Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Background: There are limited data on the impact of feedback of incidental findings (IFs) from research imaging. We evaluated the impact of UK Biobank’s protocol for handling potentially serious IFs in a multi-modal imaging study of 100,000 participants (radiographer ‘flagging’ with radiologist con...
Main Authors: | Lorna M Gibson, Thomas J Littlejohns, Ligia Adamska, Steve Garratt, Nicola Doherty, UK Biobank Imaging Working Group, Joanna M Wardlaw, Giles Maskell, Michael Parker, Roger Brownsword, Paul M Matthews, Rory Collins, Naomi E Allen, Jonathan Sellors, Cathie LM Sudlow |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wellcome
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Wellcome Open Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/2-114/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging [version 3; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Lorna M Gibson, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Factors associated with potentially serious incidental findings and with serious final diagnoses on multi-modal imaging in the UK Biobank Imaging Study: A prospective cohort study.
by: Lorna M Gibson, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Accuracy of Patient Self-Report of Stroke: A Systematic Review from the UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group.
by: Rebecca Woodfield, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Accuracy of Electronic Health Record Data for Identifying Stroke Cases in Large-Scale Epidemiological Studies: A Systematic Review from the UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group.
by: Rebecca Woodfield, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
FAIRness in scientific publishing [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Philippa C. Matthews
Published: (2016-12-01)