Case-Control study of Firefighters with documented positive tuberculin skin test results using Quantiferon-TB testing in comparison with Firefighters with negative tuberculin skin test results

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Phoenix Firefighters have had abnormally high rates of tuberculin skin test (TBST) results on medical surveillance. The objectives of this study were to evaluate our firefighters using QuantiFERON-TB (QFT), comparing the results to t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gorter Forrest D, Kelley Patrick L, Dominguez John A, Reinhart Steven, Wernick Howard B, England Timothy L, Fleming James L, Papst Victor, LaDuke Alicia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-12-01
Series:Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Online Access:http://www.occup-med.com/content/1/1/28
id doaj-60ad50477ca04362bf067407dc69245f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-60ad50477ca04362bf067407dc69245f2020-11-24T22:58:12ZengBMCJournal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology1745-66732006-12-01112810.1186/1745-6673-1-28Case-Control study of Firefighters with documented positive tuberculin skin test results using Quantiferon-TB testing in comparison with Firefighters with negative tuberculin skin test resultsGorter Forrest DKelley Patrick LDominguez John AReinhart StevenWernick Howard BEngland Timothy LFleming James LPapst VictorLaDuke Alicia<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Phoenix Firefighters have had abnormally high rates of tuberculin skin test (TBST) results on medical surveillance. The objectives of this study were to evaluate our firefighters using QuantiFERON-TB (QFT), comparing the results to their TBST results.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using QFT results obtained during the study, we compared previously positive TBST responders (Cases) to negative responders (Controls). We also compared both groups for QFT results for <it>Mycobacterium avium </it>(MA) exposure.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>QFT effectively monitored our working population. 12.9% of the 148 cases, and 3.2% of the 220 controls had a positive QFT result. Another 14.8% of cases and 4.5% of controls had conditionally positive QFT results. There was an unusually high rate of MA response on QFT testing in both groups.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Phoenix Firefighters have a higher than expected TBST and QFT results, which cannot be explained by the increased MA rate. The decreased level of QFT positivity in comparison to TBST results may indicate a considerable false positive TBST rate. The QFT offers many advantages as a surveillance method over TBST in exposed worker populations.</p> http://www.occup-med.com/content/1/1/28
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gorter Forrest D
Kelley Patrick L
Dominguez John A
Reinhart Steven
Wernick Howard B
England Timothy L
Fleming James L
Papst Victor
LaDuke Alicia
spellingShingle Gorter Forrest D
Kelley Patrick L
Dominguez John A
Reinhart Steven
Wernick Howard B
England Timothy L
Fleming James L
Papst Victor
LaDuke Alicia
Case-Control study of Firefighters with documented positive tuberculin skin test results using Quantiferon-TB testing in comparison with Firefighters with negative tuberculin skin test results
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
author_facet Gorter Forrest D
Kelley Patrick L
Dominguez John A
Reinhart Steven
Wernick Howard B
England Timothy L
Fleming James L
Papst Victor
LaDuke Alicia
author_sort Gorter Forrest D
title Case-Control study of Firefighters with documented positive tuberculin skin test results using Quantiferon-TB testing in comparison with Firefighters with negative tuberculin skin test results
title_short Case-Control study of Firefighters with documented positive tuberculin skin test results using Quantiferon-TB testing in comparison with Firefighters with negative tuberculin skin test results
title_full Case-Control study of Firefighters with documented positive tuberculin skin test results using Quantiferon-TB testing in comparison with Firefighters with negative tuberculin skin test results
title_fullStr Case-Control study of Firefighters with documented positive tuberculin skin test results using Quantiferon-TB testing in comparison with Firefighters with negative tuberculin skin test results
title_full_unstemmed Case-Control study of Firefighters with documented positive tuberculin skin test results using Quantiferon-TB testing in comparison with Firefighters with negative tuberculin skin test results
title_sort case-control study of firefighters with documented positive tuberculin skin test results using quantiferon-tb testing in comparison with firefighters with negative tuberculin skin test results
publisher BMC
series Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
issn 1745-6673
publishDate 2006-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Phoenix Firefighters have had abnormally high rates of tuberculin skin test (TBST) results on medical surveillance. The objectives of this study were to evaluate our firefighters using QuantiFERON-TB (QFT), comparing the results to their TBST results.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using QFT results obtained during the study, we compared previously positive TBST responders (Cases) to negative responders (Controls). We also compared both groups for QFT results for <it>Mycobacterium avium </it>(MA) exposure.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>QFT effectively monitored our working population. 12.9% of the 148 cases, and 3.2% of the 220 controls had a positive QFT result. Another 14.8% of cases and 4.5% of controls had conditionally positive QFT results. There was an unusually high rate of MA response on QFT testing in both groups.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Phoenix Firefighters have a higher than expected TBST and QFT results, which cannot be explained by the increased MA rate. The decreased level of QFT positivity in comparison to TBST results may indicate a considerable false positive TBST rate. The QFT offers many advantages as a surveillance method over TBST in exposed worker populations.</p>
url http://www.occup-med.com/content/1/1/28
work_keys_str_mv AT gorterforrestd casecontrolstudyoffirefighterswithdocumentedpositivetuberculinskintestresultsusingquantiferontbtestingincomparisonwithfirefighterswithnegativetuberculinskintestresults
AT kelleypatrickl casecontrolstudyoffirefighterswithdocumentedpositivetuberculinskintestresultsusingquantiferontbtestingincomparisonwithfirefighterswithnegativetuberculinskintestresults
AT dominguezjohna casecontrolstudyoffirefighterswithdocumentedpositivetuberculinskintestresultsusingquantiferontbtestingincomparisonwithfirefighterswithnegativetuberculinskintestresults
AT reinhartsteven casecontrolstudyoffirefighterswithdocumentedpositivetuberculinskintestresultsusingquantiferontbtestingincomparisonwithfirefighterswithnegativetuberculinskintestresults
AT wernickhowardb casecontrolstudyoffirefighterswithdocumentedpositivetuberculinskintestresultsusingquantiferontbtestingincomparisonwithfirefighterswithnegativetuberculinskintestresults
AT englandtimothyl casecontrolstudyoffirefighterswithdocumentedpositivetuberculinskintestresultsusingquantiferontbtestingincomparisonwithfirefighterswithnegativetuberculinskintestresults
AT flemingjamesl casecontrolstudyoffirefighterswithdocumentedpositivetuberculinskintestresultsusingquantiferontbtestingincomparisonwithfirefighterswithnegativetuberculinskintestresults
AT papstvictor casecontrolstudyoffirefighterswithdocumentedpositivetuberculinskintestresultsusingquantiferontbtestingincomparisonwithfirefighterswithnegativetuberculinskintestresults
AT ladukealicia casecontrolstudyoffirefighterswithdocumentedpositivetuberculinskintestresultsusingquantiferontbtestingincomparisonwithfirefighterswithnegativetuberculinskintestresults
_version_ 1725648136997699584