The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009-07-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19621070/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-60caf9425e7348e299a11c2310d3581c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-60caf9425e7348e299a11c2310d3581c2021-04-21T18:25:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762009-07-0167e100010010.1371/journal.pmed.1000100The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.Alessandro LiberatiDouglas G AltmanJennifer TetzlaffCynthia MulrowPeter C GøtzscheJohn P A IoannidisMike ClarkeP J DevereauxJos KleijnenDavid MoherSystematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users.Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions.The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19621070/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alessandro Liberati
Douglas G Altman
Jennifer Tetzlaff
Cynthia Mulrow
Peter C Gøtzsche
John P A Ioannidis
Mike Clarke
P J Devereaux
Jos Kleijnen
David Moher
spellingShingle Alessandro Liberati
Douglas G Altman
Jennifer Tetzlaff
Cynthia Mulrow
Peter C Gøtzsche
John P A Ioannidis
Mike Clarke
P J Devereaux
Jos Kleijnen
David Moher
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
PLoS Medicine
author_facet Alessandro Liberati
Douglas G Altman
Jennifer Tetzlaff
Cynthia Mulrow
Peter C Gøtzsche
John P A Ioannidis
Mike Clarke
P J Devereaux
Jos Kleijnen
David Moher
author_sort Alessandro Liberati
title The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_short The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_full The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_fullStr The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_full_unstemmed The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_sort prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Medicine
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
publishDate 2009-07-01
description Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users.Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions.The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19621070/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandroliberati theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT douglasgaltman theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT jennifertetzlaff theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT cynthiamulrow theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT petercgøtzsche theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT johnpaioannidis theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT mikeclarke theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT pjdevereaux theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT joskleijnen theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT davidmoher theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT alessandroliberati prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT douglasgaltman prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT jennifertetzlaff prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT cynthiamulrow prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT petercgøtzsche prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT johnpaioannidis prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT mikeclarke prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT pjdevereaux prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT joskleijnen prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
AT davidmoher prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
_version_ 1714664914055856128