Effects of sulfur dioxide on wine made with sulfitic maceration

Sulfitic maceration is part of a technique used in large companies to store must through the superdosing of sulfur dioxide added after the destemming of the grapes. The objective of this study was to analyze the physico-chemical characteristics of the wines elaborated by sulfitic maceration. The stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jardim G.V., Zigiotto L., Machado W., Marcon Â.R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:BIO Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/full_html/2019/01/bioconf-oiv2018_02003/bioconf-oiv2018_02003.html
id doaj-610e53c6486f419dbe33a9e42e0b9e5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-610e53c6486f419dbe33a9e42e0b9e5b2021-04-02T18:55:42ZengEDP SciencesBIO Web of Conferences2117-44582019-01-01120200310.1051/bioconf/20191202003bioconf-oiv2018_02003Effects of sulfur dioxide on wine made with sulfitic macerationJardim G.V.0Zigiotto L.1Machado W.2Marcon Â.R.3Unipampa – Federal University of PampaUnipampa – Federal University of PampaUnipampa – Federal University of PampaUnipampa – Federal University of PampaSulfitic maceration is part of a technique used in large companies to store must through the superdosing of sulfur dioxide added after the destemming of the grapes. The objective of this study was to analyze the physico-chemical characteristics of the wines elaborated by sulfitic maceration. The study was conducted at the Federal University of Pampa (UNIPAMPA), Campus Dom Pedrito, RS, Brazil. Three vinifications (identified by treatments 1, 2 and 3) were performed with 3 replicates each. The grapes used were the cultivar Alicante Bouschet. Treatment 1 underwent the same procedures as treatment 2, except for the dosage of 1400 mg.L−1 of added sulfur dioxide. The grapes were destemmed, crushed and macerated for 2 days and before fermentation started, the must was heated to remove SO2. In the treatment 3 a traditional maceration was carried out for 5 days. The physicochemical characteristics of the wines were analyzed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and the results were analyzed by statistical analysis of comparison of averages. The color intensity of treatment 2 showed no significant difference in relation to the treatment 3, demonstrating that with 2 days of sulphitic maceration, occurs a color extraction similar to a traditional 5-day maceration.https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/full_html/2019/01/bioconf-oiv2018_02003/bioconf-oiv2018_02003.html
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jardim G.V.
Zigiotto L.
Machado W.
Marcon Â.R.
spellingShingle Jardim G.V.
Zigiotto L.
Machado W.
Marcon Â.R.
Effects of sulfur dioxide on wine made with sulfitic maceration
BIO Web of Conferences
author_facet Jardim G.V.
Zigiotto L.
Machado W.
Marcon Â.R.
author_sort Jardim G.V.
title Effects of sulfur dioxide on wine made with sulfitic maceration
title_short Effects of sulfur dioxide on wine made with sulfitic maceration
title_full Effects of sulfur dioxide on wine made with sulfitic maceration
title_fullStr Effects of sulfur dioxide on wine made with sulfitic maceration
title_full_unstemmed Effects of sulfur dioxide on wine made with sulfitic maceration
title_sort effects of sulfur dioxide on wine made with sulfitic maceration
publisher EDP Sciences
series BIO Web of Conferences
issn 2117-4458
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Sulfitic maceration is part of a technique used in large companies to store must through the superdosing of sulfur dioxide added after the destemming of the grapes. The objective of this study was to analyze the physico-chemical characteristics of the wines elaborated by sulfitic maceration. The study was conducted at the Federal University of Pampa (UNIPAMPA), Campus Dom Pedrito, RS, Brazil. Three vinifications (identified by treatments 1, 2 and 3) were performed with 3 replicates each. The grapes used were the cultivar Alicante Bouschet. Treatment 1 underwent the same procedures as treatment 2, except for the dosage of 1400 mg.L−1 of added sulfur dioxide. The grapes were destemmed, crushed and macerated for 2 days and before fermentation started, the must was heated to remove SO2. In the treatment 3 a traditional maceration was carried out for 5 days. The physicochemical characteristics of the wines were analyzed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and the results were analyzed by statistical analysis of comparison of averages. The color intensity of treatment 2 showed no significant difference in relation to the treatment 3, demonstrating that with 2 days of sulphitic maceration, occurs a color extraction similar to a traditional 5-day maceration.
url https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/full_html/2019/01/bioconf-oiv2018_02003/bioconf-oiv2018_02003.html
work_keys_str_mv AT jardimgv effectsofsulfurdioxideonwinemadewithsulfiticmaceration
AT zigiottol effectsofsulfurdioxideonwinemadewithsulfiticmaceration
AT machadow effectsofsulfurdioxideonwinemadewithsulfiticmaceration
AT marconar effectsofsulfurdioxideonwinemadewithsulfiticmaceration
_version_ 1721550611023921152