Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb
The competition between the dominant mass-asymmetric and rarer narrow mass-symmetric fission modes in actinide nuclei are controlled by deformed and spherical shell effects. The low energy fission of 80180Hg was recently observed to be strongly mass-asymmetric, indicating that despite spherical shel...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Physics Letters B |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269320307449 |
id |
doaj-60aff0f942a94b4e8ca6e15c32b60ce4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
E. Prasad D.J. Hinde M. Dasgupta D.Y. Jeung A.C. Berriman B.M.A. Swinton-Bland C. Simenel E.C. Simpson R. Bernard E. Williams K.J. Cook D.C. Rafferty C. Sengupta J.F. Smith K. Vo-Phuoc J. Walshe |
spellingShingle |
E. Prasad D.J. Hinde M. Dasgupta D.Y. Jeung A.C. Berriman B.M.A. Swinton-Bland C. Simenel E.C. Simpson R. Bernard E. Williams K.J. Cook D.C. Rafferty C. Sengupta J.F. Smith K. Vo-Phuoc J. Walshe Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb Physics Letters B Nuclear fission Neutron deficient nuclei Mass-asymmetric fission Deformed shell gaps |
author_facet |
E. Prasad D.J. Hinde M. Dasgupta D.Y. Jeung A.C. Berriman B.M.A. Swinton-Bland C. Simenel E.C. Simpson R. Bernard E. Williams K.J. Cook D.C. Rafferty C. Sengupta J.F. Smith K. Vo-Phuoc J. Walshe |
author_sort |
E. Prasad |
title |
Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb |
title_short |
Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb |
title_full |
Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb |
title_fullStr |
Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb |
title_sort |
systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176os to 206pb |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Physics Letters B |
issn |
0370-2693 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
The competition between the dominant mass-asymmetric and rarer narrow mass-symmetric fission modes in actinide nuclei are controlled by deformed and spherical shell effects. The low energy fission of 80180Hg was recently observed to be strongly mass-asymmetric, indicating that despite spherical shell gaps in fragments around 4090Zr, the system does not fission mass-symmetrically. Several theoretical approaches have been used to explain this unexpected result.To investigate the underlying mechanism, systematic measurements of fission mass distributions for isotopes of Os, Pt, Hg and Pb, formed in fusion reactions with p, 12C, 32S, 40,48Ca projectiles, have been made for excitation energies above the fission saddle-point (Eeff⁎) between 2.8 and 28.2 MeV. Evidence for mass-asymmetric fission is widespread, manifested as flat topped mass distributions or significant deviations from a single Gaussian shape. The systematic trends seen cannot be attributed to quasifission. Comparing two-Gaussian fits at a wide range of E⁎, it is concluded that the fit centroids reflect the low energy character of mass-asymmetric fission in the sub-lead region.Quantitative comparisons were made with microscopic calculations by Scamps and Simenel (2019) [33] of fission mass-asymmetries attributed to the influence of shell gaps in both neutrons (N=52, 56 for compact octuple deformations) and protons (Z=34 and Z=42, 44, 46 with large quadrupole deformations). For the predominant fission mode in the calculations, having one elongated and one compact fragment, the results are in extremely good agreement with all experimental values. This provides strong support for both the calculations, and the exploration of mass-asymmetric fission systematics through heavy ion fusion reactions. The total kinetic energy distributions for 176Pt and 180Pt do not show any evidence of a low TKE mass-symmetric fission mode, as had been reported for 178Pt by Tsekhanovich et al. (2019) [39]. |
topic |
Nuclear fission Neutron deficient nuclei Mass-asymmetric fission Deformed shell gaps |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269320307449 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eprasad systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT djhinde systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT mdasgupta systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT dyjeung systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT acberriman systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT bmaswintonbland systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT csimenel systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT ecsimpson systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT rbernard systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT ewilliams systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT kjcook systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT dcrafferty systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT csengupta systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT jfsmith systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT kvophuoc systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb AT jwalshe systematicsofthemassasymmetricfissionofexcitednucleifrom176osto206pb |
_version_ |
1724388524115886080 |
spelling |
doaj-60aff0f942a94b4e8ca6e15c32b60ce42020-12-09T04:14:35ZengElsevierPhysics Letters B0370-26932020-12-01811135941Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206PbE. Prasad0D.J. Hinde1M. Dasgupta2D.Y. Jeung3A.C. Berriman4B.M.A. Swinton-Bland5C. Simenel6E.C. Simpson7R. Bernard8E. Williams9K.J. Cook10D.C. Rafferty11C. Sengupta12J.F. Smith13K. Vo-Phuoc14J. Walshe15Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; Corresponding author.Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; Department of Theoretical Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; Department of Theoretical Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaThe competition between the dominant mass-asymmetric and rarer narrow mass-symmetric fission modes in actinide nuclei are controlled by deformed and spherical shell effects. The low energy fission of 80180Hg was recently observed to be strongly mass-asymmetric, indicating that despite spherical shell gaps in fragments around 4090Zr, the system does not fission mass-symmetrically. Several theoretical approaches have been used to explain this unexpected result.To investigate the underlying mechanism, systematic measurements of fission mass distributions for isotopes of Os, Pt, Hg and Pb, formed in fusion reactions with p, 12C, 32S, 40,48Ca projectiles, have been made for excitation energies above the fission saddle-point (Eeff⁎) between 2.8 and 28.2 MeV. Evidence for mass-asymmetric fission is widespread, manifested as flat topped mass distributions or significant deviations from a single Gaussian shape. The systematic trends seen cannot be attributed to quasifission. Comparing two-Gaussian fits at a wide range of E⁎, it is concluded that the fit centroids reflect the low energy character of mass-asymmetric fission in the sub-lead region.Quantitative comparisons were made with microscopic calculations by Scamps and Simenel (2019) [33] of fission mass-asymmetries attributed to the influence of shell gaps in both neutrons (N=52, 56 for compact octuple deformations) and protons (Z=34 and Z=42, 44, 46 with large quadrupole deformations). For the predominant fission mode in the calculations, having one elongated and one compact fragment, the results are in extremely good agreement with all experimental values. This provides strong support for both the calculations, and the exploration of mass-asymmetric fission systematics through heavy ion fusion reactions. The total kinetic energy distributions for 176Pt and 180Pt do not show any evidence of a low TKE mass-symmetric fission mode, as had been reported for 178Pt by Tsekhanovich et al. (2019) [39].http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269320307449Nuclear fissionNeutron deficient nucleiMass-asymmetric fissionDeformed shell gaps |