to prominent urologists performing surgery for azoospermia in India to obtain their opinions and reprints of their published articles. These were then reviewed. Very few articles were identified that pertained to the original search. A large majority of patients are diagnosed with idiopathic infertility. The outcomes of surgery where a clear diagnosis can be made are generally good and often comparable with the published literature. Infections are probably an under-diagnosed etiology. More research and publications are required to determine the etiology of obstructive azoospermia in the Indian men. These would help appropriate patient counseling and treatment.
topic Azoospermia
India
infertility
male
vasoepidiymostomy
url http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2011;volume=27;issue=1;spage=98;epage=101;aulast=Kumar
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeevkumar surgeryforazoospermiaintheindianpatientwhyisitdifferent
_version_ 1716757326446198784